Employment Disability Discrimination
May 01, 2015OUTCOME: Confidential Settlement wherein client received over one years salary.
Employee with disability was denied interactive process and resigned.
PRO
WILL MATTHEW SMITH's Legal Cases (3)
ESCONDIDO, CA
Litigation Lawyer at ESCONDIDO, CA
Practice Areas: Litigation, Personal Injury ... +3 more
Slip & Fall
Feb 02, 2015OUTCOME: Confidential Settlement wherein client was compensated for full measure of pain and suffering.
Woman fell at a conference center with low lighting and suffered physical injuries. Initially liability was denied.
Carne v. Worthington
N/AOUTCOME: Reversed and Remanded
Carne v. Worthington Filed April 13, 2016, Fourth District, Div. One Cite as D067756 Decedent executed a revocable trust in 1985 (the “1985 Trust”), and real property located on Via Regla was tr ... ansferred to the 1985 Trust. Decedent executed an irrevocable trust in 2009 (the “2009 Trust”) which stated, “I transfer to my Trustee the property listed in Schedule A, attached to this agreement.” The sole asset listed on Schedule A was the Via Regla property. Decedent’s daughter filed a petition to confirm the validity of the 2009 Trust and that the Via Regla property was an asset of the 2009 Trust. The trial court found the transfer of Via Regla to the 2009 Trust was not valid because decedent was required to transfer title to the Via Regla property by a deed, and because decedent did not personally own the property at the time of the transfer. The appellate court reversed. The language quoted above in the 2009 Trust was sufficient to convey the property to the 2009 Trust, and decedent was not required to execute a deed. While decedent did not own the property individually at the time of the transfer, his signature on the 2009 Trust was sufficient to convey title from the 1985 Trust to the 2009 Trust because the 1985 Trust was a revocable inter vivos trust, he owned the property as sole trustee of the 1985 Trust, and he had the power to transfer real property owned by the 1985 Trust. http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/D067756.PDF