Paula Jeanette McGill

Paula McGill

A significant amount of what was posted is false. However, I try to explain the process as much as possible to clients and my policies. The Bars prevent attorneys from stating the specifics about their clients' cases and communications. As a result, attorneys are hamstrung when reviews like this are posted. However, below are the basics of my representation. Because 90% of my clients have never been through litigation, I have a blog that sets out the basics as much as possible. It lays out the policies of the Firm. mcgillaw.blogspot.com That blog link is also attached to my e-mails. Despite this information, this client, and apparently others, refused to read the postings. Also, when there are two clients (husband and wife), second hand information may not be relayed. That has happened before. Trying to ruin an attorney's reputation with a logically inconsistent review makes the client look bad. I didn't know that this was on the board because I still have received my normal volume of calls, emails and texts since it's been posted. I was updating my information when I saw it. So, obviously, many tenants, small landlords, and other potential clients have read this review and have chosen to ignore it. If you want a tenant attorney who has the experience to handle your matter, do the following: (1) go to my website - demandingjustice.com (2) talk to other attorneys; (3) ask attorneys outside of this specific practice area who they would want to represent them in a tenant action; (4) read my blog that highlights my policies and procedures; and (5) pick 3-4 firms to screen I am quite sure 9 times out of 10, I will be on your list of 3-4 to call. I give quality information and aggressively fight for my clients. I can send you public information of cases that worked out great for my clients. That is the type of information you look at when you look for an attorney, not a logically inconsistent review.