No Photo

Chrystyna M. Fenchen

Licensed for 45 years

Family Lawyer at Hellertown, PA
Practice Areas: Family

3686 Lower Saucon Rd, Hellertown, PA

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2014
See Details
Claim Profile

Is this your profile? Claiming it is free and only takes 2 minutes.

About Chrystyna

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Pennsylvania for 45 years

State: Pennsylvania

Acquired: 1980

Administrative Suspension

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2014

Location

Law Offices of Chrystyna M. Fenchen

3686 Lower Saucon Rd, Hellertown, PA, 18055-3251

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Chrystyna M. Fenchen's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

1.0 /5.0

2 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (2) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | General Knowledge

Posted by Maria | December 26, 2011 | Child Custody

Absolutely Terrible

Ms. Fenchen was my attorney for my divorce, custody and child support case. I reside out of state and my ex spouse relocated to PA and initiated the case. Over the course of 10 months she repeatedly failed to obtain any favorable results in my case despite assurances my case was "winnable". Motions ...were frivolous, continuances were exhausted, she constantly appeared unprepared and perplexed when opposing counsel began cross examinations or appeared with faulty evidence. After a few hearings it became clear she was not aggressive enough, ill prepared and made assurances when the exact opposite would happen. the ultimate failure came to with child support---a portion of the case that should have been straightforward. After I gathered over 30 pages worth of documentation showing my wages, expenses, etc she appeared to the hearing on my behalf and according to domestics own admission did a terrible job of representing me. She never produced the documentation I sent and it resulted in an order I could not reasonably pay--- by any stretch. I was automatically placed in arrears for over 4 months and my wages were then garnished at 65%, notices were sent that my tax returns and bank accounts had liens against them and my driver's license was in danger of being suspended.....I was forced to survive on $30-40/week for all my expenses and collect food stamps while I begged and pleaded with her to appeal or modify or I was facing jail for "willful non-payment of child support"---despite the fact that everyone, including my exhusband acknowledged in court the order was wrong. I was repeatedly assured she was completing it or it was being done, not to worry. 6 months after the initial cs hearing, I was summoned to a contempt hearing because even tho my wages were being garnished at the maximum legal amount and I was working 3 jobs---I was still being accused of failure to pay cs. WILLFUL non-payment. The day of my hearing she was nowhere to be found, I had two hours to come up with several thousand dollars or convince my ex to drop the arrears or go to jail for 90 days. I ended up having to settle everything pro se. Alone, desperate and at the end of my rope all I got from the court system was that I should have found another attorney, however unfair or incorrect or inane the court proceedings were I was out litigated. I had previously asked she withdraw herself, she never did, saying she could do this I had called her since 6am the day of hearing, having left my home state at 4am to attend it. I gave the opposing party everything they wanted because I couldn't afford 90 days in jail, lose jobs, possibly attend a full blown trial while in custody a week later and top off serve it in a state I don't live and don't have family. I settled for a pittance of visitation with my two toddlers, gave a no fault divorce, forwent all marital assets, retirement, etc and regretfully walked away from my child custody case (if Ms, Fenchen could not be found when she knew I was facing jail for a child support order she failed to properly represent me at I knew I could not afford to have her represent me at the trial). The icing on the cake was when the court staff and the judge herself told me I desperately needed a new attorney. The domestics officer apologized profusely, said she was sorry if she had known the facts 6 months earlier she would have never placed the order as high as she did but she never saw the documentation i had before that day. That there was no reason my case should have turned out this way. Ms. Fenchen was also notably the related to opposing counsel. There was a severe conflict of interest that caused unneeded animosity and made any settlement of my case impossible. Despite her confidence it would not be a problem, working against her ex-spouse became a nightmare for me. After the retainer was paid I was stuck. She was my last chance.

See All Client Reviews

Chrystyna M. Fenchen's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Chrystyna

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Professional misconduct

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2014.

Suspension issued in PA, 2014

updated on 07/10/2014

Suspended means an attorney lost his or her license to practice law for a period of time. The attorney typically returns to practicing law when the suspension expires.

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline
    This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2014
    Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution