I.C.E. Contractors, Inc., v. Martin & Cobey Const. Co., Inc., 58 So.3d 723 (Ala. 2010).

N/A

OUTCOME: Upon remand, and counterclaim by general contractor, parties reached amicable resolution of dispute.

Subcontractor brought breach-of-contract claim against general contractor, alleging general contractor's failure to pay for construction materials and/or equipment supplied by subcontractor.

Harrison v. Benchmark Elec. Huntsville, Inc., 593 F. 3d 1206 (11th Cir. 2010).

N/A

OUTCOME: Resolved, after remand.

Temporary employee brought action alleging violation(s) of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Furin v. City of Huntsville, 3 So. 3d 256 (Ala. Civ. App. 2008).

N/A

OUTCOME: Trial court entered summary judgment in favor of city, and Court of Civil Appeals affirmed.

Landowners brought trespass, negligence, nuisance, and inverse-condemnation claims against city after their properties flooded following a heavy rain.

Western Sur. Co. v. Bradford Elec. Co., Inc., 483 F.Supp. 2d 1114 (N.D. Ala. 2007).

N/A

OUTCOME: Not Applicable (to general contractor client).

Surety brought diversity action against subcontractor regarding performance and payment bonds, following settlement of underlying dispute.

Consolidated Const. Co. of Alabama v. Metal Bldg. Components, L.P., 961 So. 2d 820 (Ala. 2007)

N/A

OUTCOME:

Watkins v. City of Huntsville, 176 Fed. Appx. 955 (11th Cir. 2006), reh., reh. en banc denied, 186 Fed. Appx. (11th Cir. 2006).

N/A

OUTCOME: Trial court entered summary judgment in favor of city, and Court of Appeals affirmed.

Former city employee sued city for racial discrimination and retaliation.

City of Huntsville v. Lane, 897 So. 2d 275 (Ala. 2004).

N/A

OUTCOME: Subsequently resolved by agreement.

Property owners sued developers and city, alleging that owners' basement flooded due to development and that city failed to properly maintain creek channels.

Pennington v. City of Huntsville, 261 F.3d 1262 (11th Cir. 2001).

N/A

OUTCOME: Trial court entered summary judgment in favor of city, and Court of Appeals affirmed.

Employee of city parks and recreation department brought action against city for discrimination on basis of race and religion and for retaliation under Title VII.