Daniel N. Garon

Daniel N. Garon

4.0
Rating: 6.5

Licensed for 36 years

Criminal defense Lawyer at Mount Clemens, MI
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense

48 Market St Ste 2 B, Mount Clemens, MI

About Daniel

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Michigan for 36 years

State: Michigan

Acquired: 1989

Active in Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in Ohio for 30 years

State: Ohio

Acquired: 1995

Suspended

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Fischer Garon Hoyumpa & Rancilio

48 Market St Ste 2 B, Mount Clemens, MI, 48043-5663

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Daniel N. Garon's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.0 /5.0

4 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (4) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Punctuality

Posted by Jerry | June 05, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Criminal Defense

Treat you like sh*t and doesn't care about your case/ strictly money

Terrible experience with Dan Garon, upon arriving to speak about my case is the only time he showed any kind of concern/respect. Of course once the money was paid out all of that went out the window, Dan did ABSOLUTELY NO research and was no help to my case. He adjourned the first few court dates cla...iming we were waiting on evidence so that I would not have to pay $3200+ for false damages my ex claimed. First time I did show in court he sent his assistant instead and adjourned that court date as well claiming we were just going to see if she shows up and then go from there. I asked if she does show up then what? I was given a short barely any answer of "we'll see". Well my ex showed up and Dan finally shows up and when we speak he tells me I have to pay the $3200 and receive a misdemeanor?! (Mind you this is only for a cracked headlight), I asked Dan why are we settling when she has showed no evidence? He says we have the evidence/pics and guess what Dan shows me? The pics that I presented to him myself showing the damage my ex did to MY house and car!!! That was when I realized he does not pay attention at all, from there he basically just wanted me to pay the money out right then and there while telling me "You need to make up your F*cking mind"!? I literally had to get up and leave from his face because things were about to go left real quick, I had to repeatedly tell Dan watch how you speaking to me. After I told him about his self he responded like a little school girl saying "well now your raising your voice at me" as if I didn't have the right when you speaking to me crazy, didn't do a lick of research, passive aggressive demeanor etc. I had to keep expressing that I was on the last month of being on the "clean slate program" and this petty charge will set me back, Dan never remembered that even though I told him and his assistant multiple times. When I reminded him that he finally went and got a different deal where I pay the $3200 (still no evidence/never disputed the amount) and no charges, why would you not have presented that to me in the first place? Then when asked about payment he just kept saying they need it NOW, never pushed for a further date or anything until I had to keep going back and fourth with him, wanted to only give me a week but I asked for a month and was granted that. SO all in all if I left my case up to Dan I would be paying $3200+ and have a new misdemeanor for a broken headlight. Avoid this fool at all cost, I never gave a**hole energy or come off that way esp when I'm speaking with a lawyer so the way he handled business struck me awfully wrong, from the looks of these reviews though I'm not alone, seems like all the terrible reviews from this office is only coming from DAN

See All Client Reviews

Daniel N. Garon's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Daniel

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  6.5 (Good)

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution