Indianapolis, IN
Lawsuits and disputes Lawyer at Indianapolis, IN
Practice Areas: Lawsuits & Disputes
OUTCOME: Reversed
Indiana Court of Appeals ruled that insurance company has a duty to defend retailer and security company in a lawsuit alleging that a security guard assaulted a customer believed to have committed thef ... t.
OUTCOME: The conviction was affirmed.
The Supreme Court, through Chief Justice Shepard, held that imposition of additional fixed term based on defendant's actual use of firearm during commission of the crime involving mere possession of de ... adly weapon did not violate the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy.
OUTCOME: Affirmed
In it's 2007 Annual Report, the Indiana Supreme Court stated that Gutermuth v. State, 868 N.E.2d 427 (Ind. 2007) was the leading case, which held that a “Blakely claim” is not available to criminal def ... endants whose sentences were entered before Blakely and who did not appeal their sentences within the normal range provided with the rules.
OUTCOME: Reversed
The Indiana Supreme Court addressed the sufficiency of a defendant's burglary conviction.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
