Giraldo v. Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, 168 Cal. App. 4th 231
Nov 14, 2008OUTCOME: The Court held, as a matter of first impression, the prisons have a duty to protect inmates in their custody under state law.
This case presented a question never before decided in California: whether prisons had a duty to protect inmates in their custody under state law. Plaintiff was an inmate in the California prison syst ... em. Plaintiff was a transgender inmate who had the appearance of a woman, but was placed in the male inmate population where she was repeatedly raped and beaten. Plaintiff filed an action challenging prison policies that placed her in the male inmate population, without any meaningful precaution to the obvious risk of sexual assault. The complaint made the specific claim that defendants failed to take action on plaintiff's repeated complaints that she was being beaten and raped by her cellmate at Folsom State Prison. Before reaching a hung jury on plaintiff's intentional tort claims, the court dismissed plaintiff's negligence claims on grounds that no authority recognized a duty by prisons to protect inmates in their custody under negligence principles. The Court of Appeal reversed that dismissal in this landmark decision, which found for the first time that prisons have a duty to protect inmates under state law.
