No Photo

Dean E Swartz

5.0
Rating: 8.2

Licensed for 51 years

Medical malpractice Lawyer at New Albany, OH
Practice Areas: Medical Malpractice

7816 Jonell Square, Lower Level, New Albany, OH

About Dean

Biography

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Medical Malpractice 100%

Swartz & Reed is an AV-rated lawfirm (Martindale-Hubbell) that limits its practice to the representation of victims of medical malpractice who have suffered a catastrophic injury or death. Please visit us at www.SwartzReed.com. We handle cases against the United States anywhere in the world and, through the association of local lawyers, throughout the nation.

52 years

100%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 120 minutes

Contingency

20%-40%


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in District of Columbia for 49 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 1976

Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in Pennsylvania for 43 years

State: Pennsylvania

Acquired: 1982

Retired

No misconduct found

Licensed in Ohio for 51 years

State: Ohio

Acquired: 1974

Inactive

No misconduct found

Location

Swartz & Reed

7816 Jonell Square, Lower Level, New Albany, OH, 43054

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Dean E Swartz's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

1 Client Review

5 star (1)
4 star (0)
3 star (0)
2 star (0)
1 star (0)

Posted by Marjorie | May 24, 2015

The Truth Doesn't Always Win

After working with him for 4 years, I am honored to write this review of his impressive performance in and out of the courtroom. I have been inspired by his high level of professionalism. From the time I first met him, I always felt confident of his ability to represent me. Since I am in my eighties,... I was pleased that he was patient, understanding, and compassionate working with me. He always made me feel that my input was valuable, both in and out of the courtroom. He entered the courtroom well-armed with his knowledge from years of research in the form of phone calls, live interviews, and online information. His fabulous opening statement captivated both the jury and the defense, leaving them on the edges of their chairs. To show the jury the exact measurements, he had life-size photos as well as props to demonstrate the relationship of the size of my tumors compared to the original size of my breasts. From his exceptional delivery, I knew he had the knowledge, the desire, and the integrity to win my case. I knew he had anticipated every possible argument the defense could present. I was impressed by his creative resourcefulness, not only for gathering evidence but also for his ability to build hope in his clients. I felt he was totally committed to my case, regardless of the time and expense required. I never doubted that he had my best interests in every decision he made. Although he was 3 time zones away, he was always with me--through emails and phone calls--as if he was right next door. He flew here 7 times, never worrying about the cost or the personal inconvenience. His mastery of multi-media equipment showed his superiority over the defense. After the trial, even they were impressed enough to ask him about the equipment he used. He kept the jurors' interest by breaking down all medical terms, so anyone could understand them. Even with his hands literally tied behind his back, he stayed focus to win the case. When he was not allowed to show the jury the pre-recorded depositions containing winning evidence, he demonstrated honesty and integrity by letting me voluntarily drop the case to prevent years of appeal, due to my age and health. He deserves the highest possible rating because he is intelligent without being arrogant. He is knowledgeable and has great people skills. I was always proud to have him represent me. I'd definitely recommend him to anyone. Most of all, I am grateful for all the time and expense he went through flying to many states to gather depositions from witnesses and medical experts. I believe he is the best attorney, not just in the United States, but in the world. Without reservation, I believe he should receive the highest rating because he definitely surpasses all the necessary requirements in every category.

See All Client Reviews

Dean E Swartz's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Dean

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  8.2 (Excellent)

Honors

2015

Top Rated Lawyers in Medical Malpractice, The American Lawyer

2014

Top Lawyers, Columbus C.E.O. magazine

1999

Certified Civil Trial Advocate, National Board of Trial Advocacy

1997

Member, Million Dollar Advocates Forum

1985

AV Rating, Martindale-Hubbell

1973

Order of Barristers, International Order of Barristers

1970

Chapin Award in Forensics, Stanford University

1966

The Harvard Book, Associated Harvard Clubs

Work Experience

1979 - 1980

Special Ass't to the General Counsel, US Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

1975 - 1978

Captain, USMCR, United States Marine Corps Headquarters

Associations

2007 - Present

American Association for Justice

Section on Federal Tort Liability and Military Advocacy

2002 - Present

Ohio State Bar Association

Member

2000 - 2001

Association of Trial Lawyers of America

President's Club

1986 - 1994

Trial Lawyers Association of Metropolitan Washington, D.C.

Board of Governors

Sample of Legal Cases

Bond v. Ivanjack, 740 A.2d 968 (D.C. 1999)

Verdict of $1.5 million affirmed.

See More Legal Cases

Education

1974

University of Toledo College of Law

JD

1971

Stanford University

A.B.

Speaking Engagements

2000

Brown Bag Lunch Series

Insurance Bad Faith

1999

Litigation Support Seminar

How to Support your Lawyer

1999

Belli Seminars

F.R.Civ.P. 36 Requests for Admissions

1998

Neurology Department Grand Rounds

Medical Malpractice Litigation

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution