Stephan Young Brennan

The Supreme Court of Maryland (formerly Court of Appeals of Maryland) admitted the applicant.

The Supreme Court of Maryland (formerly Court of Appeals of Maryland) reversed the trial court and lower appellate court, holding there was sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict that hospital was liable under theory of apparent agency.

Case was dismissed in U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

Case was dismissed by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland

The Court of Appeals of Maryland approved Mr. Nemirovsky's application and ordered him admitted to the Maryland Bar.

All of the defendants moved to dismiss based upon, inter alia, the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, and the U.S. District Court granted the Defendants' motions to dismiss.

The lawsuit was dismissed, and the dismissal was affirmed by the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

The District Court held that the insurance policy was ambiguous, but found hat extrinsic evidence clarified the ambiguity and demonstrated that the policy did not provide coverage.

The District Court granted Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment as to the duty to defend, holding that the policy exclusions did not negate the insurance carrier's duty to defend their insureds in the underlying lawsuit.

On remand from the Fourth Circuit, the District Court granted summary judgment in favor of Mr. Brennan's clients, the insureds, on the issue of whether the insurance carrier had a duty to defend the underlying claim

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed the District Court.

The Court of Special Appeals affirmed the trial court.

The court granted the motion to dismiss all statutory and tort claims against client, a real estate settlement company, and dismissed all substantive claims against client in counts seeking reformation or rescission of documents

The court entered summary judgment against the plaintiff on plaintiff's remaining claim under Maryland Franchise Act with regard to plaintiff's claim that defendants violated the Act through representations about earnings of the potential franchise

The court granted a motion for summary judgment as to all claims except for one plaintiff's claim under the Maryland Franchise Act; the court granted summary judgment on all claims against two plaintiffs; and the court struck demand for jury trial

Case remanded to state court, subsequently removed to U.S. District Court a second time based upon alleged fraudulent joinder

Memorandum from judge explaining that claim against pharmacist was barred under Maryland law, but perhaps not under federal law, which created an Erie issue

The court denied the plaintiff's motion

The Court denied Plaintiff's second motion for new trial based on information allegedly discovered after first motion was denied and during appeal

The judge ruled in plaintiff's favor that the pleadings in the underlying lawsuit sought covered damages under the policy but ruled in insurance company's favor that all allegations fell within two policy exclusions. The case is on appeal.

The court held the denial of the attorney's motion to withdraw was appealable under the collateral order doctrine but dismissed appeal as it was not filed within 30 days of order

The judge denied the plaintiff's initial motion to remand to state court

U.S. District Judge dismissed lawsuit against Mr. Brennan's client

The trial court was affirmed

Defendants' Motion tor Summary Judgment Granted

The trial court was affirmed

Denial of Plantiff's Motion to Compel Documents

Non-Party Witness' Motion to Quash Denied

Defendant's Partial Summary Judgment Granted

Client Prevailed on Issue of Improper Venue

The trial court was affirmed

The trial court was affirmed

Reversal of Court of Special Appeals

The trial court was affirmed

Court of Appeals partially reversed

Court of Special Appeals and Trial Court Affirmed

The defendant prevailed

Partial reversal of administrative agency ruling

Clients prevailed on debtors' claims against them

The defendants prevailed

Cross-Appeal was successfully reinstated

Motions Ruling- Denial of other Defendants' Motion

Motions Ruling- Denial of Motion to Dismiss

Judge Granted Motion to Dismiss

The Court of Appeals granted the Defendants' motions for summary affirmance

Plaintiff won partial summary judgment

Summary judgment in favor of client.

The plaintiff's claims against the defendants were dismissed with prejudice and the Court of Special Appeals affirmed.

The appeal against Mr. Brennan's client was dismissed.

Magistrate Judge recommended dismissal of claims against certain defendants

All defendants ultimately prevailed after trial

Magistrate Judge recommended dismissal of claims against certain defendants

The defendants prevailed after trial

The Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of the claims against the Defendants

The defendants prevailed after trial

Magistrate Judge recommended dismissal of claim against Mr. Brennan's client

U.S. District Judge dismissed claim against Mr. Brennan's clients with prejudice

The Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's dismissal with prejudice of the claims against Mr. Brennan's clients

The judge granted Defendants' motions to strike amended complaint and surreply, denied Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend, and denied Defendants' motion to dismiss or in the alternative to transfer