Adam T. Gusdorff

Adam T. Gusdorff

5.0
Rating: 9.9

Licensed for 24 years

Litigation Lawyer at West Conshohocken, PA
Practice Areas: Litigation, Trusts

100 Four Falls, Suite 300, West Conshohocken, PA

About Adam

Practice Areas

2

Practice Areas

Litigation 90%

I litigate all forms of trust and estate matters, including Will contests, probate disputes, fiduciary surcharge and removal, document interpretation, administration of charitable funds, and guardianships. I also assist with trust and estate administration issues. Although it is not currently part of my practice, I have extensive experience in estate planning and the formation/governance of charitable organizations.

90%
Trusts 10%

I work on a variety of trust and estate administration matters, including fiduciary accountings, modification and other nonjudicial settlement agreements, and other administrative matters.

10%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Pennsylvania for 24 years

State: Pennsylvania

Acquired: 2001

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Heckscher, Teillon, Terrill & Sager, PC

100 Four Falls, Suite 300, West Conshohocken, PA, 19428

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Adam T. Gusdorff's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

2 Client Reviews

5 star (2)
4 star (0)
3 star (0)
2 star (0)
1 star (0)

Posted by Daen | April 6, 2018 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

The abilities to listen, understand and support are essential for a good lawyer

Lawyers are much like mercenaries. You hire them to fight for you typically because you have some conflict where you need their help. Thus most lawyers work in an adversarial environment. When you hire someone you want them to accomplish your agenda, so you hire someone with a strong enough abilit...y to do so. Having dealt with many lawyers I have seen this environment affect them differently. Some it becomes part of them, affecting their behavior towards clients. You can be left feeling like a very unintelligent bug that they have to deal with because you are not versed in law, or the dollar value is not worth their time, etc. There are some with the ability to successfully resolve your conflict and leave you feeling you were supported rather than one of the obstacles. Adam is one of these. We had a corporate family trust that had migrated through a number of banks via acquisitions. It ended up in a very large bank. The two family members most involved were older. One, a homemaker with no knowledge of business or banks, the other having a very unusual character. The relation with the bank was very adversarial to the point they used trust funds to hire an outside group to attempt to get the unusual executor declared incompetent and incited various government agencies. Adam stepped into this conflict and was not the first lawyer. He dealt with the family, the numerous obvious questions of the elder family member, the delays as we all still had to work various jobs. He listened, he advised, and he acted effectively. The matter was eventually resolved and the trust was moved to a place of the family's choosing. As cliche as it sounds, working with Adam through this was more like working with a friend than a hired lawyer.

Posted by Stan | June 26, 2015

Confidently navigated our complex guardianship situation

We were in the middle of a very complicated and confusing guardianship situation when a friend gave us Adam Gusdorff's name. We spoke with multiple lawyers who could not understand our case or how to help us. After our first conversation with Adam we knew we had finally found our lawyer. His prof...essionalism and confidence instantly put us at ease. His knowledge of the law and his precise execution of the strategy he set forth put us ahead of our adversaries and ultimately won our case. He was always available in emergencies if we needed him and responded promptly to all of our questions and emails. We would not hesitate to reengage with Adam for any of our guardianship needs and confidently recommend him for anyone facing the intricate matters of guardianship.

See All Client Reviews

Adam T. Gusdorff's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Adam

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  9.9 (Superb)

Honors

2017

Best Lawyers, Trust and Estate Litigation, Best Lawyers in America

2016

Super Lawyer, Trust and Estate Litigation, Super Lawyers

2016

Best Lawyers, Trust and Estate Litigation, Best Lawyers in America

2015

Super Lawyer, Trust and Estate Litigation, Super Lawyers

2011

Rising Star, Trust and Estate Litigation, Super Lawyers

2010

Rising Star, Trust and Estate Litigation, Super Lawyers

2008

Rising Star, Trust and Estate Litigation, Super Lawyers

Work Experience

2012 - Present

Partner, Heckscher, Teillon, Terrill & Sager, PC

2010 - 2012

Of Counsel, Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll

2005 - 2010

Associate, Mannion Prior LLP

2001 - 2005

Associate, Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll

Associations

2016 - Present

American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Fellow

2012 - Present

Temple University School of Law

Adjunct Professor; Orphans' Court Pleadings and Trial Practice

2001 - Present

Philadelphia Bar Association

Chair, Probate Sec., Orphans' Ct Litigation Comm. (2014-pres)

