Attorney Daniel P Meyer's Legal Cases

Employment and labor

Angela M. Cassady v. Department of Justice, MSPB DA-0752-19-0377-I-1

Jan 17, 2020

OUTCOME: Termination reduced to a letter of reprimand

The appellant was employed as a Chemist, GS-1320-13, with the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Operational Support Division, Office of Science and Technology, South Central Laboratory Group 1, in ... Dallas, Texas. Appellant was found to have committed violations leading to three charges and a penalty for removal. The Board mitigated the agency's removal, returned the client to work with a letter of reprimand. The agency did not appeal.

Employment and labor

Of Record, Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals, ISCR Case No. 18-01175

Nov 28, 2018

OUTCOME: https://www.tullylegal.com/wp-content/uploads/Dan_meyer_security_clearance.pdf

Eligibility for access to classified information granted. Federal Defense contractor facing a denial of eligibility for access to classified information due to Guideline E (Personal Conduct), H (Drug ... Involvement) & J (Criminal Conduct) triggers.

Administrative law

Of Counsel, Donald Van Winkle v. Blue Grass Chemical Activity

Jan 01, 2011

OUTCOME: Returned for rehearing.

2011 DOL Ad. Rev. Bd. LEXIS 13 (A.R.B. 2011)(SWDA reprisal complaint under in which the ALJ initially determined no jurisdiction under the rule in Egan; A.R.B. reversed and remanded for rehearing);

Administrative law

Investigator, James A. Helms v. Dep’t of the Army

Jan 01, 2011

OUTCOME: Investigation in Helms I found for Mr. Helms, on the subject of whistleblower reprisal.

2011 MSPB LEXIS 4955 (MSPB 2011)(settlement agreement leaving a complainant with less than being made whole after substantiated reprisal);

Administrative law

Investigator, David A. Tenenbaum v. U.S. Dept’ of Defense

Jan 01, 2010

OUTCOME: Investigation found discrimination against Mr. Tenenbaum.

407 Fed. Appx. 4 (6th Cir. 2010)(case of substantiated religious discrimination in which the remedy was inadequate due to the state secrets doctrine);

Administrative law

Investigator, Pedeleose v. Dep’t of Defense

Jan 01, 2009

OUTCOME: Investigation closed at my request due to conflict of interest on advising attorney's part.

343 Fed. Appx. 605 (Fed. Cir. 2009)(OIG-INV-CRI completed its investigation when it was informed that the Office of the General Counsel for the Inspector General was coordinating a 30-day letter of sus ... pension for the Complainant. Working with the Principal Deputy, I closed out case without issuing the Report of Investigation and recommended the complainant take his allegation to the Merit System Protection Board.); see also Pedeleose v. Dep’t of Defense, 2009 M.S.P.B. 16 (Feb. 12, 2009);

Administrative law

Of Counsel, Chambers v. Dep’t of Interior, 515 F.3d 1362

Jan 01, 2008

OUTCOME: Returned for rehearing.

(Fed. Cir. 2008)(served as counsel for the team representing Chief Chambers at the beginning of her appeal; left representative capacity in 2004. In the final decisions, the court vacated the MSPB's d ... ecision finding that the DOI did not violate the employee's rights under the WPA, affirmed all other aspects of the MSPB's decision, and remanded the case to the MSPB for further proceedings.); see also Chambers v. Dep’t of Interior, 2009 M.S.P.B. 3 (2009); Chambers v. Dep’t of Interior, 2004 MSPB LEXIS2430.

Administrative law

Investigator, Zgonc v. Dep’t of Defense

Jan 01, 2006

OUTCOME: Defered to OSC.

304 F.3d 31 (Fed. Cir. 2006)(both the Inspector General and the Office of Special Counsel opened investigations into this matter. When the complainant decided to file with the Washington D.C. Regional ... Office, both OSC and CRI held their investigations in abeyance pending the decision of the Board. CRI had already completed its final Report of Investigation.); see also Zgonc v. Dep’t of Defense, 2006 M.S.P.B. 315 (Oct. 20, 2006).

Administrative law

Of Counsel, Knox v. Dep’t of Labor, 434 F.3d 721 (4th Cir. 2006)

Jan 01, 2006

OUTCOME: Remanded.

Employee's petition for review was granted. The case was remanded to the ARB. Counsel at time of final decision was my successor at PEER, Mr. Richard Condit); see also Knox v. Norton, 2002 EEOPUB LEXI ... S 1602; Knox v. Dep’t. of Interior, 2005 DOL Ad. Rev. Bd. LEXIS 112 (Oct. 24, 2005); Knox v. Dept. of Interior, 2006 DOL Ad. Rev. Bd. LEXIS 8 (Apr. 28, 2006); Knox v. Dept. of Interior, 2007 DOL Ad Rev. Bd. LEXIS 74 (Aug. 30, 2007);

Administrative law

Of Counsel, Eller v. Dep’t of Interior, 2005 MSPB LEXIS 3928

Jan 01, 2005

OUTCOME: Decision against.

(completed the initial legal analysis of the Eller case, which was developed by the Executive Director of PEER.); see also Keefer v. Department of Agriculture, 92 M.S.P.R. 476 (2002)(served as co-couns ... el).

Daniel P Meyer's Legal Cases (13)

Angela M. Cassady v. Department of Justice, MSPB DA-0752-19-0377-I-1

Of Record, Defense Office of Hearings and Appeals, ISCR Case No. 18-01175

Of Counsel, Donald Van Winkle v. Blue Grass Chemical Activity

Investigator, James A. Helms v. Dep’t of the Army

Investigator, David A. Tenenbaum v. U.S. Dept’ of Defense

Investigator, Pedeleose v. Dep’t of Defense

Of Counsel, Chambers v. Dep’t of Interior, 515 F.3d 1362

Investigator, Zgonc v. Dep’t of Defense

Of Counsel, Knox v. Dep’t of Labor, 434 F.3d 721 (4th Cir. 2006)

Of Counsel, Eller v. Dep’t of Interior, 2005 MSPB LEXIS 3928