No Photo

Paul David Woosley

Licensed for 13 years

Lawyer at Doylestown, PA

72 N Main St, Woosley Naragon Llc, Doylestown, PA

Claim Profile

Is this your profile? Claiming it is free and only takes 2 minutes.

About Paul

Practice Areas

This attorney has not specified their practice areas.

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Pennsylvania for 13 years

State: Pennsylvania

Acquired: 2013

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Woosley Naragon LLC

72 N Main St, Woosley Naragon Llc, Doylestown, PA, 18901-3728

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Paul David Woosley's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

1.0 /5.0

3 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (3) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 0
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 3
Practice Areas

Showing 1 - 3 of 3 reviews

Posted by anonymous | May 19, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Child Custody

Stay away from this place if you want real representation.

No help, no respect. Once held accountable he felt the need to disrespect me as a client in my situation and exhausted my $1,000 for doing absolutely no work… asking for $600 more once I ask for a transcript. It’s because of them that I barely get to see my child!

Posted by anonymous | January 17, 2025 | Hired Attorney | Landlord & Tenant

Horrible Representation

I was drawn into a Landlord-Tenant (L/T) lawsuit by the estranged wife of my deceased tenant. What ensued was insanity & extortion. I looked to David Woosley (DW) for help since I worked with him in the past. He began helping, but what I came to understand eventually, was that he & his team had no re...al knowledge of this type of law, and it is extensive. When you know nothing as a layperson, you're completely dependent on your atty being honest about their abilities in that particular field. They could simply tell you that you clearly need someone who specializes in that field, rather than dive in, take your money & make a bigger mess. One of my main issues is that ALL of our legal defense through DW was entirely made up of my ideas, which were based in common sense, logic & fairness, which we all know is not how the legal system actually works. DW was looking to me for answers all along– I was crafting the communications with the opposing side – a small amount of legal jargon was then added & they were sent off to the opposition as if this was a sound defense, but in reality there was no basis in L/T law. Months later, when things seemed to be going obviously wrong, I contacted multiple other lawyers & a retired judge – all who specialize in L/T law. Each one had various reasons why DW had mishandled my situation. I had to end my relationship with DW & hire someone else – only after having spent about $7500. Some suggested malpractice, but I didn't want to spend more money on this frivolous suit. When I went to DW with this information, he obviously defended his position. I asked for a refund of at least a portion of my invoice – with a laundry list of reasons (both my own & those of experts in this field). In particular, I was requesting reimbursement for the cost of his 'Answer to Complaint', which was described by the experts as 'flowery', 'excessive' & holding no legal standing or protocol – almost entirely filled with my writings & musings – as if I was the legal expert in L/T law – no legal basis whatsoever. But how would I have known this at the time?! Dave wrote that he & his asst “thought” it's what I wanted. So I paid for something that took many hours/days to create, and it was only a reiteration of my own thoughts – not an actual lawyer's, with knowledge & experience in this field. Eventually, DW said he would think about this & promised to get back to me (in writing). I reached out multiple times & each time he stated it would take some time, but that he would reply. He never did. My last communication was Nov 2024. He never replied to this one, and thus I'm realizing I was duped & decided to make my experience with him public. If you want a lawyer who allows you to do all the work, uses your opinions as a legal defense, and then charges you a ridiculous amount for minimal work, David Woosley is your guy.

Posted by anonymous | April 12, 2024 | Hired Attorney

Crook,Thief,CRUMB

Biggest slime ball out there. STAY AWAY FROM THIS SCUMBAG OF A HUMAN

See All Client Reviews

Paul David Woosley's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Paul

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution