William Perry McCall III

William Perry McCall III's Legal Cases (15)

Jeffersonville, IN

Criminal defense Lawyer at Jeffersonville, IN

Practice Areas: Criminal Defense, State, Local And Municipal Law

Message View Profile
Message View Profile
Criminal defense

State of Indiana vs. Lewis A. Steward, 88D01-9812-DF-415

Jun 07, 1999

OUTCOME: Not Guilty on all counts

Washington County, Indiana case where client was charged with multiple counts, including Domestic Battery, Class D Felony. The State called the client's wife as a witness, however, during direct exami ... nation her account of the events which resulted in the client's arrest changed significantly prompting the State to treat her as a hostile witness. The defense was able to take advantage of the State's aggressive questioning of the alleged victim during cross examination and during closing argument. After the not guilty verdicts on all counts the jury indicated while they believed the client was probably guilty they were disappointed with how the prosecutor had treated the alleged victim which defense counsel emphasized during closing arguments.

Criminal defense

State of Indiana vs. David Allen Tappel, 10D02-9707-CF-075

Jun 23, 1998

OUTCOME: Not Guilty of all charges

Client charged with Dealing In Cocaine, Class A Felony and Possession of Cocaine, Class C Felony. The State alleged the client possessed a significant quantity of cocaine (above the amount for persona ... l use) and packaged for sale. The cocaine was found in an iguana tank in the apartment the client shared with two other individuals. The State argued the client's constructive possession of the cocaine. The defense produced evidence the two roommates were the real owners of the cocaine and had been made plea deals which insured they did not go to prison.

Criminal defense

Sate of Indiana vs. Granville Phipps, 10C01-9203-CF-035

Nov 02, 1994

OUTCOME: In one of the shortest jury deliberations in Clark County history the jury came back with a not guilty verdict in less than 15 minutes

Client was charged with Attempted Criminal Confinement, Class C Felony, in which the State alleged the client attempt to lure a young girl into his vehicle as she was waiting to cross the street. The ... client failed a polygraph examination and allegedly gave law enforcement a confession admitting to the crime which was not recorded. Defense counsel presented evidence to the jury of the client's low IQ and unfair and questionable law enforcement tactics in obtaining the so-called confession.

Criminal defense

State of Indiana vs. Richard Waterbury

Nov 02, 1993

OUTCOME: Hung jury leading to favorable plea agreement in which the client was sentenced to 14 years of probation

Client charged with Murder of his former boss. No eyewitness or murder weapon recovered by law enforcement. Defendant denied any responsibility for the death of the alleged victim. Total circumstant ... ial evidence case. The Defense was able to show the deceased had a substantial criminal history of sexually abusing young kids and teenagers and presented the jury with other individuals who may have wanted to harm the deceased. After an eight day jury trial and lengthy jury deliberations the jury came back hung. Mistrial declared. During preparation for the second jury trial the State and defense counsel entered into a plea agreement on Involuntary Manslaughter, C Felony; Obstruction of Justice, D Felony and Possession of Handgun Without a Permit, Class A Misdemeanor.

Criminal defense

State of Indiana vs. Gregory Taylor, 10C01-9112-CF-149

Jul 09, 1992

OUTCOME: Not Guilty of all charges

Clark County, Indiana Rape, Class B Felony; Criminal Confinement, Class D Felony and Battery, Class A Misdemeanor case. Client charged with the rape of his estranged wife. The defense challenged the ... prosecutor's theory of the case on the basis of consensual sexual intercourse. The defense was able to show the jury the alleged victim apparently had a new love interest and wanted the client out of her life by making false criminal allegations against the client.

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
Learn More About the Avvo Rating