2001 - Present

Pennsylvania Bar Association

Sample of Legal Cases

Levit Estate (No. 2), 1 Fiduc. Rep. 3d 234 (O.C. Montg. 2011)

Court denied spouse's claim and upheld estate's claim.

Levit Estate, 29 Fiduc. Rep. 2d 250 (O.C. Montg. 2009)

Court agreed with our position on what the burdens were and what evidence the estate could present to successfully defend the claim.

Estate of Sally C. Vanderkraats, 27 Fiduc. Rep. 2d 328 (O.C. Chester 2007), aff'd 972 A.2d 567 (Pa. Super. 2008)

On summary judgment, in a case of first impression under 20 Pa. C.S. s 2514, we convinced the Court that the forfeited interest passed to the surviving spouse.

Estate of Marjorie T. McCann, 27 Fiduc. Rep. 2d 100 (O.C. Montg. 2007)

The Court agreed with us that the decedent's intent controlled, and that the child's share of the estate was offset by the balance of the loan, even though it had been discharged.

Estate of Clinton Miles Robison, 26 Fiduc. Rep. 2d 493 (O.C. Phila. 2006)

Court agreed with us that the clause was not sufficiently specific and directed that the recipients of the non-probate assets were responsible for the tax on such assets.

Estate of Max Kravitz (No. 2), 26 Fiduc. Rep. 2d 406 (O.C. Montg. 2006)

Court re-opened the 1966 adjudication on grounds that the executor had not filed a court-ordered schedule of distribution and had not provided notice to our client that an account had been filed.

See More Legal Cases

Education

2001

Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1990

Pennsylvania State University, University Park (main campus)

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2015

Pennsylvania Bar Institute

The Dead Man's Rule

2015

Pennsylvania Bar Institute

Litigating in Orphans' Court

2014

Pennsylvania Bar Institute

Hot Topics in Fiduciary Litigation

2014

Pennsylvania Bar Institute

Trial of a Will Contest

2014

Montgomery County Estate Planning Council

O.C. Litigation Update: UTA and Settlement Agreements

2013

Pennsylvania Bar Institute

The Dead Man's Rule

2012

Philadelphia Bar Association, Probate and Trust Law Section

Orphans' Court for the Estate and Trust Practitioner

2012

Pennsylvania Bar Institute

Utilizing Expert Witnesses in the Orphans' Court

2011

Philadelphia Bar Association, Bench-Bar Conference

Orphans' Court for the Uninitiated

2011

Pennsylvania Bar Institute

LItigating in Orphans' Court

2011

Estate Law Institute

Dead Men Tell No Tales, So Neither Can You

2010

Estate Law Institute

Remedies in the Orphans' Court

2007

Pennsylvania Bar Institute

Orphans' Court Practice and Procedure

2003

CLE for Free

Beyond the Will: What Every Lawyer Should KNow About Living Wills and Other Personal Planning Tools

Publications

2011

Philadelphia Bar Association Probate and Trust Law Section Quarterly Bosley Estate and DeHass Estate Further Develop Issue of Capacity to Execute a Power of Attorney

2011

Pennsylvania Bar Association, Real Property, Probate and Tax Section Newsletter Litigating a "No-Contest" Clause

2010

Philadelphia Bar Association Probate and Trust Law Section Quarterly Sipe Estate and Waiver of the Dead Man's Rule

2003

Philadelphia Bar Association Probate and Trust Law Section Quarterly Decoupling the Pennsylvania Estate Tax from the Federal Estate Tax

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution