Julianne Booth Rothert

Julianne Booth Rothert

also known as Julianne Booth

4.4
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 23 years

Divorce and separation Lawyer at Cary, NC
Practice Areas: Divorce & Separation, Child Custody, Family

1001 Winstead Drive, Suite 110, Cary, NC

About Julianne

Biography

Practice Areas

3

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in North Carolina for 23 years

State: North Carolina

Acquired: 2002

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Triangle Smart Divorce

1001 Winstead Drive, Suite 110, Cary, NC, 27513

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Julianne Booth Rothert's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.4 /5.0

7 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (7) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | 1 star

Posted by anonymous | May 28, 2024 | Hired Attorney

Do not recommend

Triangle Smart Divorce is AWFUL! I had been working with them since January until a week ago. They didn’t do anything but take my money and create a whole mess and debacle. I am utterly disappointed and disgusted in the representation I received, and how I was treated whilst working with them. The co...mmunication I got from them was the absolute bare minimum, and insufficient. Everything with Julianne started off great, but once my ex finally retained counsel, she changed her tune. I lost trust and confidence in her after she would go days without answering my emails— and when she did, it would only be a 1 sentence reply until I also changed my tune with her. Julianne was always speaking her personal opinions about me, and my situation, which I do not appreciate at all. She became very opinionated and biased after there was opposing counsel. I paid thousands of dollars, only to have her betray me and not communicate with me. I wish I could get my money back. After retaining new counsel, things are already moving in a different direction. I can already see major differences after just a week or so of working with my new attorney. I would never recommend this firm to anyone unless you just have money to waste and do not value communication. I wish I could give them a negative amount of stars.

Julianne Rothert

Replied last June 17, 2024

While Bar Rules prohibit us from discussing anything with specificity regarding your case, we do appreciate you sharing your concerns with the CEO of our business (Mitzi Gardner). As she expressed in that call, we are truly sorry to hear about your experience and take your feedback very seriously. Our primary goal is to provide the highest level of service and support to our clients during what we understand can be an incredibly challenging time. We regret that you feel we fell short of your expectations. Client communication and satisfaction are of utmost importance to us, and we apologize if you felt these aspects were lacking. When we have updates to provide, we strive to share those promptly. We are not clear on what upset you by Julianne sharing her personal opinions with you about you and your situation, as straight-forward, transparent, and experience-based personalized opinions and advice are what we provide to clients. Many a law firm can promise you the moon and stars and set unrealistic expectations for you with regard to possible settlement options or court outcomes. We aren't one of those firms, and we will share our personal opinions with clients to help them decide on the next steps to take on the sometimes rough and bumpy road presented to them. We understand this advice isn't always well-received. We'd rather have our clients know the risks and exposure they face than be surprised or devastated by their results in Court. We wish you all the best moving forward. Please do reach out if we can assist in your transition to new counsel.

See All Client Reviews

Julianne Booth Rothert's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Julianne
Susan L. Goetcheus headshot
Susan Goetcheus

Family lawyer | Sep 08

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. She is a passionate and effective advocate for her clients. She is also a great mediator."

Kellie Chappell Gonzalez headshot
Kellie Gonzalez

Divorce and separation lawyer | Oct 15

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"Attorney Rothert and I were opposing counsel on a case. She was able to make progress on a case that prior attorneys had been at a deadlock. She is an asset to the profession."

Jeffrey E. Marshall headshot
Jeffrey Marshall

Divorce and separation lawyer | May 09

Relationship: Opposing Counsel on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. Julianne is an excellent attorney with a superb reputation among her peers, including the judges, in Wake County. She is known for producing top quality work and fighting to obtain the best possible outcome for her clients. She is a skilled litigator who cares deeply for her clients and their best interests. Julianne is also an excellent negotiator and often is able to obtain excellent results for her clients without the need for going to court."

Michael S. Waddington headshot
Michael Waddington

Family lawyer | Oct 15

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse Julianne. She is a highly skilled attorney that is well respected in the legal community."

View All Endorsements
Jeffrey E. Marshall headshot
Jeffrey Marshall

Family lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2026

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2025

Super Lawyer, North Carolina Super Lawyers

2025

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2024

Super Lawyer, North Carolina Super Lawyers

2024

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2021

Best Lawyer, Best Lawyers in America

2020

Best Lawyers, Best Lawyers in America

2019

Best Lawyers, Best Lawyers in America

2017

Best Lawyers, Best Lawyers in America

2017

Legal Elite, Business North Carolina

2016

Legal Elite, Business North Carolina

2016

Best Lawyers in America, Best Lawyers

2014

Legal Elite, Business North Carolina

Work Experience

2020 - Present

Attorney, Triangle Smart Divorce

2005 - 2020

Attorney, Wake Family Law Group

2002 - 2005

Attorney, Howard, Stallings, From & Hutson, PA

Associations

2011 - Present

North Carolina Dispute Resolution Commission

Family Financial Mediator

2008 - Present

North Carolina State Board of Legal Specialization

Family Law Specialist

2002 - Present

North Carolina State Bar

Member

2002 - Present

North Carolina Bar Association

Member

2002 - Present

Wake County Bar Association

Member

2002 - Present

Wake County Bar Association, Tenth Judicial District

Member

2002 - Present

North Carolina Bar Association, Family Law Section

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Stein v Brasington

Affirmed in part; vacated in part; remanded in part.

Elkordy v Farag

Petition for Stay and Temporary Ex Parte Stay of Orders and for Write of Supersedeas denied.

Perez v Perez

Appeal Withdrawn.

Mungo v Mungo

Vacated in part, affirmed in part, and remanded.

See More Legal Cases

Education

2002

Campbell University, Norman Adrian Wiggins School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1997

Clemson University

BS - Bachelor of Science

Speaking Engagements

2004

Annual Family Law Specialist Meeting

Unconstitutionality of Levying Bank Accounts for Child Support with Notice

Publications

2001

Campbell Law Review Campbell Law Review Editor-In-Chief

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution