Free Consultation
$0 first 45 minutes
Karin has over 20 years of experience in appellate work, beginning with almost six years of experience as a Staff Attorney at the Court of Appeals. In private practice, Karin has handled over 200 appellate cases for clients, winning a significant percentage of cases.
1
Practice Area
22 years
Free Consultation
$0 first 45 minutes
$ 300-350 per hour
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: Ohio
Acquired: 2004
No misconduct found
316 N. Michigan St., Suite 600, Toledo, OH, 43604
9 Client Reviews
Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Case Results
Posted by Tina | October 16, 2013 | Lawsuits & Disputes
If you want it done fast, and want it done right, hire Karin.
If you have a legal issue, and you would like it to be taken care of efficiently and professionally, hire Karin Coble. Karin helped my husband and I with an issue that regarded settling for an amount which actually turned out to be much less than we had anticipated, (meaning much for favorable to us)...
"Karin is an excellent researcher and appellate brief writer. Has innate knowledge about what judges want in a brief. Efficient, accurate, and responsive. I really enjoy co-counseling with Karin."
"I highly endorse Karin Coble as your lawyer. She has a superior grasp of the law and workings of the Court of Appeals. Her briefs are succinct and compelling. Her oral arguments are smooth and effective. She has cogent and persuasive responses to the Judges' questions. I think that you will be very pleased with her representation."
"I have worked with Karin on a number of legal and other matters. She is a very intelligent and hard working attorney. You can not go wrong hiring Karin Coble as your attorney."
"I strongly endorse Karin Coble. Whenever I need a well-reasoned, legally sound brief or memorandum for a case, I always turn to Karin. Her research and writing skills are unmatched, and her work product is always top notch. I always encourage my clients to hire Karin if they need to proceed to the appellate court. There is no one better for appeals."
"I can recommend Karin without reservation. She is a capable and dedicated attorney who cares deeply for her clients. I would trust her to represent me and you should too."
Family lawyer
Wrongful termination lawyer
1997
George P. Guthrie Scholarship in Philosophy, George P. Guthrie
2013 - Present
Attorney, Law Office of Karin Coble, Esq.
2010 - 2013
Of Counsel, Albrechta & Coble, Ltd
2004 - 2010
Staff Attorney, Ohio Sixth District Court of Appeals
2018 - Present
Toledo Junior Bar AssociationPast President
Executive Committee Member
2018 - 2020
Lucas County Bar AssociationSecretary
2017 - 2020
Toledo Women's Bar AssociationExecutive Committee
2016 - 2018
Toledo Civilian Police Review BoardVice-Chair
2016 - 2018
Toledo Lucas County Homelessness BoardBoard Member
reversed and conviction vacated
reversed in favor of client
reversed and conviction vacated
reversed in favor of client
Reversed in client's favor
Dismissed in Client's favor
Reversed in client's favor
Affirmed in Client's favor
Guilty plea reversed; conviction vacated
Conviction for RICO vacated for insufficient evidence
Reversed in client's favor
Sentence reversed and case remanded
Conviction vacated
Writ of prohibition granted
Reversed and vacated in client's favor
Sentence reversed and case remanded
Conviction vacated
Sentence and fines vacated
Murder conviction reversed
Conviction and sentence vacated
Reversed and acquitted
Plea and conviction vacated
Sentence reversed.
Reversed and acquitted
Reversed
Contempt vacated
Guilty plea vacated. Client's plea was unknowing because court failed to inform her of sex offender registration requirements.
On appeal, acquitted of felony compelling prostitution and acquitted of two felony counts of attempted pandering obscenity. Case also held that sentence was contrary to law, and client received new sentencing hearing.
On appeal, vacated guilty pleas as unknowing and involuntary and vacated sentence
On appeal, reversed sentence. Firearm specifications should have merged into single sentence, and consecutive sentences for all counts had to be vacated. Client received new sentencing hearing.
On appeal, vacated guilty pleas because prosecutor did not abide by plea bargain. Convictions and sentence vacated.
On appeal, charge was reversed and dismissed, because the prosecution and trial court violated client's speedy trial rights.
On appeal, found post-release control was void and sentenced was erased. Client immediately released from prison because sentence was void.
2004
J.D.
2001
M.A.
1996
B.A.
2018
Feminism and the Rules of Ethics - CLE
2017
Mentoring Our Sisters In Law - CLE
2014
Navigating Transitions
2001
English