Rainey v. CHS
Aug 15, 2014OUTCOME: Court ordered employer to pay
Employer and insurer denied over $750,000 in life insurance for murdered pharmacist's children, claiming she was ineligible for amount signed up for at work.
Jeremy Lyle Bordelon's Legal Cases (9)
Portland, OR
Employee benefits Lawyer at Portland, OR
Practice Areas: Employee Benefits, Insurance
Keegan v. MetLife
Mar 31, 2014OUTCOME: Benefits awarded
MetLife denied LTD benefits to cancer patient with chemo-related cognitive problems. Court overturned denial, ordered MetLife to pay benefits.
Cotterman-Henson v. SSA
Sep 09, 2013OUTCOME: Claim remanded for new hearing
Social Security's judge approved this claim, but did so with an onset date that made no sense. We appealed to USDC, which sent the case back to the Agency to determine an onset date supported by the m ... edical evidence.
Nolan v. SSA
Dec 15, 2011OUTCOME: Remanded by the Court for a new hearing.
Agency's ALJ failed to state the weight given to a treating physician's opinion.
Matthews v. SSA
Nov 17, 2011OUTCOME: After briefing, the Agency requested a remand for a new hearing.
In this hard-fought case, the Agency first moved to dismiss the complaint, filed by the claimant pro se, as untimely. After that was defeated, both sides argued the merits of the case to the court.
Brown v. SSA
Nov 01, 2011OUTCOME: Claim remanded again, for what will be a third hearing.
In this claim's second trip to District Court, we argued that the Agency again failed to properly state the weight given to a treating physician's opinion.
Cotterman-Henson v. SSA
Mar 11, 2011OUTCOME: Claim remanded by the Court for a new hearing.
The Agency failed to consider new and material evidence generated after the ALJ hearing.
Durbin v. SSA
Jan 19, 2011OUTCOME: Agency agreed to remand for new hearing
The Agency failed to properly consider a treating physician's opinion, and improperly equated "somatic" symptoms with "fake" symptoms.
Goetz v. Greater Georgia Life Insurance Company
Aug 19, 2009OUTCOME: The Court found that the insurance company's decision was arbitrary and capricious, and reversed the decision, ordering benefits paid to Mr. Goetz.
Mr. Goetz was denied benefits under an Accidental Death and Dismemberment policy after he suffered several falls and a resulting subdural hematoma. The insurance company claimed that the falls were th ... e result of a pre-existing condition.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
