Find a Lawyer Dist. of Columbia Washington Appeals
Gregory A. Castanias

Gregory A. Castanias

also known as Greg Castanias

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 9.2

Licensed for 35 years

Appeals Lawyer at Washington, DC
Practice Areas: Appeals, Intellectual Property, Litigation ... +2 more

51 Louisiana Avenue, Northwest, Washington, DC

Send Message
Overview Reviews Experience
Overview Reviews Experience

Send Message

About Gregory

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Appeals 50%

50%
Intellectual Property 25%

25%
Litigation 15%

15%
Government 5%

5%
Tax 5%

5%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer

Contact for Details

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in District of Columbia for 32 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 1994

Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in Virginia for 32 years

State: Virginia

Acquired: 1993

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Indiana for 35 years

State: Indiana

Acquired: 1990

Active in Good Standing

No misconduct found

Location

Jones Day

51 Louisiana Avenue, Northwest, Washington, DC, 20001-2105

Message Get Directions

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Gregory A. Castanias's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Gregory A. Castanias's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Gregory

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  9.2 (Superb)

Honors

2015

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2015

Best Lawyer, Appellate Practice, Best Lawyers in America

2015

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2014

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2014

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2013

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2012

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2012

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2011

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2011

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2010

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2010

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2009

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2009

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2008

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2007

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2006

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2005

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2004

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2003

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2002

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2001

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2000

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

Associations

Federal Circuit Bar Association

Member

International Trade Commission Trial Lawyers Association

Member

American Bar Association

Member

American Inns of Court - Edward Coke Appellate Chapter

Master

1997 - 2003

International Trade Commission Trial Lawyers Association - Executive Committee

Member

Education

1990

Indiana University School of Law, Bloomington

JD - Juris Doctor

1987

Wabash College

A.B.

Speaking Engagements

2007

ALI-ABA Teleseminar

Supreme Court’s Opinion in KSR Changes Patent Landscape

2007

Unknown

The Supreme Court and Patent Law, and What It Means for IP Appellate Advocacy

2007

Catholic University

Ethical Issues in Patent Law

2007

Unknown

Preserving Errors for Appeal in IP Cases

2007

A Presentation for Officials of the Chinese Ministry of Commerce

Emerging Issues in International Trade and International Law and Litigation

2007

Unknown

The MedImmune decision and the KSR argument: The Supreme Court Continues its Dialogue With the Federal Circuit

2006

Unknown

KSR v. Teleflex -- The Law of Obviousness: Is a Change Coming from the U.S. Supreme Court?

2006

National Association of Attorneys General, Civil Rights Conference

The Implications of United States v. Georgia for States

2006

ALI-ABA Telephone Seminar, IP Law Series

The Implications of the U.S. Supreme Court's Ruling in the Patent Infringement case eBay Inc. v MercExchange LLC

Publications

2003

Patent World Preserving Errors for Appeal in the U.S.

1998

Litigation Tangled Web: Personal Jurisdiction and the Internet

1998

3 State & Local Tax Lawyer 119 The Supreme Court and State Taxation: 1996-97, and a Glimpse of the Future to Come

1996

Practical Litigator, Vol. 7, No. 6, p. 27 Certiorari in Business Cases: Improving Your Chances

1993

National Law Journal Daubert Doesn’t End Debate on Experts

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution
Learn More About the Avvo Rating