Morales v Walker Motor Sales, Inc.
N/AOUTCOME: Consume won
Case of first impression interpreting lending institution liability under the FTC “anti holder in due course” rule in the absence of the mandatory language
Dayton, OH
Lemon law Lawyer at Dayton, OH
Practice Areas: Lemon Law, Consumer Protection
OUTCOME: Consume won
Case of first impression interpreting lending institution liability under the FTC “anti holder in due course” rule in the absence of the mandatory language
OUTCOME: Consumer won trial and appeal
holding it to be illegal for a car dealer to have a consumer sign any new car sales document before disclosing prior damage in excess of minimum repair allowed by law
OUTCOME: Consumer won appeal, case settled
The first case in Ohio to apply Ohio’s Credit Services Organization Act to the financing practices of a car dealership. Car dealers later heavily lobbied the state legislature for months and got the la ... w changed.
OUTCOME: Consumer won
Case of first impression discussing class action certification requirements in light of the Credit Services Organization and Consumer Acts and car dealership sales and financing practices
OUTCOME: Consumer won
A case of first impression holding the Credit Services Organization Act to be applicable to a car dealership where money is paid for dealership’s credit services
OUTCOME: Consumer won
This was an “autofraud” case involving a used car sold “as is” where jury instructions and the applicability of the Ohio Tort Reform Act’s burden of proof in common law fraud were contested
OUTCOME: Consumer won
a “lemon law” case involving a handicap-conversion van, holding that the breach of a warranty can diminish the value of a vehicle and that can be unfair to the consumer
OUTCOME: Cincinnati Reds won
case interpreting Ohio’s taxpayer rights statute
OUTCOME: Consume won
Case of first impression deciding that a vehicle was a "new motor vehicle" under the Lemon Law if it was purchased within its first eighteen thousand miles of operation and within one year of the origi ... nal delivery date. This statutory interpretation was later validated by the Ohio Supreme Court in Curl v Volkswagen, 2007-Ohio-3609
OUTCOME: Consumer won, class settled
Truth In Lending Act case involved first impression of interpreting statutory conflict between Ohio Retail Instalment Sales Act and the National Bank Act