No Photo

John David Latchney

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 6.5

Licensed for 35 years

Employment and labor Lawyer at Sheffield Village, OH
Practice Areas: Employment & Labor, Civil Rights, Litigation ... +2 more

5455 Detroit Rd, Sheffield Village, OH

About John

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Civil Rights 20%

35 years

20%
Litigation 20%

35 years

20%
Education 15%

26 years

15%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Ohio for 35 years

State: Ohio

Acquired: 1990

Active

No misconduct found

Location

O'Toole, Mclaughlin, Dooley & Pecora LPA

5455 Detroit Rd, Sheffield Village, OH, 44054-2904

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

John David Latchney's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

John David Latchney's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse John

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  6.5 (Good)

Sample of Legal Cases

Domingo v Kowalski, 810 F.3d 403 (6th Cir. 2016)

Decision in favor of Defendants affirmed by U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals on appeal.

Lee v. Cardington, 142 Ohio St.3d 488, 2014-Ohio-5458

Victory: Ohio Supreme Court reversed Court of Appeals decision and reinstated summary judgment in favor of employer Village

Kuivila v. City of Conneaut, 430 Fed. Appx. 402; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 14355 (6th Cir. 2011)

District court decision granting summary judgment affirmed on appeal by U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

State ex rel. Duncan v. Vg of Middlefield, 120 Ohio St.3d 313; 2008-Ohio-1891, December 4, 2008 (lead counsel for appellees)

Summary judgment in favor of Village affirmed on direct appeal to Ohio Supreme Court

Coles v. Granville, 448 F.3d 853 (6th Cir. 2006)

Decision in favor of MetroParks affirmed on appeal in U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals (superseded/overruled Kruse v. Chagrin Falls)

McDermott v. City of N. Olmsted, 178 Fed.Appx. 515; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 10929 (6th Cir. 2006)

Enforcement of settlement affirmed on appeal by U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Anderson v. Ravenna Twp. Fire Dep't, 159 Fed. Appx. 619; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 23917 (6th Cir. 2005)

District court decision granting summary judgment affirmed on appeal by U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Walsh v. Cuyahoga County Bd. of Health, 424 F.3d 510 (6th Cir. 2005)

Adverse decision reversed on appeal by U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in favor of management employee, who was afforded qualified immunity

Naples v. Lowellville Police Dep't, 125 Fed. Appx. 636; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 3852 (6th Cir. 2005)

District court decision granting summary judgment affirmed on appeal by U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

D'Amico v. City of Strongsville, 59 Fed. Appx. 675; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 3440(6th Cir. 2003)

District court decision granting summary judgment affirmed on appeal by U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Virostek v. Liberty Twp. Police Department/Trustees, 14 Fed. Appx. 493; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 15909 (6th Cir. 2001)

District court denying back pay and attorney's fees affirmed on appeal by U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Curby v. Archon (Village of Windham), 216 F.3d 549 (6th Cir. 2000)

Summary judgment on USERRA and procedural due process claims by village police officer affirmed on appeal

State ex rel. Minor v. Eschen, 74 Ohio St.3d 134; 1995 Ohio 264; 656 N.E.2d 940

Denial of writ of mandamus reversed on appeal in favor of plaintiff-employee

Roth v. Village of West Salem, 616 Fed.Appx. 794, 2015 WL 3824962 (6th Cir. 2015)

District court decision granting summary judgment affirmed on appeal by U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

See More Legal Cases

Education

N/A

Cleveland State University

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution