Scott Ewing Brient

Scott Ewing Brient

5.0
Rating: 8.8

Licensed for 26 years

Patent application Lawyer at Roswell, GA
Practice Areas: Patent Application, Intellectual Property, Patent Infringement ... +2 more

1175 Grimes Bridge Road, Suite 100, Roswell, GA

About Scott

Biography

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Georgia for 25 years

State: Georgia

Acquired: 2000

Active Member in Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in Florida for 26 years

State: Florida

Acquired: 1999

Inactive

No misconduct found

Location

Brient Globerman, LLC

1175 Grimes Bridge Road, Suite 100, Roswell, GA, 30075

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Scott Ewing Brient's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

1 Client Review

Filter Avvo Reviews (1) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 1
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 0
Practice Areas

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Responsiveness

Posted by Patrick | April 14, 2011 | Intellectual Property

Highly Recommended

I recently had the pleasure of working with Mr. Brient on my patent application. As a prolific inventor filing now 21 patent applications, I have developed working relationships with multiple Intellectual Property Attorneys over the last few years. Last summer I started my patent application with... a different attorney and fortunately terminated the relationship before any damage to my IP rights occurred. During my initial meeting with Scott I immediately recognized his genuine interest in my invention and attention to detail. All inventors having previous experience with filing patent applications recognize that an attorney’s interest and attention to detail is equally, if not more important, than technical aptitude and experience. Luckily, Scott also encompasses qualities of experience and know-how; he is truly a package deal. During the creation of my patent application, Scott asked detailed questions and adjusted his style to ensure I was comfortable with the approach. He remained flexible throughout the process and quickly made revisions upon my request. Although this is my first experience working with Scott, it felt as if we had been working together for years. Mr. Brient’s professionalism, ethical conduct, experience, attention to detail, and representation of my best interests will be the first thought on my mind when looking towards my next patent application. I am confident this is the beginning of a long standing professional working relationship. To all inventors seeking a reputable patent attorney, I recommend Mr. Scott Brient. Trust me that you will sleep better at night knowing the application filed at the USPTO will be of the highest quality.

See All Client Reviews

Scott Ewing Brient's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Scott

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Jacob Neal Harcrow headshot
Jacob Harcrow

Patent application lawyer

Alfred Steven Nugent IV headshot
Alfred Nugent

Patent application lawyer

Kyle Marc Globerman headshot
Kyle Globerman

Intellectual property lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.8 (Excellent)

Honors

2009

Georgia Rising Star, SuperLawyers

2009

Rising Star, Super Lawyers

Work Experience

2009 - 2023

Managing Attorney, Brient IP Law, LLC

2007 - 2009

Partner, Alston & Bird, LLP

2000 - 2006

Associate, Alston & Bird, LLP

1999 - 2000

Associate, Jones & Askew, LLP

Associations

2001 - Present

AIPLA

2009 - 2015

Atlanta Bar Association, Intellectual Property Section

Board of Directors

Education

1999

University of Florida

JD - Juris Doctor

1993

University of Florida

BS Mechanical Engineering; BA German

Speaking Engagements

2023

University of Florida Department of Anesthesia Spring Ski Summit

I Have An Invention, What Next?

2023

AIPLA Hot Topics Teleconference

Biogen International GmbH vs. Milan Pharmaceuticals Inc.

2017

SpringPosium

Patent Law Update

2016

SpringPosium

Roundtable Discussion of Patent Prosecution Issues

2015

SpringPosium

Patent Law Update

2013

SpringPosium Intellectual Property Event Patent Law Update

2012

Intellectual Property "SpringPosium" Event

The Patentability of Computer Systems, Software, and Business Methods

2009

Continuing Legal Education

Intellectual Property Ethics

Publications

2009

Insurance Company Mergers and Acquisitions, Aspatore Books Intellectual Property Considerations in Insurance-Related Mergers and Acquisitions

2006

Financial Engineering News A Simple Plan for Protecting New Ideas In the Financial Services Industry

Languages

English

German

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution