We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: District of Columbia
Acquired: 1999
Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2007
1707 N Street Northwest, Washington, DC, 20036
1707 N St NW, Washington, DC, 20036-2829
3 Client Reviews
Showing 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
Posted by Adalbert | October 09, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Immigration
ADDRESSING THE PREVIOUS REVIEW
Dodds & Associates has been in business for over 25 years. Since its formation in 1999 our office has helped thousands of clients with their immigration matters. Although we have clients from all over the world the majority of our clients are members of the Latino Community. It is noteworthy that our...
Posted by anonymous | September 06, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Immigration
Avoid Dodds & Associates – A Costly Mistake That Put My Family at Risk
I’m writing this review to warn others: do not trust Dodds & Associates with your immigration case. Their negligence and lack of transparency have caused serious harm to my family’s legal status in the U.S. I came to them with a job offer and asked for guidance on applying for a work visa without...
RESPONSE We have been in business for over 25 years. We don’t advertise, we don’t request people to post positive reviews (even when we have a very high approval rate) and we don’t normally respond to bad reviews like the one above. However, the review carries so many lies and inconsistencies that we have decided to convey our side of the story on this and other clients who choose to blame the attorney when the attorney had done nothing wrong. We can fully understand the enormous frustration people go through when they get a denial notice from the USCIS. We dislike the notices as well; they are not good for our business, not good for our reputation as an office but most importantly because they are incredibly disruptive. Any time our office receives a denial notice our team knows we all need to move extremely fast since the service only gives us 30 days to file a Motion to Reopen & Reconsider; to make matters worse by the time we have the opportunity to sit down with the client to discuss the next possible steps more time has elapsed and the filing of the Motion and a potential secondary application will by then have the character of urgent. We deal with the urgent matters with the corresponding urgency. That is in part what clients pay us for. If we get back to a client and tell him/her we need to file a Motion to Reopen & Reconsider in less than 30 days and also offer the option of a secondary application as a “plan B” of sort we are doing so in the best interest of the client. The reviewer seems to think we were eager to get money and that we were offering an EB2 just to get the extra revenue, when nothing could be further from the true. The service requires the payment of government fees, not us. The service requires EAD cards be renewed every so often, not us. The service issues denials for applications, not us. The service requires all documents be translated to English, not us. Sadly our office like any other law office requires to be paid for the work it performs. The client clearly resented that; but in that regard we do not operate any differently to any law office anywhere else in the world. Lastly the reviewer complains that our staff was contacting him to request payment and not answer his/her questions. Any person who has worked with an attorney before knows that if a client has a legal question, the legal question needs to be answered by their lawyer or paralegal in charge. If a staff member calls a client to remind the person of a balance due and the person asks him/her a question and the staff member tells the person to contact the attorney; that does not constitute refusing to answer a question. It is telling the person who to direct the question to. And it is done with the benefit of the client at heart. I would not like the receptionist in my doctor’s office answering my medical questions; even when she is the one contacting me to remind me of my due bills.
Posted by Kap | March 31, 2015 | Immigration
I got rejected because of this lawyer
I would have giving no star but you cannot do in Yelp. We got reject because with our greencard interview because of this lawyer. I was thinking this is a good lawyer because it was close to double cost. Other lawyers are coming to the interview but this lawyer asked $3000 extra to come, my friend...
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2007.
Informal Admonition issued in DC, 2007
updated on 05/24/2012An admonition means an attorney did something wrong but may still practice law. The Bar gives the lawyer an admonition in hopes that he or she will not repeat the behavior.
Member