Attorney Samuel John Saad III's Legal Cases

Foreclosure

Fifth Third Mortgage v. Lupo, 11-CA-2137

May 31, 2013

OUTCOME: Recovered all fees, costs, expenses and damages

Attorneys at the Law Office of Sam J. Saad III, PA were recently successful in assisting a third-party purchaser in a foreclosure case who was about to lose their entire investment when the Bank wanted ... to vacate the sale. In this case, Fifth Third Mortgage v. Lupo, 11-CA-2137, our client had already spent over $15,000 improving the property since their good faith purchase. Our attorneys were able to negotiate a deal which had the Bank reimburse our client for every expense put forward on the property, including attorney’s fees, and an extra $5,000. In the end, our client walked away with money in their pocket.

Foreclosure

The Bank of New York v. Jireh Enterprises, Case No. 08-CA-1599

Apr 30, 2013

OUTCOME: The Bank’s foreclsoure action was dismissed.

The Law Office of Sam J. Saad III, PA, appeared in Hernando County and achieved successful dismissal of the Bank’s foreclosure action in The Bank of New York v. Jireh Enterprises, Case No. 08-CA-1599. ... The Bank had filed its Complaint with the infamous David Stern’s office back in 2008 and failed to even produce a copy of the Note in question with their Complaint. The bank had then attempted to fix this illegal and egregious error by later filing the alleged Original Note and Mortgage in February of 2013. If the homeowner had failed to retain our office, this heinous violation of the homeowner’s rights would have gone unnoticed and the bank would have continued its illegal foreclosure practices. Today, however, our attorneys successfully argued to the Court that the Bank had no right to start the legal process of throwing someone out of their home when the Bank couldn’t even manage to produce a copy of the Note they were foreclosing on.

Landlord or tenant

Di Felice v. Davis, 12-SC-1211

Apr 30, 2013

OUTCOME: Total Victory, including fees and costs

The Law Office of Sam J. Saad III, PA, achieved a complete ruling in our clients’ favor in the landlord-tenant case of Di Felice v. Davis, 12-SC-1211. Our law office was retained by Defendants, the for ... mer tenants of a landlord who was attempting to hold Defendants responsible for thousands of dollars in bills for routine cleaning and furniture replacement, claiming that Defendants had destroyed the apartment prior to leaving. After our attorneys completed a thorough investigation of the case and depositions of Plaintiff’s key witnesses, our firm discovered that the pictures Plaintiff were using in support of their claim were not only blatantly false, but were illegally taken during the tenancy without Defendant’s permission. As such, our firm was successful in having the pictures removed from consideration. Without any photographic support in evidence of the alleged damages, Judge Carr in Collier County ruled entirely in our client’s favor, awarding nothing to the landlord, and has ordered the landlord to pay all attorney’s fees incurred to our client.

Samuel John Saad III's Legal Cases (3)

Fifth Third Mortgage v. Lupo, 11-CA-2137

The Bank of New York v. Jireh Enterprises, Case No. 08-CA-1599

Di Felice v. Davis, 12-SC-1211