Joshua Marc Mastison

Joshua Marc Mastison

4.2
Rating: 6.5

Licensed for 19 years

Criminal defense Lawyer at Newburgh, IN
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense, Estate Planning, Family, Mediation

320 W. Jennings St, Unit B, Newburgh, IN

About Joshua

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Indiana for 19 years

State: Indiana

Acquired: 2006

Active in Good Standing

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Joshua Marc Mastison

320 W. Jennings St, Unit B, Newburgh, IN, 47630

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Joshua Marc Mastison's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.2 /5.0

15 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (15) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 3 of 3 reviews | 1 star

Posted by Jalin | August 14, 2026 | Hired Attorney

Just hire John Brinson. He’s going to truly fight for your best possible outcome. I wish i had the opportunity to that route.

My experience left me without confidence in my representation. The State’s initial offer was one year of corrections suspended to one year of reporting probation, plus 60 hours of community service. I explained that I wasn’t opposed to resolving the case, but the conditions presented serious prac...tical difficulties. I work 55–60+ hours per week in an underground coal mine, rotating every two weeks between day and night shifts, and receive only one PTO day per month. That limited PTO will ultimately have to be used, at least in part, for probation reporting. Adding 60 hours of community service on top of my work and reporting obligations makes satisfactory compliance extremely challenging. I therefore asked whether we could get non-reporting probation and little or no community service. Even if we couldn’t i at least expected an attempt to negotiate, I wasn’t asking for a guarantee—I simply wanted my attorney to advocate for an arrangement I could realistically comply with. His response was essentially that this was what the State offered and they weren’t going to do non-reporting probation. When I asked if there was anything else we could do, rather than discussing alternatives or a possible counteroffer, he asked, “So you want me to set it for trial?” He then warned that if we went to trial and things didn’t go my way, I could potentially spend a year incarcerated. I understand that an attorney should explain the risks of trial. What concerned me was how quickly the conversation went from my asking whether workable terms could be negotiated to trial and potential incarceration. The conversation itself was also handled in a manner I found extremely unprofessional. He didn’t pull me aside to discuss my case privately. We were standing approximately 10–12 feet apart in an open courtroom at points discussing my criminal case, employment circumstances and potential sentence where others could hear us. I found that embarrassing and unnecessary. I also had serious concerns regarding the preparation of my defense. To my knowledge, he had not even requested the surveillance footage concerning the alleged incident. When someone’s liberty is potentially at stake, I believe it’s reasonable to expect readily identifiable evidence to at least be investigated. After having time to consider everything, I asked whether reporting probation could possibly be changed to non-reporting over time if I accepted the agreement. He then told me it was always a possibility, although not guaranteed. Ultimately, I accepted the plea agreement. I didn’t accept it because my concerns had been resolved. I accepted it because after this interaction, I had lost confidence that I would have an attorney vigorously advocating for me if I rejected the offer and proceeded to trial. I cannot speak to what was in his mind or what his intentions were. I can only describe my experience and the impression his words, tone, demeanor and handling of the situation left with me. I understand attorneys cannot guarantee outcomes and prosecutors don’t have to accept counteroffers. I wasn’t asking for guarantees. I expected private communication, meaningful discussion of my options, investigation of relevant evidence, and an attorney who would advocate for reasonable alternatives. Instead, I left the courtroom feeling pressured, unheard, embarrassed and without confidence in my own representation. When answering the judges questions to wave my rights to accept the plea i wanted to say all of this throughout. But as a father and a husband i bit the bullet so to speak,because I have a family relying on me and couldn’t stomach the thought of a trial with this individual as my representation. Based on my personal experience, I cannot recommend this attorney. Choose someone else. Or who knows maybe it was just me not worth fighting for he may do an outstanding job for you. Ive never been one to gamble but of it’s your thing This Is Your Guy!

Joshua Mastison

Replied last August 14, 2026

First, I am always sad to hear that a client didn't feel that I was willing to listen and fight for them, but ultimately, a client must make a decision as to what is best for them, their case and current situation. I also understand that the criminal justice system can be scary and intimidating, but I can't read a client's mind and need a dialogue. My representation is a 2-way street; I need input from my client before the case is over. I try my best to meet, discuss and explain options with my clients. I also know life, work and family need our time too, but when a client is facing a criminal charge, I ask them to make it a priority. When I was first appointed and assigned to this case, I got the client's contact information and asked for him to call or email me to schedule a time a talk. At any time, clients can hire another attorney. I explained the general timeline and procedure with receiving discovery from the State. I never heard from this client and emailed him once I received and reviewed discovery from the State. As mentioned in the review, this client must have secured new employment during this process, which is great, but I wasn't made aware of that news. During this time, I am frequently emailing and discussing cases w/ the prosecutor concerning the facts, background, and options to resolve cases. Trial is always an option but there are risks associated with trial, including jail and it is my job to fully advise my clients of all potential fines and penalties, including jail. There is alot of work and negotiations going on behind the scenes. I am direct and honest and not everyone is ready to for that but I don't want to mislead anyone. Once I had an offer, I emailed that information to the client. Again, I didn't hear back and once at court, I try to my best to get there early and meet w/ as many clients as possible before court, and yes, that does sometime happen in the courtroom before the Judge is on the bench or hallway. Generally, once we have discovery, an offer and the option of trial, the client has to make a decision as to how we move forward. Also, based upon my experience, I know that some terms of an offer are non-negotiable and as the Judge likes to say, "probation is a privilege." A high percentage of cases require reporting probation at the beginning, and can change to non-reporting with success, and community service are the lowest level conditions of a plea if a client has any type of prior criminal history. Finally, again, I can't read a client's mind and if they say they want to accept an offer, I will not stand in their way. I can only go with what I'm told. Again, I wish this client would have discussed these issues w/ me prior to the court date but I also understand that clients want to get a guaranteed resolution rather than prolonging the process - but that is their decision. I always want to improve and gain experience for my clients.

Posted by Michelle | October 28, 2021 | Hired Attorney

Would NOT recommend

We found Mr. Mastison through Melife Legal Plans. I called for about two weeks not realizing that only he answers the phone. I finally left a vm and he did call back same day. He seemed very reluctant to meet in person, I assured him we had been fully vaccinated and would wear a mask (thinking hi...s reluctance was due to covid) He set an appt with us for two months out. He wanted us to send our previous wills to him via email I did. We took off work the day of the appt, showed up promptly at our appointment time only to find the door locked. I checked my email to make sure he had not sent an email that morning cancelling. He had not. I called and he answered and came to the door. He told us he wouldn't meet with us. He said he sent an email (which he had not) He said he wanted to be completely honest about why he didn't want to meet with us even though he had set the appt and requested our personal information. His reasoning...he had a flat tire that morning, had to borrow a family members car and had to pick his children up later. No regard for the time and money it cost us to take off work and drive there. We don't live in the same city his practice is. He said "if" we want to reschedule it would be a month out. Keep in mind we had already waited two months. I would never do business with him, nor could I in good conscience recommend him. I am very concerned about him having all of our personal information that he requested.

Joshua Mastison

Replied last November 03, 2021

I believe everyone’s time has value, and that is why I explained to Mrs. Webb in our first telephone call, and follow-up emails, that due to covid restrictions and court shutdowns, my calendar was more congested than normal, and she may want to contact another attorney through the referral network. Although I emailed her that we could discuss her estate planning sooner if we could schedule a teleconference or zoom meeting, she insisted on scheduling a meeting in person; this pushed our initial consultation further in the future than usual. The morning of our first in-person meeting, I ran into numerous problems that disrupted my schedule for that day, including a flat tire as I tried to leave to take the kids to school. I had other cases that morning, so I notified the court as well as my clients via email I was running late and needed to ask to reschedule. Everyone was accommodating and understanding, however Mrs. Webb showed up at my office and indicated that she did not receive my email. She then proceeded to yell and threaten me because I asked to reschedule her meeting. I was merely seeking some grace and understanding regarding the unforeseen circumstances of my day. Obviously, she was not charged, and I was not hired to complete any work on her behalf. All her personal and confidential information has been properly discarded and I hope she is able to accomplish her estate planning w/ another attorney.

Posted by anonymous | November 30, 2017 | Hired Attorney

Inexperienced & Vain Attorney

Found him to be very uncaring, vain and inexperienced. Had to do "research" on child custody laws which we found odd since his is a family law attorney; and yes, we were billed for his "research" at $175 per hour! He took extended amounts of time to prepare any document only to find most were inadequ...ate per the courts/opposite attorney and of course, we were charged for it including him filing incorrect paperwork. We fired him and hired a new attorney due to his actions. Would not recommend for anyone needing an attorney with the family courts.

Joshua Mastison

Replied last November 30, 2017

Let me begin by saying that I hoped to meet and discuss these issues with this client prior to our relationship dissolving; I am very open to constructive criticism, want to constantly improve and try to be the best attorney possible. Unfortunately, especially in family law cases, each case is complex and there is no “one size fits all” answer or solution to the client’s problems, which means that a responsible attorney has a duty to research recent case law and rulings to confirm proper understanding of the current state of the law. After this research, I can then best advise my client and provide them with options. Research and billing are clearly addressed in my engagement letter. I’m unsure how to respond to the filings comment? I don't think this is accurate. I feel it is my job as an attorney to provide straight forward opinions and all potential outcomes of the client's case. Sometimes the client isn’t ready to hear some of these hard truths, but I think it is absolutely necessary to discuss and explore before court so there are no surprise outcomes.

See All Client Reviews

Joshua Marc Mastison's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Joshua

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  6.5 (Good)

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution