Derek M. Wright

Derek M. Wright

3.5
Rating: 7.4

Licensed for 30 years

Criminal defense Lawyer at Fayetteville, GA
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense, Family, Personal Injury, General Practice

P.O.B. 143265, Fayetteville, GA

About Derek

Practice Areas

4

Practice Areas

Criminal Defense 70%

Federal, State, Murder, Armed Robbery, Drug Cases, DUI, Conspiracy, Probation Revocations, Family Violence, Appeals, Habeas, and Post Conviction Relief

31 years

70%
Family 10%

Divorce, Child Custody, and Child Support

31 years

10%
General Practice 10%

General counsel and transactional litigation

10%
Personal Injury 10%

Auto Collisions, Premises Liability

10%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Georgia for 30 years

State: Georgia

Acquired: 1995

Active Member in Good Standing

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2006

Location

Derek M Wright

P.O.B. 143265, Fayetteville, GA, 30214

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Derek M. Wright's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

3.5 /5.0

30 Client Reviews

Showing 6 - 10 of 10 reviews | Responsiveness

Posted by Frank | October 26, 2012 | Lawsuits & Disputes

Disillusioned

Paid Mr. Wright to represent my son. Had fast talk about how he could get the job done. It's been @ 3 years and coming up on the 4th delay of court date. Will not respond to phone calls or letters. Pathetic.

Derek Wright

Replied last February 18, 2013

In sum, strange enough I still represent this client. There have been several continuances. First, understand that this client is serving a life sentence for alleging raping a white girl in south Georgia. He is African-american. Why? Because the attorney they hired didn’t fight for him and, I believe, inappropriately convinced him to take a plea to a life sentence. The evidence doesn’t make sense and I sure as hell would never have recommended a plea. The appeals attorney did not put the trial attorney on the stand to prove up the ineffective assistance which made it impossible to win an appeal when the issue is to undue a plea. As such, the habeas petition I now represent this client on requires both the trial attorney and appeal attorney be subpoenaed and subjected to examination. One continuance was because the trial attorney is now a judge and had a conflict. One continuance was because the daughter of the appeals attorney was scheduled to compete at Olympic trials and requested a continuance. One continuance was because I was on jury trial. And I think that one continuance was requested by the state. I will fight for this young man because the plea was wrong. If his parents choose to call me pathetic, so be it. I will be whatever name they choose to call me, but at the end of day I will do all that I can to get their son out of a bad plea that should never have been agreed to by him or them. I am more concerned with their son’s case than whether they are disillusioned or calling me names. The day after the fight for their son is made, win or lose I expect they will amend this review as they see fit.

Posted by J | June 27, 2012 | Car Accidents

STAY AWAY,VERY UNSCRUPULOUS!

I contacted this attorney after my vehicle was damaged in the city of Atlanta, he spoke very eloquently and requested $500 to start the process of recovering the cost of my repairs. Immediately after I paid the $500, attorney Wright stopped answering my calls and emails. He had initially told me that... he expected to be able to settle my case in a few wks, however I never received a settlement and finally got an email from him 2 months later requesting additional monies.

Derek Wright

Replied last February 18, 2013

This client tried for several months to resolve his claim against the Darlington and/or the City of Atlanta. In sum, his car was damaged by a drain in the Darlington driveway. He tried to make claims against both the City of Atlanta and the Darlington and neither would accept responsibility for the drain. He hired me for just $500 to see if I could make headway since he was unable to obtain results. First, I filed an ante litem letter with Atlanta. Atlanta would have delayed him past the statute of limitations and without an ante litem he would have been out of luck. The Darlington sent me their insurance information. As such two things were accomplished he was unable to do. Yet, neither would enter into settlement negotiations. I advised a lawsuit was needed and indicated more fees would be necessary. Suddenly, I was terminated and a credit card payment reversed. And this client calls me names, really? I leave him to his own karma.

Posted by anonymous | November 22, 2011 | Lawsuits & Disputes

Not a good lawyer

I would not recommend this lawyer to someone who is very concerned about their case. He is not very good at informing his clients about the case and is usually not good about answering phone call. Although, he does leave messages when he calls back , he is vague and does not leave details. After my c...onsultation with him, he told us exactly what he was going to do and a time span but failed to comply with his word. During my case he took a 10 day vacation and after promising to work on our case during his vacation , he did not return any phone calls and we knew nothing about a hearing that was set on Monday (during his vacation) . He seems very optimistic in person but once gone, it is very hard to trust him .

Derek Wright

Replied last February 18, 2013

Not enough information to determine who this is. I do not take retainers then go on vacations when the client’s case is scheduled on the same day. For this reason, I have no recollection of this ever happening and I am unable to ascertain who this is. Might I inquire what happened with the case? Where and What result? Unfortunately, without knowing more I cannot either acknowledge fault and improve on my practice or demonstrate that the review is not based on objective opinion. I respectfully invite the reviewer to provide more information.

Posted by Dymond | June 02, 2010 | Criminal Defense

My life attorney

I met this attorney back in 2000 while sitting in the courtroom waiting for my case to be call. We had NEVER talked or seen each other before then. He was actually there to represent someone else. He asked me what was I there for aftering talking he said I'll take your case, both cases, only charg...ed me 1/8 what everyone else wanted to charge me for 1 case. He told me he would get them both dismissed. Yes, he was hard to reach at times, I wasn't his only client, Yes he was late for arraignment, but he got there and got the 1st case dismissed. The second case he informed me late in the evening we were going to trial the following morning. I am proud to say that case was also thrown out. He did exactly what he sai. It's called patience. Now he's handling my divorce and I'm not worried at all. No one is perfect. So he made a mistake. Ye without sin cast the first stone..

Posted by anonymous | October 16, 2009

I should have done my research

I hired this attorney in June 2009, I was very disappointed in the service. I could not get in touch with the attorney to get any updates on my case until September 2009 and it was via fax. He did not do anything that he said he would do during the consultation except make excuses for why he had no...t gotten to it. In fact, all he did was file the motion, something I could have did myself. I wish I would have searched his name and business first and I would have known his character and business practice. Please visit this website, which is public record. http://www.gabar.org/manage/Directory/DisciplineHistory.php?id=777740 and click on the review panel reprimand or visit http://www.gabar.org and read it. It appears that he has a history of not producing.

See All Client Reviews

Derek M. Wright's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Derek
Stephone B. Johnson headshot
Stephone Johnson

General practice lawyer | Nov 15

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. Derek has an unmatched and unparalleled work ethic. He is nothing short of an absolute perfectionist. He cares deeply about those he represents - he is more than just a zealous advocate for his clients, he is also a confidant and friend, and he ensures that his clients obtain only the absolute best result in their case. Derek is extremely knowledgeable and versed in his field of expertise, and is always up for a battle. Derek never accepts "no" for an answer, and he never backs down from a challenge, no matter how daunting the task."

Michael S. Waddington headshot
Michael Waddington

Criminal defense lawyer | Oct 14

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse Derek. He is a highly skilled attorney that is well respected in the legal community."

View All Endorsements
Felicia Nichole Johnson headshot
Felicia Johnson

Personal injury lawyer

Experience

Rating:  7.4 (Very Good)

Professional misconduct

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2006.

Review Panel Reprimand issued in GA, 2006

updated on 05/19/2010

This means the attorney did something wrong, but the Bar did not suspend the lawyer. Typically in this case, the lawyer's poor behavior is exposed to the public in hopes that he or she will not repeat the behavior.

Honors

2012

Distinguished, Martindale-Hubbell

Work Experience

2010 - Present

Managing Partner, Derek M. Wright, LLC

1996 - 2010

Managing Partner, The Wright Law Firm, P.C.

Associations

1994 - Present

HR Butler Lodge #23

1989 - Present

Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc

Education

1995

Georgia State University College of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1990

Princeton University

BSE- Civil Engineering & Systems Management

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline
    This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2006
    Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution