Cincinnati, OH
Lawsuits and disputes Lawyer at Cincinnati, OH
Practice Areas: Lawsuits & Disputes
OUTCOME: Settlement of $10,000,000 plus $2,200,000 in fees
Qui tam case against General Electric in which relators alleged the manufacture and sale to the United States of nonconforming jet engine hardware. United States intervened.
OUTCOME: $10,000,000 settlement
Qui tam case involving Stark and antikickback law allegations against Long Term Acute Care hospital as well as Cost Report allegations. Extensive discovery conducted; case settled during mediation.
OUTCOME: Settlement of $13,200,000 plus fees
This qui tam case involved the manufacture and sale of defective valves for use in U.S. Navy submarines. two executives sent to federal prison. The United States did not intervene. One of our clients w ... as named the Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers Citizen Advocate of the Year for her efforts in this case.
OUTCOME: Settlement of $6,500,000
Army veteran Roger Owensby was asphyxiated by Cincinnati police officers who attempted to stop him as a result of what was believed to be a case of mistaken identity. After extensive discovery, the Uni ... ted States District Court awarded rare summary judgment to the Owensby family.
OUTCOME: Pepsico defeated; counterclaims settled
PepsiCo sued CIC to terminate its highly-valuable Pepsi bottling franchises in Florida and Ohio. We vigorously defended the case and obtained summary judgment against PepsiCo. PepsiCo failed to get sum ... mary judgment against CIC's counterclaims. CIC was subsequently sold to a PepsiCo-owned entity for $340,000,000. Pepsico, Inc. v. Central Investment Corp., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25764 (S.D. Ohio 2002) Pepsico, Inc. v. Central Investment Corp., 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25765 (S.D. Ohio 2002) Pepsico, Inc. v. Central Investment Corp., 216 F.R.D. 418 (S.D. Ohio 2002) PepsiCo, Inc. v. Central Investment Corp., 268 F. Supp. 2d 962 (S.D. Ohio 2001) PepsiCo, Inc. v. Central Investment Corp., 271 F. Supp.2d 1040 (S.D. Ohio 2001)
OUTCOME: $3,400,000 damage award
Mr. Perkins was a seaman on the Ohio River. He fell from one level of a towboat to another and was badly injured. The trial court ruled against him. We were able to get the verdict against him reversed ... on appeal and then secured a damage award in his favor of more than $3,400,000, which was affirmed by the Sixth Circuit. Perkins v. Am. Elec. Power Fuel Supply, Inc., 91 Fed. Appx. 370 (6th Cir. 2004) Perkins v. Am. Elec. Power Fuel Supply, Inc., 246 F.3d 593 (6th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 994 (2001)
OUTCOME: $61,500,000 Settlement
Boeing bought defective transmission gears and sold the United States remanufactured Chinook CH-47D helicopters containing the bad gears. Our client blew the whistle on this practice. The United States ... intervened. The case was heavily litigated, with more than 300 depositions being taken. Settlement was reached in late 2000, with certain issues reserved for appeal. Published Opinions in the case: United States ex rel. Roby v. Boeing Co., 302 F.3d 637 (6th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 969 (2003) United States ex rel. Roby v. Boeing Co., 100 F. Supp. 2d 619 (S.D. Ohio 2000) United States ex rel. Roby v. Boeing Co., 79 F. Supp. 2d 877 (S.D. Ohio 1999) United States ex rel. Roby v. Boeing Co., 189 F.R.D. 512 (S.D. Ohio 1999) United States ex rel. Roby v. Boeing Co., 73 F. Supp. 2d 897 (S.D. Ohio 1999) United States ex rel. Roby v. Boeing Co., 184 F.R.D. 107 (S.D. Ohio 1999) United States ex rel. Roby v. Boeing Co., 995 F. Supp. 790 (S.D. Ohio 1998) United States ex rel. Roby v. Boeing Co., 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22456 (S.D. Ohio 1998)
OUTCOME: $6.1 million settlement
This case involved issues relating to the reliability of certain components on F-18 Hornet guidance systems.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
