James Lee Widrig

PRO

James Lee Widrig

3.7
Rating: 9.3

Licensed for 20 years

Divorce and separation Lawyer at Brentwood, TN
Practice Areas: Divorce & Separation, Child Custody, Family, Child Support

101 Westpark Drive, Suite 260, Brentwood, TN

Virtual Consultation Available

Free Consultation

About James

Biography

Practice Areas

4

Practice Areas

Divorce and Separation 60%

60%
Child Custody 20%

20%
Child Support 10%

10%
Family 10%

10%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes

Hourly Rates

$ 250-400 per hour


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Licenses

Licensed in Tennessee for 20 years

State: Tennessee

Acquired: 2006

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Widrig Law PLLC

101 Westpark Drive, Suite 260, Brentwood, TN, 37027

WidrigLaw.com

James Lee Widrig's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

3.7 /5.0

3 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (3) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 2
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 1
Practice Areas

Showing 1 - 3 of 3 reviews

Posted by anonymous | July 18, 2019 | Hired Attorney | Divorce & Separation

Experienced, Intelligent and Client Advocate

Jim Widrig represented me during my divorce and what I most appreciated about him was guidance through a difficult time. Divorce can be very stressful and in my case, it was fast and hard. During some of the most challenging points of my litigation, Jim reminded me that this is a long game. When you ...are involved in a divorce with children it can be emotion-filled. His experience and understanding what was most important to me (children/custody) allowed him to provide the best advice. He was absolutely right about the most likely outcome and provided me all of my options. The divorce might not have gone the way I thought in the beginning but at the end of it all, I was really pleased with the outcome.

Posted by anonymous | November 06, 2011

VERY PROFESSIONAL

Very thorough, knowledgable of the law and procedures, very straight forward. Mr Widrig brings respect to law practice. He has always been responsive to phone calls and emails. We have not felt that he has over charged for the services he has performed for us. Definitely recommended!!!

Posted by anonymous | March 30, 2022 | Hired Attorney | Contracts & Agreements

Overcharged without communicating

Out of the blue, he sent me a surprise bill that was more than double the agreed amount for a simple legal matter. When confronted, he admitted that he did not communicate this change, yet still tried to collect on the overcharge. Poor communication and unapologetic. Felt like he was trying to take... advantage of me.

James Widrig

Replied last March 31, 2022

When you take the witness stand in court there is a reason why they ask you to swear to tell the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. The whole truth is different from half/ partial truths. Half/partial truths change the perception of what really happened. You were not sent any surprise bill out of the blue. You received your first month’s statement. Your statement for this current month should be sent to you shortly. All clients receive a monthly invoice outlining all of the time spent on each task for that month and how much each individual task cost. (Example phone call with client. Time spent 0.1. Charge $35) You did not dispute that any of the work in the bill was actually performed nor did you dispute the quality of the work; in fact you emailed me about how thorough it was. You were just upset about the amount of the bill. You may have been surprised by the amount of the bill, but that does not make it a surprise bill out of the blue. Again, you requested additional services be performed outside of the quote that the initial retainer was for, so this is not a surprise bill sent out of the blue. It was your monthly statement/bill. Again your next month's statement will be sent shortly. Also you were not overcharged. Again, the legal representation agreement you signed is for an hourly fee. It was not a flat fee. That was communicated to you upfront on the phone and it’s clearly stated in the contract you signed with my office. The Legal Representation Agreement even has it in bold that the initial retainer is an estimate and it is not a flat fee agreement. When you and I spoke on the phone about the charges on your first monthly statement I stated to you that I did not specifically tell you verbally that the additional work you requested would cost you more money as I assumed you understood that additional work equated to additional fees. Reviewing a prenuptial agreement and redrafting a prenuptial agreement are different tasks. I should not need to apologize for performing the additional services that you requested be performed; nor should you expect those additional services be completed for free. You were not taken advantage of, and as I said before I am sorry you feel that way. However, you are correct in that I am unapologetic for doing the extra work that you requested be done, which you later used, and I am unapologetic for expecting someone to pay for services that they request. I did apply a substantial courtesy discount to your first month’s bill and have previously informed you that I was also not charging you for work that was performed in this month’s statement. Again you were not overcharged for anything. I would be happy to talk about any individual charges on your account if you like as I try hard to make sure clients are happy with the services that we provide for them. However, I do take issue with your statement that the communication between us was poor. You were charged for all phone calls, emails, and meetings between us. I find it confusing that you are upset that you were charged too much but also are upset that the communication was poor. You can’t have it both ways. You either have good communication and are charged for all those events under the hourly agreement that you signed, or you do not have good communication and you would not be charged as much because again there is no communication. Without communication there is nothing to charge you for. You can't have it both ways; you don't get your cake and eat it too. Again, please let me know if you have any questions about the individual charges on your next monthly statement.

See All Client Reviews

James Lee Widrig's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse James
Michael S. Waddington headshot
Michael Waddington

Family lawyer | May 26

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse James. He is a highly skilled attorney that is well respected in the legal community."

David Lee Scott headshot
David Scott

Divorce and separation lawyer | Nov 11

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I have known this lawyer for a few years and have always found him to be a person of integrity and well-qualified in the practice of law."

Jacob Robert Nemer headshot
Jacob Nemer

Family lawyer | Oct 24

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Jim is an intelligent and experienced attorney who always puts his clients first. I highly recommend him for family law matters."

Trudy Lynn Bloodworth headshot
Trudy Bloodworth

Divorce and separation lawyer | Aug 09

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. Mr. Widrig has been opposing counsel on several matters and successfully mediated cases for my clients. He is knowledgeable, professional and respectful. He is an excellent attorney and is well liked by the Court and members of the bar."

Rachel Sharp Upshaw headshot
Rachel Upshaw

Family lawyer | Mar 28

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. I have had several cases against Jim, and he is always well-prepared and effectively represents his clients. He is also well-respected by fellow attorneys."

Karla Cauthen Miller headshot
Karla Miller

Family lawyer | Mar 26

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse James Widrig. Jim is a great attorney who works hard for his clients. He is very knowledgeable about family law and is creative in his solutions for his clients. He's also great in the courtroom! He is respected by his peers as well as the domestic law judges, and he is always prepared for his cases."

View All Endorsements
Rachel Sharp Upshaw headshot
Rachel Upshaw

Family lawyer

Experience

Rating:  9.3 (Superb)

Honors

2025

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2024

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2023

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2015

10 Best Under 40, American Institute of Family Law Attorneys

2015

10 Best, American Institute of Legal Counsel

2014

10 Best Family Law Attorneys Under 40, National Academy Of Family Law Attorneys

2014

10 Best Under 40, American Institute of Family Law Attorneys

2014

10 Best, American Institute of Legal Counsel

2011

Best Lawyers, Nashville Scene

Work Experience

2007 - Present

Attorney, Widrig Law PLLC

2006 - 2007

Attorney, Mills and Cooper

Associations

2010 - Present

Rutherford Cannon County Bar Association

2006 - Present

Tennessee Bar Association

Member

Nashville Bar Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

In Re Madilene G. R

Our client's parental rights were upheld and he was given custody of his child

FREEMON v. LOGAN'S ROADHOUSE, INC.

Our clients case against Logan's Roadhouse was not dismissed and was allowed to go forward

See More Legal Cases

Education

2005

Thomas M. Cooley Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

2002

Carson-Newman College

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

Publications

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution