$ 650-800 per hour
Edward T. Kang
About Edward
Biography
Edward T. Kang, managing member of the firm Kang Haggerty & Fetbroyt LLC, devotes full time of his practice to business litigation and other litigation involving business entities. While Edward has significant experience representing both plaintiffs and defendants, he focuses on representing plaintiffs who have been wronged by others. Unlike many litigation attorneys who never or rarely try a case in court, Edward regularly tries cases, including jury trials. He tried many different types of business cases, including a partnership breakup case and shareholder breakup case, securities fraud case, and wrongful interference of business relationship case. He also tried many types of cases involving business entities, including construction litigation and trade secret litigation.
Practice Areas
1
Practice Area
Litigation
100%
25 years
Fees and Rates
Cost
Hourly Rates
Contingency
33%-40%
Payment Methods
- Cash
- Check
- Credit Card
Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.
Search our directory
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withLicenses
Licensed in New York for 18 years
State: New York
Acquired: 2008
No misconduct found
Licensed in New Jersey for 24 years
State: New Jersey
Acquired: 2001
No misconduct found
Licensed in Pennsylvania for 24 years
State: Pennsylvania
Acquired: 2001
No misconduct found
Location
Kang Haggerty & Fetbroyt LLC
123 South Broad Street, Suite 1670, Philadelphia, PA, 19109
Gallery
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
Edward T. Kang's Reviews
Avvo Review Score
3 Client Reviews
Filter Avvo Reviews (3)
Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Practice Areas
Showing 1 - 2 of 2 reviews | Business
Posted by Stephen | February 26, 2014 | Business
Extremely Satisfied and Excellent to work with
I have worked with Edward on several matters. He is very personable and an excellent lawyer with a thorough understanding of business and damages. Edward is adept at applying practical solutions to complex legal matters.
Posted by anonymous | February 21, 2014 | Business
Trusted Advisor
Edward is a very capable attorney and litigator that has the mind of a business person. He took the time to understand a very complex financial/accounting issue and then applied a thoughtful approach to the litigation. He is aggressive and is a strong advocate for his clients. I value his opinion...
Edward T. Kang's Lawyer Endorsements
"Edward is an excellent business attorney. I am glad to have been able to collaborate with him and would recommend him to those with highly complex cases."
"I worked with Edward for several years on a variety of matters centered around business and banking litigation. Edward is a diligent and thoughtful advocate who takes the time to understand the client's business to better position the case for either settlement or final disposition. His experience spans all forms of dispute resolution across various jurisdictions. I wholeheartedly endorse Edward."
"I endorse this lawyer. Edward is an excellent attorney. He is always well prepared and he fights for his client. I highly recommend him."
"I endorse this lawyer."
Kandis Kovalsky
Litigation lawyer
Experience
Honors
2017
AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell
2015
Awesome Attorney, South Jersey Magazine
2010
Rising Star, Super Lawyers
2008
Rising Star, Super Lawyers
Work Experience
2013 - Present
Managing Member, Kang Haggerty & Fetbroyt LLC
Associations
2017 - Present
National Association of Minority and Women Owned Law FirmsMember
2013 - Present
National Asian Pacific American Bar AssociationMember
2008 - Present
The Union League of PhiladelphiaMember
2003 - Present
Pennsylvania Bar AssociationMember
2003 - Present
Philadelphia Bar AssociationMember
2001 - Present
American Bar AssociationMember
Sample of Legal Cases
Vizant Technologies, LLC v. Whitchurch and Davis
Judgement in favor of Vizant for over $2.2 million including attorney's fees
Snitow v. Snitow
Judgement in favor of plaintiff
Milestone Construction Management Inc. v. Stein, et al.
Decision in favor of Milestone Construction Management, Inc., Edward T. Kang's client
LJL Transp., Inc. v. Pilot Air Freight Corp.
Decision in favor of Edward T. Kang's client
Triffin v. Third Federal Savings Bank
Decision in favor of Edward T. Kang's client
Education
2001
Villanova University School of Law
JD - Juris Doctor
N/A
Temple University
BA - Bachelor of Arts
Speaking Engagements
2020
Strafford
D&O Indemnification Provisions in Corporate Governance Documents: Implementing 2020 DOJ Guidance
2018
National Association of Minority and Women Owned Law Firms
Emojis Speaking Louder than Words
Publications
2018
The Legal Intelligencer
The Forgotten and Often Misunderstood Sections of RICO
2018
The Legal Intelligencer
Key Points in Negotiating and Preparing Settlement Agreements and Releases
2018
The Legal Intelligencer
Should an Arbitrator Determine Arbitrability Where a Claim Is 'Wholly Groundless'?
2018
The Legal Intelligencer
Why Lawyers Should Care About Emojis
2018
The Legal Intelligencer
Borrowing Statute: NY's Bar to the Unsuspecting, Out-of-State Investor
2018
The Legal Intelligencer
When Noncompete Agreements Involve Competing Laws
2017
The Legal Intelligencer
Act 170 Changes the Business Landscape in Pennsylvania
2017
The Legal Intelligencer
What Rights Do I Have as a Limited Partner Against a General Partner?
2017
The Legal Intelligencer
Could Lawyers Be Held Liable to Nonclients for Negligence in Pa?
2017
The Legal Intelligencer
Through the Language Barrier: Examining a Witness Through Interpreters
2017
The Legal Intelligencer
Be Careful What You Say in Settlement Discussions
2017
The Legal Intelligencer
Objection, Hearsay! Or Is It? Understanding the Hearsay Rule
2017
The Legal Intelligencer
How to Effectively Work With Millennials as Employees and Clients
2017
The Legal Intelligencer
Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016—One-Year Later, Now What?
2017
The Legal Intelligencer
I (Think) I'm Ready for My First Trial. Do I Want a Jury or Nonjury Trial?
2016
Law Practice Today (ABA)
Diversity and Its Impact on the Legal Profession
2016
Pennsylvania Law Weekly
Be Careful Before Relying on the Common Interest Doctrine
2016
The Legal Intelligencer
Class Action Rule Changes Are (Likely) Coming to Federal Courts
2016
The Legal Intelligencer
Accountants Have No Duty of Care Toward Third-Party Investors, or Do They?
2016
The Legal Intelligencer
The Defend Trade Secrets Act and Its Impact on Trade Secret Litigation
2016
The Legal Intelligencer
Practical Guide to Restrictive Covenants in PA and NJ
2016
The Legal Intelligencer
M&As and Attorney-Client Privilege of Selling Corporations
2016
The Legal Intelligencer
Lateral Hiring and the Small, Boutique Law Firm
2016
The Legal Intelligencer
CFAA: Its impact on Employer-Employee Litigation
2015
Philadelphia Business Journal
Why your company needs a business valuation – today
2015
Philadelphia Business Journal
Somebody slammed you online! How to protect the reputation of your business
2014
Kang Haggerty & Fetbroyt Blog
Follow the Bright Line Road
2014
The Philadelphia Business Journal
The three big reasons family businesses fail ... and how to avoid them
2013
Kang Haggerty & Fetbroyt Blog
DODD FRANK'S IMPACT ON THE FALSE CLAIMS ACT
2013
KANG HAGGERTY & FETBROYT LLC BLOG
THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT AND HOW IT AFFECTS THE WHISTLEBLOWER
2003
Morgan Lewis on Life Sciences
BIOTECH COMPANIES RAISE CAPITAL WITHOUT DILUTING EQUITY STRUCTURE BY MONETIZING IP LICENSES
Languages
English
Korean
Activity
Legal Answers