John P Rutkowski

John P Rutkowski

3.9
Rating: 8.3

Licensed for 30 years

Criminal defense Lawyer at Punta Gorda, FL
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense

3941 Tamiami Trail, Suite 3157-211, Punta Gorda, FL

About John

Biography

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Criminal Defense 100%

Criminal Defense, Post Conviction Relief, Criminal Appeals, DUI, BUI, Traffic Offenses

31 years | 250 cases

100%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Georgia for 27 years

State: Georgia

Acquired: 1998

Emeritus

No misconduct found

Licensed in Florida for 30 years

State: Florida

Acquired: 1995

Member in Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in Pennsylvania for 15 years

State: Pennsylvania

Acquired: 2010

Retired

No misconduct found

Location

John P Rutkowski, Attorney at Law

3941 Tamiami Trail, Suite 3157-211, Punta Gorda, FL, 33950

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

John P Rutkowski's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

3.9 /5.0

15 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (15) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 5 of 6 reviews | Responsiveness

Posted by Brandon Hall | October 19, 2017 | Criminal Defense

He is not there for you

I had a case that lasted 2 years with Mr. Rutkowski. During this time he never provided my discovery packet, although I repeatedly asked for it. He moved out of state without my knowledge. When my court date came around he made it very obvious that he had other business in PA where he moved. In the e...nd, I received the same deal that I could have got on my own with a public defender. In my opinion, he will not fight for you in court and will only do what accommodates his life. I will say with certainty that he is not a good lawyer. What else can you expect from a former FHP officer?

John Rutkowski

Replied last October 19, 2017

I was able to get Brandon's charges reduced and he recieved probation. I did relocate and I advised Brandon of my move. Brandon did not voice any displeasure, to me, concerning my representation of him. And at the time I relocated Brandon relocated from Atlanta to southwest Florida. I attended all of Brandon's hearing and kept in close telephone contact. On several appearances I was able to have the judge excuse Brandon so he did not have to travel to court. Had I be aware Brandon was upset with my representation may be we could have talked the issues out. Unfortunately I had no idea until this review.

Posted by Kristina | October 19, 2017 | Divorce & Separation

Divorce and Custody

I hired John to represent my daughter and her 4 children in Divorce/Custody case. At first, he seemed interested but as time went on, a very short period of time, she could see clearly that he was not all that interested. In the short period of time he was her attorney - an abusive husband who flew... under the radar for 10 years got 50% time visitation - absolutely unheard of. He was NON supportive to my family when we needed legal support the most. He told my daughter on more than one occasion that he didn't have time to answer all her emails and texts. I'm sure he is a good criminal defense lawyer, but if you need a FAMILY lawyer - look elsewhere. I ended up retaining another attorney so the almost 4,000 we paid him was just flushed down the drain

John Rutkowski

Replied last October 19, 2017

This was a very contentious and stressful divorce for the parties. My client ended up hiring a firing four attorneys over the course of the litigation. I wish I could have gotten her full custody, however, Equal Custody Trumps Long Commute to School Brian Vertz April 12, 2015 Child Custody, Court Decisions When one parent moves to a new neighborhood after having equal shared custody, the move might cause a longer commute time for a children traveling to and from school. In a recent published decision, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania considered whether it was reasonable to shift primary custody to one parent in order to limit the child’s commuting time. In R.S. v. T.T., 2015 Pa. Super. 72 (April 10, 2015), the mother of a 6 year old child was awarded primary custody because equally shared custody would require the child to commute up to 40 minutes to and from school if he stayed with Father during the week. Both parents agreed that a shared custody schedule would require the child to spend too much time riding back and forth in a car. Mother testified that a shared custody schedule had become impractical when the child start to attend full day elementary school, as it would prevent the child from establishing predictable routines and establishing roots. The trial court agreed, holding that the commuting would undermine the child’s stability. The Superior Court disagreed, overturning the trial court’s decision. First, the Court noted that Mother and Father had not agreed to terminate the shared custody arrangement in order to avoid commuting. Next, the Court held that a child’s attachment to his parent was more important than avoidance of a 40 minute daily commute. The Court even suggested a week on/week off custody schedule to minimize the number of weekly custody exchanges. The Court also emphasize the importance of considering all ramifications stemming from a change in the custody arrangement. Finding that the trial court had not adequately considering the potential damage to the child’s relationship with his father, the Superior Court vacated the order.

