Omari Menka Wilson

Omari Menka Wilson

3.4
Rating: 6.4

Licensed for 18 years

Estate planning Lawyer at Durham, NC
Practice Areas: Estate Planning, Foreclosure, Real Estate, Business

811 Ninth St., Ste. 120-123, Durham, NC

About Omari

Biography

Practice Areas

4

Practice Areas

Real Estate 20%

Heirs property and real property issues (boundary disputes, access issues, etc.)

20%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Retainer

Sometimes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in North Carolina for 18 years

State: North Carolina

Acquired: 2007

Active

No misconduct found

Location

O. M. Wilson, PLLC

811 Ninth St., Ste. 120-123, Durham, NC, 27705

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Omari Menka Wilson's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

3.4 /5.0

5 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (5) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 5 of 5 reviews

Posted by anonymous | September 08, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Estate Planning

Not Recommended - Poor Communication and Service

My family and I experienced significant issues with Attorney Wilson's services that I feel compelled to share. After deciding to discontinue his estate planning services, while he did close our case as requested, he would not respond to any emails, texts, or calls regarding my mother's refund until S...eptember 5, 2025, causing unnecessary financial stress and frustration. Throughout this extended period, he was completely unresponsive to our attempts to communicate about the refund process and repeatedly demanded explanations for why my mother chose to hire different legal representation, which was inappropriate and made us uncomfortable. The lack of professionalism and basic courtesy we experienced was disappointing. When a client decides to end the attorney-client relationship, the process should be handled efficiently and respectfully, but unfortunately that was not our experience. Based on our family's experience, I cannot recommend Attorney Wilson's services. There are other legal professionals who will treat clients with the respect and promptness they deserve.

Omari Wilson

Replied last September 08, 2025

Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. We are sincerely sorry to hear that your experience did not meet your expectations, and we regret any frustration or inconvenience our communication delays may have caused you and your family. At our firm, we strive to provide the highest level of service and professionalism. We understand that a client's decision to discontinue services should be handled with respect and efficiency. Regarding your comment about our requests for an explanation, please know that our intent was never to be demanding or cause discomfort. Our standard practice is to seek client feedback upon disengagement so we can understand how to improve our services and address any issues. We regret that this was perceived in a negative light. While we cannot discuss the specifics of any client matter publicly due to attorney-client confidentiality, we are committed to resolving your concerns and ensuring your matter is fully closed. We have been in direct communication with you to address the outstanding issues, and we will continue to work diligently to bring this to a swift and satisfactory conclusion. We appreciate your feedback, as it helps us in our ongoing efforts to improve. We wish you and your family the best.

Posted by anonymous | September 12, 2022 | Hired Attorney | Foreclosure

Hired for a suplus of funds on a foreclosure

Hired him for a surplus of funds on a foreclosure. Charged me 1950.00 to only do the bare minimum. Agreements that were not met because he did to want to answer my questions to me about the case. His responses were ambiguous. He is unethical and does not follow up, you have to follow up.

Omari Wilson

Replied last September 13, 2022

You did engage me for the purpose of claiming an interest in surplus funds resulting from foreclosure sale. The fee was less than $1,950.00. There was an existing mortgage on the property with a loan balance, but I had no information regarding that balance. I explained to you numerous times that this information is important because it would let us know if the mortgage lender has any claim to the surplus funds. Despite my requests, you did not provide any information regarding the mortgage aside from your loan application. After explaining the importance of this missing loan balance information to you numerous times, you agreed to sign a written authorization allowing me to contact the lender to request information regarding the servicing of the loan. However, you refused to completely fill out the authorization form, leading to further delay in contacting the lender. After repeatedly explaining the importance of submitting a complete written authorization, you finally completed the form, and I was able to send your authorization and a request for loan documentation to the lender via certified mail on July 8. I sent you a copy of the authorization form and the request for information. I verified that the lender had received our request and your authorization on July 13, but I have yet to receive response from the lender containing the requested loan information, specifically your current loan balance. You requested that we ask that the Clerk of Court schedule a hearing on our petition and have the court sign an order granting release of the surplus funds to you. In response, I agreed that it has been a considerable amount of time since the lender received our request for loan documentation and your written authorization, and I stated that I would give the lender until September 30 to respond which is a reasonable period of time. If I did not receive a response by that date, I would prepare to file a request for a hearing on our petition if I determine that we are able to move forward without a response from the lender. I again explained to you that the information that we need, specifically the loan balance, is very important because it would let us know if the lender has any claim on the surplus funds. I told you that I was not willing to request a hearing without first trying to secure all the information necessary for us to be successful at the hearing. You responded by demanding that I schedule the hearing anyway, without the information that we need from the lender to verify whether the lender may have a claim on the surplus funds, and if so, what the amount of the lender’s claim would be. I explained that if we took the course of action that you demanded, the lender will have the opportunity to appear at the hearing to present evidence showing the current balance of the mortgage which may very well exceed the amount of surplus funds. If that were to happen, you would very likely receive absolutely nothing. I advised that it is better to be prepared with that information before the hearing instead of refusing to wait for the lender's response and charging forward only to be blindsided with evidence of a loan balance that exceeds the surplus funds amount and receive nothing at the hearing. You have refused to accept my legal advice, and you have been argumentative throughout the entirety of our engagement. I strive for utmost client satisfaction in every case, and my goal was to secure as much of the surplus funds for you as possible, but that was not possible here because you refused to listen to my legal assessment of your case. However, I wish you well as you move forward with this matter.

Posted by Calvin | August 31, 2022 | Hired Attorney

Investor

Professional, prompt, and detail oriented. I highly recommend Attorney Wilson.

Omari Wilson

Replied last September 13, 2022

It was my pleasure to work with you! Thank you for choosing me to assist you with your legal needs! I look forward to working with you again if you should ever require legal assistance in the future!

Posted by Tracy | February 22, 2022 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes

Probate/Etc

Mr Wilson was very attentive and concerned of our needs. Listened and question when not understood. Spoke in laymen terms. We are very satisfied with the outcome of our case. Looking forward to working with him again as we are sure to need him again. Thanks again Mr Wilson!!!

Omari Wilson

Replied last March 16, 2022

I'm very glad that I was able to help! Your satisfaction is my chief concern! I stand ready to assist if you need me again in the future. Thank you for choosing me to help you with your legal needs!

Posted by anonymous | February 21, 2022 | Hired Attorney | Environmental and Natural Resources

Taskforce co-leader

Assisting in environmental justice communities Taskforce mapping sessions with impacted communities and local government officials.

See All Client Reviews

Omari Menka Wilson's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Omari

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  6.4 (Good)

Work Experience

2020 - 2020

Staff Attorney, Hatcher Legal, PLLC

2008 - 2019

Staff Attorney, Land Loss Prevention Project

2006 - 2008

Paralegal, Land Loss Prevention Project

Associations

2016 - Present

Audubon North Carolina

Advisory Board

2016 - Present

North Carolina Climate Justice Collective

Leadership Team member

2008 - Present

North Carolina Bar Association

Member

2008 - Present

American Bar Association

Member

2007 - Present

North Carolina State Bar

Member

2007 - Present

Sixteenth Judicial District Bar Association

Member

2006 - Present

West End Revitalization Association

Management Team member

Education

2005

Capital University Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

2001

Appalachian State University

BS - Bachelor of Science, Psychology

Speaking Engagements

2019

Legal Services Task Force Trainings

Consumer Representation: Tips & Traps

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution