Cleveland, OH
Criminal defense Lawyer at Cleveland, OH
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense
OUTCOME: Not Guilty
Defendant was charged with vehicular homicide after striking another vehicle. It was reported that the Defendant was traveling at a high rate of speed. The jury found the Defendant guilty of Unsafe V ... ehicle, a Minor Misdemeanor carrying a potential One Hundred Dollar Fine and acquitted him of the Homicide charge.
OUTCOME: Case Dismissed
Doctor charged with numerous sexual offenses including two counts of rape, kidnapping, and gross sexual imposition. The alleged victim was his daughter. After an extensive six month investigation, th ... e Defense motioned the appellate court to hold an evidentiary hearing pursuant to a Writ of Habeas Corpus. Based upon the evidence which was to be presented at the hearing, the State dismissed all counts. Further, a Proclamation of Innocence was obtained on behalf of the client which was signed by the Prosecutors’ office.
OUTCOME: All Evidence Supressed and Case Dismissed
The Defendant was stopped for suspicion of Driving Under the Influence. If convicted, this would have been her third DUI within the statutory six (6) year period. After Field Sobriety Tests were cond ... ucted, the Defendant was placed under arrest for DUI. A Breathalyzer test revealed that the Defendant was almost five (5) times the legal limit. The defense filed a Motion To Suppress alleging that there was no reasonable suspicion justifying the initial stop. After all evidence was presented at the suppression hearing, the Court granted the Motion and all evidence obtained as a result of the stop was excluded from trial. The State dismissed the case.
OUTCOME: Not Guilty
The Defendant was charged with two counts of Aggravated Robbery and two counts of Felonious Assault for allegedly robbing two banks at gunpoint. All counts included one and three year gun specificatio ... ns. Both robberies were consolidated and the trial lasted approximately two weeks. The jury was confronted with eyewitness testimony from the teller who positively identified the Defendant in open court as the individual that had committed the crimes. Through cross-examination and usage of a demonstration showing the unreliability of eyewitness identification, the jury acquitted the Defendant of one count of aggravated robbery, two counts of felonious assault, and all gun specifications. The jury hung on the remaining count of aggravated robbery. Prior to the re-trial of the remaining count, the State dismissed the case.
OUTCOME: Not Guilty
Forty seven year old government employee was indicted for Possession of Heroin and Trafficking in Heroin after a police task force consisting of two local police departments and one federal agency sift ... ed through her trash and executed a warrant for the search of her residence. It was alleged that ten (10) packets of heroin were located in the trash. This case received media attention as it revealed questionable tactics by law enforcement officers after testimony provided that detectives posing as garbage men, randomly seized trash from homes to look for evidence of wrongdoing. After the State rested, the trial court granted the defense motion for acquittal. The defendant was found not guilty on all counts and released.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
