Darius C. Gambino

Darius C. Gambino

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 8.7

Licensed for 26 years

Patent infringement Lawyer at Philadelphia, PA
Practice Areas: Patent Infringement, Trademark Application, Litigation ... +3 more

One Liberty Place, 1650 Market Street, Suite 4900, Philadelphia, PA

About Darius

Practice Areas

6

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in District of Columbia for 26 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 2000

Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in Pennsylvania for 26 years

State: Pennsylvania

Acquired: 1999

Active

No misconduct found

Location

DLA Piper US LLP

One Liberty Place, 1650 Market Street, Suite 4900, Philadelphia, PA, 19103-7301

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Darius C. Gambino's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Darius C. Gambino's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Darius

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  8.7 (Excellent)

Honors

2015

The World's Leading Trademark Professionals (WTR1000), World Trademark Review

2014

The World's Leading Trademark Professionals (WTR1000), World Trademark Review

2013

The World's Leading Trademark Professionals (WTR1000), World Trademark Review

2012

Volunteer of the Year, Philadelphia Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts

Work Experience

2003 - Present

Partner, DLA Piper US, LLP

1999 - 2003

Associate, Duane Morris, LLP

1997 - 1999

Patent Agent, Dicksten Shapiro Morin Oshinksy, LLP

1993 - 1997

Patent Examiner, US Patent & Trademark Office

Associations

2001 - Present

The Recording Academy

Member

2000 - Present

International Trademark Association

Member

1999 - Present

Philadelphia Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts

Member

1998 - Present

American Bar Association

Member

1996 - Present

American Intellectual Property Law Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Measurement Specialties, Inc. v. LogiPen et al.

Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc. v. American Specialties, Inc.

Measurement Specialties, Inc. v. Sensaras LLC et al.

April Cornell v. Everfast et al.

See More Legal Cases

Education

1998

Catholic University of America, School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1993

Villanova University

B.S.E.E.

Speaking Engagements

2015

American Law Institute

Fair Use or Foul: Transformation, Derivative Works, and What Remains of Traditional Tests in a Digital Age

2014

International Trademark Association Annual Meeting

Table Topic TM 68: The Future of Trade Dress

2013

Strafford Publications Webinar

Trade Dress and Design Patent: Leveraging Recent Lessons to Maximize Protection

2013

DELVACCA's Intellectual Property CLE Institute

Intellectual Property Protection for Product Designs: The Search for an IP Trifecta

2010

The Legal Intelligencer’s In-House Counsel Seminar

Intellectual Property Protection for Product Designs: The Search for an IP Trifecta

2010

American Law Institute

Trade Secrets and Covenants Not to Compete: Whose Secret Is It Anyway?

2009

American Law Institute

Results May Vary, Bloggers Be Wary: The FTC’s Newly-Revised Guides on Endorsements and Testimonials

2008

American Intellectual Property Law Association Annual Meeting

Avoiding Obviousness Determinations Post-KSR: The Five Paths to Obviousness and How To Avoid Them

2005

Marbury Institute Series

Patent Law for Corporate Lawyers

2001

The Computer Practice Committee Meeting of the Philadelphia Intellectual Property Law Association

What’s Left of the Doctrine of Equivalents

Publications

2012

2011

The Legal Intelligencer The America Invents Act in Action: Abolishing the First-to-Invent Approach and Stemming the Tide of False Marking Lawsuits

2010

Portfolio Media (Law360) An IP Trifecta For Production Configurations

2009

Portfolio Media (Law360) The State Of Infringement Damages In The 3rd Circuit

2008

The Legal Intelligencer Pleading Patent Infringement to Spin a Jurisdictional Webb

2008

The Legal Intelligencer The New IP: Common Law Misappropriation Protection for Financial Information

2007

The Legal Intelligencer Some Sage Advice on the Doctrine of Equivalents

2003

ABA Young Lawyer Division, Intellectual Property and Internet Law Committee Newsletter Claim Drafter's Guide to Festo IX

2002

The Legal Intelligencer Another Wipeout For the Doctrine of Equivalents

2001

Federal Circuit Bar Journal A New Weapon For Alleged Infringers?: Patent Drafter Estoppel Explored

2000

The Legal Intelligencer Federal Circuit Shows Recent Trend of Narrowing Patent Claims Under DOE

1999

The Legal Intelligencer Whose Review Standard Is It Anyway?: Supreme Court provides guidance in Zurko
Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution