Alexandria, VA
Government Lawyer at Alexandria, VA
Practice Areas: Government
OUTCOME: Approved sentence reduced
Convinced Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals to order the convening authority to approve only 60 days of confinement rather than the 75 days which had been adjudged by the court-martial.
OUTCOME: Charges dismissed
The trial judge dismissed the charges against the client due to the government's loss of key defense evidence. The government appealed the judge's dismissal of the case. The Air Force Court of Crimin ... al Appeals upheld the judge, and the government appealed that court's decision as well. Convinced the Court of Appeals of the Armed Forces to uphold the military judge's decision to dismiss the case.
OUTCOME: Charges dismissed
Case was dismissed by the trial judge due to the government's destruction of key evidence needed by the defense. The government appealed the dismissal. Convinced the Air Force Court of Criminal Appea ... ls to uphold the military judge's decision.
OUTCOME: Appeal granted, conviction overturned; acquitted on retrial
Convinced Court of Appeals of the Armed Forces to set aside conviction due to improperly admitted evidence. On retrial, without the improper evidence, client was fully acquitted.
OUTCOME: Sentence reassessed
Convinced Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals to reassess client's sentence after reversing convictions for obstructing justice and communicating a threat.
OUTCOME: I recommended the case be tried at a General Court-Martial, but that not all of the allegations be taken forward. My recommendation was followed.
I served as the Article 32 Investigating Officer (probable cause officer/magistrate). I held an evidentiary hearing and then issued a written recommendation as to whether enough evidence existed to ch ... arge the case at a court-martial.
OUTCOME: I recommended the case be tried at a general Court-Martial; my recommendation was followed.
I served as the Article 32 Investigating Officer (probable cause officer/magistrate). I held an evidentiary hearing and then issued a written report regarding whether sufficient evidence existed to tr ... y the case at court-martial.
OUTCOME: I recommended the case be tried at a General Court-Martial; my recommendation was followed.
I served as the Article 32 Investigating Officer (probable cause officer/magistrate). I held an evidentiary hearing and issued a written report regarding whether sufficient evidence existed to charge ... the case at court-martial.
OUTCOME: I recommended that there was sufficient evidence to charge the case, but that winning at trial would be unlikely.
I served as the Article 32 Investigating Officer (probable cause officer/magistrate). I presided at an evidentiary hearing and then issued a written report regarding whether there was sufficient eviden ... ce to proceed to trial by court-martial.
OUTCOME: Acquitted
I prosecuted the case against an Airman accused of cocaine use by other Airman who were facing court-martial.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
