Oti Winifred Uku Nwosu

I wanna start off the story by saying these people are nothing but narcissistic love bombing people. Let me explain the very first meeting we had we met with lawyer Oti and her assistant Ms.Arlene we were told those were the people going to be working on our case from there everything went down hill.... They had random people who knew nothing about us or our case working on it. Being rude and unprofessional on phone calls and in person and even opening up my own mail which is a federal crime by the way. I wouldn’t recommend them to family friends or not even my worse enemy they’ll try to reel you in with the first meeting by being super attentive and nice but don’t let them. They need they’re license taken from them.

I hoped that I can help my client to work with this lawyer. however, respectfully I contacted Mrs. Oti Winifred Uku Nwosu regarding a straightforward easy immigration matter involving the Affidavit of Support. Despite multiple attempts to clarify the client’s urgent legal needs, I found her unrespon...sive, inattentive, and unfamiliar with the enforcement requirements mandated by USCIS. She showed no interest in hearing legal specifics and quickly dismissed relevant USCIS law I referenced, disregarding both the information provided and the applicable immigration law readily available on the USCIS website. When asked if she had handled similar cases before, she claimed she had; however, I question how she managed such cases while seemingly unaware of the Affidavit of Support’s 10-year duration. She was quick to dismiss this legal requirement without any legal basis to support her opinion. Incorrectly, she insisted that the Affidavit of Support obligation lasts only 5 years, contrary to the 10-year period outlined by USCIS. This fundamental misinformation, combined with her sarcastic and judgmental attitude, raised concerns, as it could easily dissuade a client from pursuing their legal rights based on her incorrect opinion when, in fact, federal law does allow them to proceed. More troubling was her dismissive comment advising the disabled, 85-year-old client to “find a job” rather than pursue his legal right to support from his sponsor, showing a lack of understanding of both the Affidavit’s obligations and the realities of age and disability. Based on this experience, I would not recommend her for immigration-related cases, as she seemed quick to draw incorrect conclusions without supporting legal knowledge, or consideration for the client’s legal needs