Posted by anonymous | December 10, 2012 | Lawsuits & Disputes

Didn't give me a clear path forward

At first Mr. Rutkowski seemed very sympathetic to my plight. However, as time went on, he seemed less concerned about the outcome of my case. While I thought he was a very nice man, he seemed preoccupied with more important cases. He often traveled to other states in which he passed the bar, makin...g it difficult to catch up with him. It was difficult to have papers reviewed when he was several states away. There were often long lags and poor follow-up. I felt that he didn't ask pertinent questions to me nor did he push for an ideal outcome. The self-confidence that he had upon first meeting seemed to have eroded. That is unfortunate, as I believe he is a good person. I think a lawyer who does not split time between far away states would be a better option.

John Rutkowski

Replied last March 11, 2013

Client was arrested and charged with Obtaining a Prescription Narcotic by forgery. This was Client’s first arrest and I believed she may have been eligible for placement in Montgomery County’s ARD program. I knew that placement in ARD would be difficult due to the nature of the charge and I told the Client that. An alternate consideration, if Client was not accepted in to ARD was Drug Court. Both successful competition of ARD or the Drug Court would result in the charge being dismissed and Client would have been eligible to have her record expunged. I, along with Client’s doctor, worked very hard trying to convince the District Attorney’s Office that Client was a good candidate for ARD. This was her first arrest and she had stressing family and mental health issues which caused her to act out of the norm. The District Attorney’s Office disagreed with ARD, because they believed my Client had drug addiction, and offered drug treatment court as an alternative. Client was informed the District Attorney rejected ARD, but accepted drug court. Client vehemently denied any drug addiction and declined participation in drug court. Client released me from further representation and retained other counsel. To date Client has not been placed in ARD or Drug Treatment Court and it appears from the docket Cleint’s second attorney has ask the Court to be permitted to withdraw as counsel. I am licensed in Pennsylvania, Florida and Georgia. And on two occasions Client called me when I was in Georgia on a case, however, I spoke with Client each time and provided her with whatever information she was seeking. I am sorry that my Client was not satisfied with my representation however; she was not eligible for ARD and refused to participate in Drug Court. I do not believe any of my other cases were at fault in this outcome. John Rutkowski

Posted by anonymous | September 08, 2011 | Criminal Defense

bench warrant

for almost 22 years i had an open bench warrant, these 22 years i had a lfe but was not living, being impressed by Mr Rutkowski's, website and track record of helping good people who blundered, i contacted Mr Rutkowski explained my situation, he immediately checked my background he noted it was an ol...d case, he could advocate on my behalf and I might not have to attend the hearing, but could not determine an outcome of the case, the conversation alone with Mr Rutkowski gave me a gut feeling, this attorney could be trusted and would do his best to help me, Mr Rutkowski as a defence attorney was the best decision I made in my entire life, the cases was called up and dismissed, I hold Mr Rutkowski in high regard and will recommend him to all good people who had a brush with the law and had been brushed off. thanks Mr Rutkowski. May God bless you more and God bless the USA

Posted by Lauren | June 20, 2011 | DUI & DWI

Fantastic Lawyer

John was an incredible lawyer. My fiance and I hired him for 2 - 10 year old dui cases and a possession case. After dealing with a lawyer that made my fiance and I feel like morons that didn't deserve his time he was a breath of fresh air. He took as much time as necessary to explain things to us to ...make sure we understood. He was never in a rush to stop talking to me even though I knew he had many other cases and I had questions for him everyday! He was always honest with us and made sure we understood what was going on and what could happen and what he was trying to have happen. He answered every phone call, email or text message quickly. He went to speak with my fiance while he was incarcerated which was very appreciated. I hope to never need to hire a lawyer again but if I do I'm glad we know John. As far as the outcome he got us better results then we could have hoped for. For 2 dui's he told us to expect 2 - 48 hour sentences and my fiance got 6-12 months probation. For the possession charge it was dismissed. Thanks again John!

