Tulsa, OK
Employment and labor Lawyer at Tulsa, OK
Practice Areas: Employment & Labor, Personal Injury ... +2 more
OUTCOME: Jury Verdict in favor of client in the amount of $250,000.
Holbird alleged that Allen Canning caused him to leave the roadway in his log truck, causing damages to his truck and personal injury.
OUTCOME: Jury verdict in favor of client, awarding $113,000 in compensatory damages, plus punitive damages of $250,000. Total Judgment, with attny fees was $413,964.51. On appeal, the punitive damages award was vacated, but the remaining damages award was upheld.
Representation of employee in employment discrimination and retaliation case, whereby client alleged sexual harassment and retaliation by female supervisor. Jury trial in federal district court.
OUTCOME: Jury verdict in favor of client in the amount of $250,000, affirmed on appeal to US Court of Appeals for 8th Cir.
Represented Ms. Chapman in medical negligence action focused on the negligent insertion of an endotracheal tube by a CRNA. Injury to client's esophagus resulting in subsequent hospitalization and repai ... r of perforation. Byars also handled appeal to US Court of Appeals for the 8th Cir.
OUTCOME: Jury verdict in favor of client, resulting in the entry of Judgment in the amount of $142,000.
Representation of Mr. Hill in breach of contract action against Sebastian County, which asserted that the parties did not actually enter into a valid and binding contract.
OUTCOME: Jury verdict resulting in Judgment of $275,695.00
Represented plaintiff in breach of contract action involving the interpretation of contract. The Jury agreed with plaintiff, resulting in jury verdict.
OUTCOME: Jury verdict awarding damages of $101,292.90
Representation of Plaintiff in nursing home negligence action, alleging nursing home failed to protect Mr. Raper from falling. Jury trial in Greenwood, Ar., resulting in jury verdict in favor of client ... .
OUTCOME: Jury verdict in favor of client with judgment entered in excess of $4.7 million. Affirmed on Appeal to US Court of Appeals. Award under the Robinson Patman Act was ultimately vacated at US Supreme Court, but damages under state law affirmed.
Represented heavy truck dealer alleging claims against manufacturer based on the violation of the Arkansas Franchise Practices Act, and the Robinson-Patman Act, alleging price discrimination and unfair ... business practices. Jury trial resulted in Judgment entered in the amount of $4,784,020.42. Appeal to US Court of Appeal and US Supreme Court.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
