Manassas, VA
Sex crime Lawyer at Manassas, VA
Practice Areas: Sex Crime, Juvenile ... +3 more
OUTCOME: Charge amended to Trespass, case continued one year to be Dismissed conditoned upon good behavior for 12 months.
Client charged with Assault on a Police Officer, a Felony charge carrying a mandatory minimum sentence of 6 months in jail.
OUTCOME: Amended to trespass, continued to be dismissed.
Client charged with shoplifting from Walmart. Charge amended to trespass and continued to be dismissed conditioned on client completing community service within 6 months.
OUTCOME: Nolle Prossed
Client charged with Violation of Protective Order
OUTCOME: Felony dismissed. Guilty of misdemeanor marijuana possession.
Client charged with Misdemeanor Possession of Marijuana and Felony Possession of a Schedule II Drug.
OUTCOME: Nolle Prossed.
Client charged with Petit Larceny. Commonwealth offered a Plea Agreement, Client declined offer on my advice that we had a significant chance of challenging the Commonwealth's evidence at trial and re ... ceiving a Not Guilty Verdict.
OUTCOME: Not Guilty
Client charged with Disorderly Conduct in a restaurant, incident caught on Police Body-Worn Camera. Client plead not guilty and had a bench trial in General District Court.
OUTCOME: Charge reduced to Petit Larceny and continued 90 days to be Dismissed if 25 hours Community Service completed.
Client charged with Grand Larceny for shoplifting from Macy's.
OUTCOME: Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals, 2 Justices dissented, agreeing with the Court of Appeals and my argument.
Briefed and presented Oral Argument to the Supreme Court of Virginia after successfully arguing for and receiving a Reversal and Remand at the Court of Appeals. Commonwealth appealed to the Supreme Co ... urt.
OUTCOME: Reversed and Remanded
Brief and presented Oral Argument to the Court of Appeals of Virginia of Sanchez's conviction for failing to stop after an accident, felony hit and run. Argued that defendant stated a particularized n ... eed for additional funds for a DNA expert, and that it was error for the trial court to deprive him of those funds, and that the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction, and that the probative value of evidence of a carjacking was substantially outweighed by the danger of undue prejudice.
OUTCOME: Not Guilty
Juvenile client, found guilty in Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court, appealed to Circuit Court. Jury found client Not Guilty.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