See All Client Reviews

John P Rutkowski's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse John
Jason R. Young headshot
Jason Young

Criminal defense lawyer | Jan 11

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. His contributions in this community demonstrate he is a knowledgeable and skilled advocate for his clients."

Illon Ross Fish headshot
Illon Fish

Criminal defense lawyer | Feb 10

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Amanda Elizabeth O'Driscoll headshot
Amanda O'Driscoll

Divorce and separation lawyer | Dec 22

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. He is an asset to the avvo community."

Christian K. Lassen II headshot
Christian Lassen

Unknown lawyer | Sep 05

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Top-notch attorney. Highly respected in the legal community."

Samuel A. Di Matteo Jr. headshot
Samuel Di Matteo

Criminal defense lawyer | Aug 06

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer.I find john to be a very adept Attorney who really is looking out for his client's best interests."

Michael S. Waddington headshot
Michael Waddington

Criminal defense lawyer | Jun 06

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse John. He is a highly skilled attorney that is well respected in the legal community."

Matisyahu Wolfberg headshot
Matisyahu Wolfberg

Criminal defense lawyer | Nov 21

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Andrew Joseph Edelberg headshot
Andrew Edelberg

General practice lawyer | Nov 01

Relationship: Other

"I endorse this lawyer."

Charles Anthony Rick headshot
Charles Rick

Criminal defense lawyer | Oct 29

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"John is an excellent criminal defense attorney who cares about his clients. He is an active member of the AVVO community and I would reccomend him to any client seeking criminal representation."

Andrew Wesley Cole headshot
Andrew Cole

Criminal defense lawyer | Aug 30

Relationship: Friend

"I met John while volunteering with Wills for Heroes (wills for first responders) and have met with him from time to time as he works in the criminal courts in Philadelphia. He is a diligent and artful practitioner of criminal defense and his substantial background in law enforcement helps him, and his clients, navigate the criminal justice system. I strongly recommend John."

View All Endorsements
Samuel A. Di Matteo Jr. headshot
Samuel Di Matteo

Criminal defense lawyer

Charles Anthony Rick headshot
Charles Rick

Family lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.3 (Excellent)

Honors

1984

Meritorious Service Award, Pinellas County Sheriff's Office

Work Experience

1997 - Present

Attorney, Criminal Defense Attorney

1995 - 2007

Assistant State Attorney, Office of the State Attorney, 5th Judicial Circuit of FL

1980 - 1995

Deputy Sheriff, Pinellas County Sheriff's Office

Associations

2010 - Present

Pennsylvania Bar

Member

1998 - Present

State Bar of Georgia

Member

1995 - Present

Florida Bar

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Attempt Murder

Not Guilty All Charges After Jury Trial

DUI

Dismissed after completing ARD

Robbery, Aggravated Assault

Dismissed at Premliminary Hearing

Possession with Intent to Deliver (PWID)

Dismissed at preliminary hearing

Burglary, Reciving Stolen Property

Dismissed Lack of Evidence

Sex Crime

Not Guilty after trial

See More Legal Cases

Education

1995

Thomas M. Cooley Law School

JD - Juris Doctor, Deans List

1990

St Leo University

BA - Bachelor of Arts Cum Laude

1978

PA National Guard Military Academy

Commissioned Second Lieutenant

Publications

2018

HG.org Global Legal Resources Search and Seizure

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution