Danny M Howell

PRO

Danny M Howell

also known as Danny Mark Howell

5.0
3 reviews
This is an aggregated review score of Avvo and Lawyers.com reviews.
Rating: 8.1

Licensed for 36 years

Lawsuits and disputes Lawyer at Mc Lean, VA
Practice Areas: Lawsuits & Disputes, Administrative Law, Business ... +15 more

1497 Chain Bridge Road, Suite 202, Mc Lean, VA

About Danny

Biography

Practice Areas

18

Practice Areas

Other 15%

15%
Administrative Law 5%

5%
Appeals 5%

5%
Business 5%

5%
Car Accident 5%

5%
Constitutional 5%

5%
Construction and Development 5%

5%
Consumer Protection 5%

5%
Corporate and Incorporation 5%

5%
Education 5%

5%
Ethics and Professional Responsibility 5%

5%
General Practice 5%

5%
Insurance 5%

5%
Lawsuits and Disputes 5%

5%
Life Insurance 5%

5%
Litigation 5%

5%
Medical Malpractice 5%

5%
Personal Injury 5%

5%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 275-375 per hour


Payment Methods

  • Check
  • Credit Card

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating

Licenses

Licensed in Maryland for 27 years

State: Maryland

Acquired: 1997

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in District of Columbia for 35 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 1990

Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in Virginia for 36 years

State: Virginia

Acquired: 1989

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Danny M Howell

1497 Chain Bridge Road, Suite 202, Mc Lean, VA, 22101-5702

sandsanderson.com/attorneys/danny-howell.html

Law Offices of Danny M. Howell, PLLC

6861 Elm St., Ste. 3D, McLean, VA, 22101

sandsanderson.com/attorneys/danny-howell.html

Online Presence

Other places you can find Danny online.

Danny M Howell's Reviews

5 star

(1)

4 star

(0)

3 star

(0)

2 star

(0)

1 star

(0)

Posted by Michele | May 18, 2018 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Competent attorney

I was referred to Danny by another attorney. He is competent and empathic and was able to guide me into having a life insurance claim denial reversed.

See All Client Reviews

Danny M Howell's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Danny

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  8.1 (Excellent)

Honors

2009

Approved Instructor., Virginia Insurance Continuing Education Board

2007

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2007

Fellow, National Institute for Teaching Ethics and Professionalism

N/A

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

Work Experience

2003 - Present

Attorney/Shareholder, Sands Anderson, PC

1900 - Present

Principal, Law Offices of Danny M. Howell, PLLC

2006 - 2006

Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Richmond

1997 - 2003

Attorney/Partner, Schraub & Howell Co., Chtd.

1993 - 1997

Attorney, Robins Kaplan Miller & Cirisi

1991 - 1993

Attorney, Melrod Redman & Gartlan PC

1990 - 1991

Attorney, Sachs &Taylor PC

1989 - 1990

Attorney, Golden Freda & Schraub

Associations

2014 - Present

Professional Liability Defense Federation

Sample of Legal Cases

Escobar v. Lilly Law Group, 2014 Va. LEXIS 71 (April 17, 2014)

reversed and remanded

Smith v. Purnell, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141738 (E.D. Va. Dec. 9, 2011), aff'd, 474 Fed. Appx. 464 (4th Cir. Aug. 20, 2012)

dismissal affirmed

Minnesota Lawyers Mut. Ins. Co. v. Antonelli, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 6504 (Mar. 29, 2012)

affirming summary judgment

Builders Mut. Ins. Co. v. Futura Group, L.L.C., 779 F. Supp. 2d 529 (E.D. Va. 2011)

motion to stay denied

Builders Mut. Ins. Co. v. Parallel Design & Dev. LLC, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142870 (E.D. Va. Oct. 5, 2010)

motion for protective order granted

Minnesota Lawyers Mut. Ins. Co. v. Antonelli, 355 Fed. Appx. 698 (4th Cir. Dec. 9, 2009)

summary judgment granted on remand

Laios v. Wasylik, 564 F. Supp. 2d 538 (E.D.Va. 2008)

motion to dismiss granted

Lehman Bros. Bank, FSB v. Frank T. Yoder Mortg., 415 F. Supp. 2d 636 (E.D.Va. 2006)

motion to dismiss granted

Great American Ins. Co. v. Gross, 468 F.3d 199 (4th Cir. 2006)

reversed and remanded

Shipman v. Kruck, 593 S.E.2d 319 (Va. 2004)

affirmed

Amond v. Brincefield, Hartnett & Associates, P.C., 175 F.3d 1015 (Table), 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 4815 (4th Cir. Mar. 22, 1999)

affirmed

District of Columbia v. United Jewish Appeal Fed., 672 A.2d 1075 (D.C. 1996)

affirmed

See More Legal Cases

Education

1989

George Mason University School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1978

Indiana University

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2015

panel presentation, mid-year meeting

The Tripartite Relationship: Issues and Answers

2015

national telephonic cle

Ethics for Corporate Litigators

2014

national telephonic cle

Professionalism: Attorney's Obligations to the client, the court and other parties

2014

Lecture, Fall Conference

Protecting Yourself From Your Insurance Company

2013

NBI CLE Course

Applying the Rules of Evidence: What Every Attorney Needs to Know

2013

national teleconference CLE course

Attorney Professionalism: From Aspirational Ideas to Practice

Publications

2015

Professional Liability Defense Quarterly "Defending Lawsuits Arising Out Of Accreditation Decisions"

2010

The View (Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company) Reporting Potential Claims To Your Legal Malpractice Carrier

2010

Virginia Bar Association News Journal Ethical Responsibilities When Attorneys Learn They Have Committed Professional Errors While The Representation Is Ongoing

2005

Atlantic Coast In-House Getting The Right Malpractice Insurance

2004

Washington Lawyer Surviving Allegations of Professional Misconduct

2003

Coverage (ABA) Defense Counsel and Coverage Implications of the Tripartite Relationship

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution