We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
also known as Jeffrey J. Randa and Counselors at Law
2
Practice Areas
34 years
34 years
We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: Michigan
Acquired: 1990
Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2003
75 N Main St, Mount Clemens, MI, 48043-5695
1441 E. Maple, Troy, MI, 48083
27 Client Reviews
Showing 1 - 5 of 6 reviews | Communication Style
Posted by Ray | August 07, 2024 | Hired Attorney | Ethics & Professional Responsibility
Arrogant/Unreliable
After receiving a guarantee of a restoration he refused to be a lawyer and advocate for me in order to achieve his GUARANTEED goal. Additionally, I he violated attorney/client privilege which is not only morally terrible but, also, seriously hampered my case. A condescending, argumentative, contentio...
Ray, the reason we could not proceed in your case is that you could NOT provide us with the legally required letters of support. In our letter to you explaining this, and containing a refund check, we included this language from the Michigan Secretary of State: "The Administrative Law Examiner requires a minimum of three (3) clear statements in support of claims of continuous abstinence from alcohol and mind-altering drugs, including marijuana and cocaine, from people who are in a good position to know. Letters should be from people who have known a Petitioner for a substantial period of time, years rather than months, and who see a Petitioner at least one (1) time per week or more, rather than 1 time per month or less. Letters must clearly state how the writer knows the Petitioner, how often they actually see the Petitioner. Letters must clearly state when the last time they knew the Petitioner to have consumed any amount of alcohol, a sip of beer, a toast of wine, and the last time they knew the Petitioner to have used any type of mind-altering drug, including marijuana and cocaine. Letters must be specific. Vague letters do not lead to success in these hearings. If a writer has never known the Petitioner to have used any mind-altering drugs they should clearly state this in their letter. Letters that are all from coworkers, or all from members of the AA recovery community whose contacts with a Petitioner are limited to the work setting or the AA setting, are given much more limited weight and are more likely to result in the denial of an appeal." Unfortunately, none of the letters you provided for testimonial purposes met those requirements, and your inability to provide anything like that essentially precludes a win. Here are a few other excerpts from the letter we sent to you with along your refund check: "It was our hope that we could work together as a team and produce a win. However, you have not been able to provide viable testimonial letters from people in [state name], where you have resided since 2016, who see and know you and who otherwise have sufficient personal knowledge of your drinking, drugging and abstinence history." "It has been your position that you are unable to provide such witnesses from where you live. Without this kind of written testimony, we simply cannot produce a favorable outcome for you." Your inability to provide these letters, as required by law, was the SOLE cause for us being unable to proceed with your case. There was nothing even remotely close to any violation of attorney - client privilege. Instead, you became upset because the evaluator questioned why you changed and back-dated your previously stated sobriety date, and then suddenly claimed that you had NOT used several drugs that you previously indicated you had tried and/or used. We ALWAYS stand by our guarantee, but we will NEVER file a case that's so obviously unable to win, or based upon misinformation. That's why we refunded all unearned monies ($2900) to you.
Posted by anonymous | November 17, 2018 | Lawsuits & Disputes
bad idea
Majority of the staff I dealt with were rude right from the beginning. Should have looked around more and did my research. On numerous occasions they lost track of my payments so I had to make sure I kept everything accurate for my record and theirs. Failed to keep active communication with me and up...
Anonymous, We have NEVER sent "packets" of any kind through the mail, and when we do send correspondence, it is weighed and metered before it goes out. Payments are double noted on both an intake log and then receipted. Our fee agreement covers every contingency, and is crystal clear. My staff is always friendly, and, if your statement that they "were rude right from the beginning" is true, why would you have used us?
Posted by Martin | August 21, 2018 | Hired Attorney
job well done
Excellent team Jeffrey and his associates. First lawyer I have hired. The only thing I would suggest to the lawyer and his team is when you first go in to talk to them about license reinstatement. Is have a paper written with all or most of the steps. Either that is ask a lot of questions and ...
Posted by Vaso | April 11, 2018 | Hired Attorney | DUI & DWI
Knowledgable, Friendly, and Determined
I hired Jeffrey Randa to help me with the Michigan driver's restoration process. My license had been revoked for years due to DUIs in my past, and I had also moved out of state. I hired Jeffrey based on online information as well as my communications with him. He has a educational online presence....
Thank you for the great review Vaso. Sobriety is the key to a successful Michigan driver's license restoration. You did the hardest part when you stopped drinking.
Posted by anonymous | February 05, 2017 | Hired Attorney | DUI & DWI
Don't know how he did it
Really great, relatable, understanding guy who got my DUI reduced to a minor with a BAC (zero tolerance) when I was above the limit. Also violated my probation at the same place and he still reduced my consequences. Him and his staff were always there for me with any questions-never made you feel dum...
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2003.
Reprimand issued in MI, 2003
updated on 03/10/2010Reprimand means an attorney did something wrong but may still practice law. The State gives the lawyer a public reprimand in hopes that he or she will not repeat the behavior. Details of the infraction are made part of the public record.
1993 - Present
Attorney/Proprietor, Jeffrey J. Randa Attorney and Counselors at Law
1992 - Present
Macomb County Bar AssociationMember
1990 - Present
State Bar of MichiganMember
1986
Bachelor of Arts (B.A.),
N/A
JD
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2018
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
2017
English