Gregory Jefferson Kramer

Gregory Jefferson Kramer

3.4
Rating: 9.0

Licensed for 44 years

Divorce and separation Lawyer at Bradenton, FL
Practice Areas: Divorce & Separation, Family, Uncontested Divorce, Alimony

345 6th Ave W Ste 20, Bradenton, FL

About Gregory

Biography

Practice Areas

4

Practice Areas

Divorce and Separation 50%

Assisting clients divorcing or separating

45 years | 3,600 cases

50%
Family 20%

Assisting families

45 years | 3,600 cases

20%
Alimony 10%

Assisting clients receiving support

45 years | 3,600 cases

10%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes

Retainer

Always


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Florida for 44 years

State: Florida

Acquired: 1981

Member in Good Standing

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Gregory Jefferson Kramer

345 6th Ave W Ste 20, Bradenton, FL, 34205-8820

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Gregory Jefferson Kramer's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

3.4 /5.0

5 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (5) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 reviews | Practice Area Knowledge

Posted by anonymous | August 16, 2018 | Hired Attorney | Child Support

Find Someone (Anyone) Else

First of all, Greg Kramer does nothing, his Clerk (Wayne) does all of the work. BUT the clerk does not go to Court. So Kramer, who does not keep up-to-date on the info, is the one actually representing you. Anything you give to Kramer will not make it to the Clerk (I gave Kramer original documents th...at never made it to the clerk, had to re-complete my intake form, etc). There is a lack of communication between Kramer and the Clerk. They rack up legal bills and give no results. Clerk wrote lots of motions and files (and subsequently charged me for his time), then they would not use them. For example, they unilaterally decided to do Contempt of Court on the opposite party when he didn’t pay his child support, spent a lot of my time writing emails, motions, etc. Then it all just disappeared. When I asked what happened the clerk said, “No contempt. Greg made that decision and it had been already removed from prior hearing.” I was not asked to start or stop that process, but I was charged. That is just one example of many where they wasted my money in that manner. Kramer gave terrible advice. The #1 reason I got a lawyer was so they could guide me through the process and help me know what outcome to expect. Kramer is either ignorant to how judges typically rule in family court OR purposefully misled me in order to make money off of me. I suspect a little of both. When the opposing counsel asked us to go to mediation, Kramer and his Clerk told me not to go and to wait until after the first court date. They continually reassured me that nothing would happen at the court date (which they set) except appointment of a GAL and a Social Investigation. Kramer recommended and set up this court date and then was completely unprepared. Nor did he prepare me (I called him multiple times asking to meet, and he kept saying we had plenty of time). As one small example (I have many) the opposing lawyer had a document that I had originally provided for evidence at the beginning of the legal process. Kramer tried to object to it and the opposing counsel reminded him “your office filed this.” To make matters more laughable, Kramer then asked if the opposing counsel had printed a copy for him. Kramer had zero evidence, made zero points, alienated the judge in his opening statement (and actually argued when the judge corrected him until the judge said that he could stop and read the transcripts if necessary). He was not credible in court at all. Kramer simply talked in circles. He obviously just likes to hear himself talk, but there is no substance being said. Our Guardian Ad Litem told me Greg “did not advocate for you at all.” The opposing counsel stated that Greg “made a fool of himself.” Greg emailed me hours after the trial saying he was sorry, but also deflecting blame from himself. One day later he emailed me saying that he assumed I wanted him to withdraw and that they would prepare a final bill and the paperwork for withdraw. The next day the clerk messaged me saying, “Mr. Kramer thinks you will be seeking new counsel. Is that correct?” Kramer pushed me very hard to let him leave the case. So Kramer did not do his job, which put me in a terrible position, and then immediately wanted to withdraw from the case. He charged me a significant amount of money, got me no results, and then left me scrambling to find another lawyer to fix what he had ruined. Terrible. He is the exact type of lawyer that gives lawyers a bad name. He does no work and does not care about his clients. He needs to retire.

Gregory Kramer

Replied last August 16, 2018

I know this client and she is a very loving Mother. She was forced to raise her son for a meaningful period of time without the support of the biological legal Father. She came to me with a difficult case, seeking to limit if not prevent the Father from coming back into the young Son’s life. After all, the Mother had remarried a lovely Man and she with him had raised the son without much help or interference from the Father. From day one, before I was retained, I counseled the Mother my client, that, it would be extremely difficult to prevent a reunification with the Father. But put yourself in her shoes. She adored her son and had done all the heavy lifting in and towards his care. Our day in Court was very unfortunate. From the beginning the Court was not sympathetic to our request to reunite the Son and Father slowly over a period of time. The Father presented extremely well, as he had obtained an education, established that he had never abandoned his Son and now wanted a significant time-sharing with the Son over parts of summer, holidays and when he could come to Bradenton as he lived out of state. The Father’s requests were reasonable under the law and facts as they applied to the law. Naturally, I was adamant and sincere in attempting to achieve my client’s desires. Unfortunately, the Court was unsympathetic and not convinced by our factual presentation. I could see that we were losing ground with the court and I needed to salvage what we could. I suggested and the Court did allow the parties and attorneys to meet in private to attempt reaching a settlement. The Father and his attorney offered the original terms which significantly limited the Father’s time with his Son. I vehemtly urged the Mother to accept the offer. She refused and insisted on being heard further. After exhausting all favorable questions, I allowed the Mother to go into narrative, without any objections from the other side. She was given free reign over 30; minutes to explain uninterrupted why it would harm the child to see the Father. She miserably failed and angered the Judge to the point he admonished her and ordered her to take special parenting classes. Yes the proceeding that day produced a disfavorable outcome and further was a little disconcerting as I allowed the Mother to simply express out of frustration in her own words why the court should restrict the Father rights to the Son. In conclusion, here we have a very nice but naive client, seeking a very difficult goal and sabotaging her own case by not following her attorney’s advice.. After the hearing the Mother was extremely rude to me. It was clear she had lost all confidence in me. She accused me of being on the Father’s side. My law clerk was showing additional fees were due. In totality of the circumstances I suggested to my client she might want to retain a different attorney and I would forgive any additional fees due. To save money and in light of Father living out of town very little discovery had been conducted before trial. At trial the Mother’s version simply did not hold up. Ultimately the parties’ reached an agreement. The good news is the Son will have two good parents and a very close step- Father. I wish all the parties’ well.

Posted by anonymous | July 05, 2017 | Divorce & Separation

Divorce

Worst lawyer. Sat through our mediation and said nothing. Brought no paperwork. Had to call his assistant to get answers to any questions. A number of things that we agreed to in the settlement were not in the final paper and he missed it. Did not explain what a QDRO is. Now its tax time and I am pay...ing taxes on money that my X received. Called to ask him about a filing a contempt charge against X who was not following agreement. He quoted me over 2000 to just file the charge. I got the paperwork from the courthouse and did it myself for 50$. Stay away from this guy. He is the worst.

Gregory Kramer

Replied last July 05, 2017

This does not sound like a client I represented. If in fact you are a client of mine, please contact me and I will attempt to redress your grievance.

See All Client Reviews

Gregory Jefferson Kramer's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Gregory
Paul Fleming Grondahl headshot
Paul Grondahl

Family lawyer | Jul 13

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"I endorse Gregory Kramer. He is a very competent attorney. I have known Greg for many years, having had numerous cases against him. He is always prepared; he has a thorough understanding of the law and the rules of evidence; he knows how to present a case effectively to the Court; and he acts professionally at all times. My experience with and trust in Greg has been such that I have referred clients to him with total confidence."

Alexander Jude Virgil headshot
Alexander Virgil

Family lawyer | Jul 05

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. Very straight forward and cares about his clients. I worked with Greg on a very sensitive case and he handled it with the utmost professionalism. He met all of our client's needs."

Faith Z. Brown headshot
Faith Brown

Family lawyer | Jun 27

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"Greg is a brilliant attorney for whom I have great respect. He is intelligent, personable, and cares very deeply about his clients and his work. He is a highly effective litigator. I have consulted with him on cases in the past, and would not hesitate to refer clients to him in the future."

Edward Brian Sobel headshot
Edward Sobel

Education lawyer | Jun 24

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. Experienced, knowledgeable, compassionate, a great family law attorney."

Stanley Robert Swartz headshot
Stanley Swartz

Family lawyer | Jun 23

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. I've had cases with and against Greg. He has always been professional and reasonable. He has a Christian heart and is dedicated to the best interests of his clients, even when I am opposing him in a case. He practices mostly Family law and is extremely knowledgeable in his field."

View All Endorsements
Paul Fleming Grondahl headshot
Paul Grondahl

Family lawyer

Faith Z. Brown headshot
Faith Brown

Family lawyer

Edward Brian Sobel headshot
Edward Sobel

Family lawyer

Stanley Robert Swartz headshot
Stanley Swartz

Family lawyer

Experience

Rating:  9.0 (Superb)

Honors

2017

Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2015

Pro Bono Award, Florida Bar

Work Experience

1981 - Present

Owner, Law Office Of Gregory Kramer

Associations

1981 - Present

Supreme Court of Florida

Member

1981 - Present

Federal Middle District Court of Florida

Member

1981 - Present

Florida Bar

Member

Education

1981

Northern Kentucky University, Salmon P. Chase College of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1978

University of Louisville

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution