Vancouver, WA
Workers compensation Lawyer at Vancouver, WA
Practice Areas: Workers Compensation
OUTCOME: A rejection order is a appropriate and the Board had the jurisdiction to affirm rejection.
Whether a final allowance order can be set aside merely because a worker settled a maritime claim for the same injury. Whether the Board could affirm a rejection order when the Department filed to Pet ... ition for Review the Industrial Appeals Judge's decision to reverse the rejection order and affirm claim allowance.
OUTCOME: If the Department or Self-Insured Employer authorizes treatment, then that is a binding admission they have accepted responsibility for the condition being treated.
Whether authorization of knee surgery is a binding acceptance of the underling condition being treated by the surgery
OUTCOME: Attending physicians play a special role in workers compensation cases and jurors should always be instructed of that role.
Whether a Court is required to give the Attending Physician Instruction in all workers compensation cases.
OUTCOME: The Court decided it does not have jurisdiction.
Does the Court have the jurisdiction to hear appeals where the Health Technology Clinical Committee determines a medical technology is not covered in the State of Washington.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
