No Photo

Randi P. Glanz

Licensed for 34 years

Family Lawyer at Birmingham, MI
Practice Areas: Family

220 Park St Ste 200, Birmingham, MI

Claim Profile

Is this your profile? Claiming it is free and only takes 2 minutes.

About Randi

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Michigan for 34 years

State: Michigan

Acquired: 1991

Active in Good Standing

No misconduct found

Location

Clark Hill PLC

220 Park St Ste 200, Birmingham, MI, 48009-3477

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Randi P. Glanz's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

2.9 /5.0

13 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (13) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 6 - 6 of 6 reviews | Compassion

Posted by anonymous | November 04, 2008 | Divorce & Separation

MISREPRESENTED

SHE LIED, MUNIPULATED, SAID SHE COULD NOT MAKE CHANGES TO THE SETTLEMENT, THEN SCHEDULED APPOINTMENTS TO MAKE THE CHANGE AND THEN THERE WERE NO CHANGES TO BE MADE. SHE TOLD US THAT WE HAD TO SETTLE THAT DAY, AS SHE SAID THE JUDGE SPOKE TO HER AND THE OTHER ATTORNEY AND WHEN I WAS IN FRONT OF THE JUDG...E THE JUDGE ASKED AS WHERE OUR ATTORNEYS WERE, I SAID SHE SAID SHE ALREADY SEEN YOU AND THE JUDGTE LOOKED AT ME AND MY HUSBAND AND SAID "I HAVE NOT SEEN YOUR ATTORNEYS AT ALL TODAY. SHE CHARGED ME $22,000.00 FOR ONE MONTH TO REVIEW PAPER WORK THAT WAS GIVEN TO HER. SHE TOLD ME TO DO THINGS THAT WOULD NOT EFFECT ME OR MY CHILDREN, THAT WAS A BIG LIE AS WELL, WE MET WITH A MEDIATOR TO DISCUSS ABOUT JOINT LEGAL JOINT PHYSICAL, AND WE HAD AGREED WITH THE MEDIATOR THAT IT WAS BEST FOR THE CHILDREN TO HAVE THIS THEN WE GO TO COURT AND SHE COMES UP TO ME AND SAYS WERE GOING TO TRIAL. THE TIME WITH THE MEDIATOR WAS WAISTED AND IT WAS A LIE, WE SHOULD OF NEVER WENT TO TRIAL AS WE HAD AGREED. I WAS ON THE STAND FOR 6 DAYS, THE SHE APOSED ME AND TOLD ME TO SAY YES TO EVERYTHING. ABOUT HER SERVICES THAT SHE WAS GOOD, AND I WAS HAPPY, I JUST WANTED MY DIVORCE. THEN I GET A DIVORCE WITHOUT NO CHILD SUPPORT, NO ALLIMONY, NO HOUSE, WE HAD SEVERAL, MY EX GOT ALL THE BUSINESS, AS SHE RETAINED EXPERT WITNESS'S TO DO THIS AND CHARGED ME OVER 140,000.00 IN BILLS. I DID NOT GET ONE THING OUT OF THIS BUT A BILL, AND MANY LEINS ON EVERYTHING. SHE ENDED UP GETTING A RECEIVER BECAUSE THEY DID NOT KNOW HOW TO CONTROLL MY EX HUSBAND SO THE ARBITRATOR WAS SUPPOSED TO SELL OUR PROPERTIES, (INSTEAD HE TURNED EVERYTHING INTO A MEAT GRINDER) AND PUT TOGETHER A SETTLEMENT FOR RANDI AND I THE RECEIVER MADE MANY PHONE CALLS TO OTHER PEOPLE THAT WERENT INVOLVED AND HE PUT HIS PHONE CALLS ON MY BILL AS WELL. THESE PEOPLE HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH OUR DIVORCE, THEY WERE FRIENDS OF MINE. SO HE PUTS TOGETHER A SETTLEMENT, AND CALLS ME AND SAID" I CAN ACT FAST, SO HOW FAST CAN YOU ACT. HE PUT IT IN THERE THAT I WAS NOT TO SUE RANDI GLANZ FOR MISREPRESENTATION AND THEY WOULD GIVE ME SOME MONEY, AND THIS WAS TO ALSO REDUCE MY FEES FOR THIS. EVERYTHING I WAS AWARDED IN THE JUDEGMENT OF DIVORCE, GOT TAKEN AWAY, I GOT NOTHING!!!!!!!!! I WAS SUPPOSED TO HAVE FIRST RIGHT OF REFUSAL IN THE JUDGEMENT TO PURCHASE MY HOME THAT I WAS LIVING IN AND I RECIEVE THE LETTER THE DAY COURT HAD ALREADY HAPPENED AND IT WAS NOT OFFERED TO ME AT ALL. THEY SOLD MY HOUSE AND TOLD ME THAT I HAD NOT EVEN TWO WEEKS TO GET OUT, WITH MY CHILDREN AND I . WE WERE PUT OUT INTO THE STREET. RANDI CONTINUED TO LIE, MAKE APPOINTMENTS ON MY MONEY AND SHE DID NOTHING FOR ME, SHE IS FROM CLARK-HILL OF BIRMINGHAM. SHE DID NOT LOOK INTO THE BEST INTEREST OF MY CHLDREN, SHE WANTED WAR IMMEDIATELY. THE FIRST DAY I MET MY EX HUSBANDS ATTORNEY, HE SAID, "SO HOW IS YOUR AFFAIR GOING"? SHE SAID NOTHING TO HIM. SHE WOULD MAKE US WAIT FOR HOURS WHILE HER AND THE OTHER ATTORNEY WOULD BE IN A ROOM FOR 4 OR FIVE HOURS, AND I GO OPEN THE ROOM AND SAID THERE WORKING ON THINGS. THEY WERE LAUGHING AND TALKING ABOUT THE OTHER ATTORNEYS WIFE. SHE WOULD NEVER RETURN PHONE CALLS, MAYBE ONCE IN A WHILE, THE E-MAILS WERE THE BEST. I WOULD ASK FOR SOMETHING AND GET SOMETING TOTALLY DIFFERENT. SINCE DAY ONE GOING IN FRONT OF A JUDGE FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER, SHE SAID TO ME"THE JUDGE HATES WOMEN" THAT REALLY WENT OVER GOOD, YOU CAN'T CHANGE A JUDGE AS WELL, YOUR STUCK WITH HER UNTIL SHE DIES OR RETIRES. THE JUDGE DID NOT CARE ABOUT NOTHING. I WISH I COULD REALLY MEET AN ATTORNEY THAT IS THERE FOR THE PEOPLE. NOT TO MENTION RANDI ALSO CALLED ME AND LEFT A MESSAGE PRIOR TO THE END OF THE DIVORCE AND SAID SHE WAS TURNING OVER THE FILE TO THE ATTORNEY THAT I HAD SPOKE TO AS MY EX'S ATTORNEY HAD HEARD I WAS TALKING TO ANOTHER ATTORNEY, SO DO YOU REALLY THINK SHE CARED ABOUT MY DIVORCE???? NOT AT ALL, SHE SCREWED ME SO BAD, SHE DOES NOT KNOW WHAT IT IS LIKE. SOME DAY SHE WILL GET HERS. THEN SHE DOES NOT CALL ME FOR A COUPLE OF MONTHS, THEN BILLS ME FOR POST DIVORCE. THIS HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR OVER 1 1/2 YEARS, AND WE STILL HAVE NOT G

See All Client Reviews

Randi P. Glanz's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Randi

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Education

1991

Michigan State University College of Law

JD

N/A

Detroit College of Law

JD

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution