Randy S. Margulis

PRO

Randy S. Margulis

4.0
Rating: 9.9

Licensed for 33 years

Divorce and separation Lawyer at Williamsville, NY
Practice Areas: Divorce & Separation, Family, Child Custody

19 Limestone Drive, Suite 9, Williamsville, NY

Virtual Consultation Available

About Randy

Reviewers Often Mention

Based on insights from 41 Avvo reviews of this attorney.

Advocacy

Case Results

Professionalism

Responsiveness

Biography

Tough, aggressive, personal representation, fighting for you so you don't have to.

Tough and aggressive representation, protecting you and your children.

Tough, aggressive, personal representation, fighting for you so you don't have to.

Tough, aggressive, personal representation, fighting for you so you don't have to.

Practice Areas

3

Practice Areas

Divorce and Separation 50%

50%
Child Custody 25%

25%
Family 25%

Child Custody matters.

11 years

25%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer

Awards

Client's Choice
Client's Choice
2016 2014 2012
Gold Client Champion
Distinguished Peer Review Rating
Super Lawyer

Licenses

Licensed in New York for 33 years

State: New York

Acquired: 1993

Currently Registered

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Randy S. Margulis

19 Limestone Drive, Suite 9, Williamsville, NY, 14221

randymargulis.com/

Online Presence

Other places you can find Randy online.

Randy S. Margulis's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.0 /5.0

41 Client Reviews


Client Insights

Avvo uses AI to summarize reviews left for lawyers, providing a helpful overview of overall sentiment. Each summary is based on up to 500 of the most recent reviews and is refreshed upon submission of each new review. The number of reviews used may be displayed.

AI-summarized from Avvo client reviews

Many reviewers praise the lawyer for being highly knowledgeable, responsive, and assertive in court, particularly in divorce and custody cases. They often highlight successful outcomes and compassionate support. A smaller number of reviews also note concerns regarding communication, preparation, and billing.

Showing 21 - 25 of 28 reviews | Advocacy

Posted by Joseph | May 22, 2012

I Highly Recommend

I had a great experience with Mr. Margulis. He explained the law, and my circumstances legally, before going to court, so I knew what to expect. He was very knowledgeable and forceful in court. He won my case!

Posted by Jack | November 25, 2018 | Hired Attorney

A nice guy, but...

It has been a year since my divorce, and I am just now able to express my frustrations. Briefly: 1) I made a video of the work I had to do solo at the barn, caring for 6 horses. I do not know that he ever showed the judge the video-only 5 minutes long, but explained a lot; 2) He asked my ex-wife for ...an inventory of what she took from the house (everything). She never complied and the value of those items was never considered in resolving money owed to her; 3) She never provided information in financial disclosure and he never obtained this. I was the one who found out about undisclosed cash and forced that amount ($20,000) to be shared; 4) Especially at the end, Randy was unresponsive to emails and calls. He blamed his lapse in responding (of several weeks) on an email problem he was having. Maybe, but the problem was always present. There were other problems, but in summation, I am sure Randy knows the law, but I never felt he was advocating for me. There was never a meeting to try and work things out until the day of trial, when I was faced with losing everything I had left if I did not agree to terms to which I had minimal input. At $400 an hour, I expected a more vigorous defense and responsiveness.

Randy Margulis

Replied last November 25, 2018

It is unfortunate that this client, whom I enjoyed representing, is dissatisfied a year after his divorce. Videos, and other evidence, are typically only presentable to a judge if there is a trial. This client, Jack, voluntarily chose to settle his case without a trial, and did end up with a result likely better for him than a trial would have provided. This case involved horses, which the law recognizes as property. Jack and I fought for, and received, a resolution that allowed Jack to retain possession of the horses, with whom he was bonded, and further receive financial credit for expenses he incurs caring for them. Jack received aggressive representation, as all my clients, at a rate less than the $400 he has inaccurately suggested.

Posted by anonymous | September 15, 2026 | Hired Attorney

DO NOT USE THIS LAWYER! POOR RESULTS UNRESPONSIVE!

Paid thousands in retainer fee for Custody lawsuit. Never got to court for Custody as a negligence matter had preminance. The lawyer allowed DSS to handle and decide custody with little or no advocacy on my behalf. My custody case never came to trial. I received no services and recieved No refund of... retainer. My children are lost to me and in a terribly unfortunate placement. The lawyer doesn't return phone calls very unresponsive! DO NOT USE THIS LAWYER. WORTHLESS! RIP OFF!

Randy Margulis

Replied last September 17, 2026

Unfortunately this person did not identify themself, so I have no idea who it is. However, if they lost custody because of Neglect or Abuse, the County must have had overwhelming evidence against them. Abuse cases do not proceed to the Custody determination level until the parent is exonerated of the abuse or neglect allegations, which, here, must have been difficult at best to overcome.

Posted by anonymous | March 04, 2025 | Hired Attorney

Negligent practices

Withholds important information just to drag your case out so he can charge you more money never returns calls and doesn’t say a word in the courtroom he doesn’t care about you as a client at all

Posted by anonymous | January 07, 2022 | Hired Attorney

Don't Bother

DO NOT HIRE Randy. He takes on too many cases. More than what him or his associates can handle. Never remembers anything about your case. Have to spend the first 15 minutes of each conversation reminding him of information that was already given. He talks a big game when you have your initial co...nsultation, but does not actually follow through. Also says that " You are paying me, so essentially you are my boss." He will not "advise" you against something. Will just state "No, I'm not doing that". Every time I had correspondence with Randy, he either wrote in an email, or spoke to me oh the phone like I was stupid. He also showed aggravation and annoyance every time we spoke and he is very argumentative. Randy is also "very busy" because he ends up suing a lot of his clients. Lastly, one thing to think about. If you do your diligence of researching attorneys, how many other attorney's waste their time responding to negative reviews. If you already hired Randy, or going to hire him anyways, last piece of advice is; Know your rights and options as a client, read the retainer agreement VERY Carefully

Randy Margulis

Replied last February 20, 2023

It is difficult to respond to an anonymous review. It would appear that this anonymous client likely wished to pursue some type of improper strategy, which might explain a "no" response. I take detailed notes during every session I have with a client, and rarely sue clients. Perhaps this client and I just did not see eye to eye on things, which sometimes happens.

See All Client Reviews

Randy S. Margulis's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Randy
Elizabeth M. Dipirro headshot
Elizabeth Dipirro

Divorce and separation lawyer | Jul 02

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Michael Paul LeMond headshot
Michael LeMond

Family lawyer | Jan 11

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. I am proud to endorse this attorney as a person who provides competent counsel AND takes the time to answer questions on Avvo to help out others. You make us all look better, THANKS!"

Paul W. Wolf headshot
Paul Wolf

Family lawyer | Jul 15

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer."

Michael S. Waddington headshot
Michael Waddington

Family lawyer | Jun 01

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse Randy. He is a highly skilled attorney that is well respected in the legal community."

Shawn Robert Ruben headshot
Shawn Ruben

Divorce and separation lawyer | Feb 11

Relationship: Other

"I endorse this lawyer. Randy has a long track record of execellent work for his clients and is a recognized expert in his field."

Nicholas Vincent Loizzi headshot
Nicholas Loizzi

Divorce and separation lawyer | Jan 21

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Randy is a skilled attorney who possesses the knowledge and know-how to represent his clients. I would want him to represent me. Randy's passion for what he does and his tireless representation of his clients makes him a true standout in our field."

View All Endorsements
Mark Henry Cantor headshot
Mark Cantor

Personal injury lawyer

Nicholas Vincent Loizzi headshot
Nicholas Loizzi

Personal injury lawyer

Experience

Rating:  9.9 (Superb)

Honors

2025

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2024

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2023

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2022

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2021

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2020

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2019

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2017

Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2016

Distinguished, Martindale-Hubbell

2016

Client Distinction Award, Martindale-Hubbell

2015

Client Distinction Award, Martindale-Hubbell

2015

10 Best, American Institute of Family Law Attorneys

2015

Buffalo's Finest, Artvoice

2014

Distinguished Attorney Award, Martindale-Hubbell

2014

Clients' Choice, Avvo

2013

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2012

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2012

Distinguished For Ethical Standards and Legal Ability, Martindale-Hubbell

2007

Pro Bono Award, Bar Association of Erie County

Work Experience

1993 - Present

Senior Attorney, Law Offices of Randy S. Margulis & Associates

1992 - 1992

Clerk, Circuit Court Of Cook County, Chicago, Illinois

Associations

2004 - Present

Matrimonial Trial Lawyers Association Of Western New York

Member

1997 - Present

NYS Bar Assn. Mock Trial

Judge

1997 - Present

Family Court Practice & Procedure Committee

Member

1996 - Present

Speakers Bureau Erie County Bar

Member

1993 - Present

Bar Association of Erie County

Member

2010 - 2011

Appellate Division Supreme Court

Law Guardian Program

2005 - 2009

Chief Administrator of the Supreme Court

Arbitrator

1996 - 2001

Variety Club Children's Foundation

Chairman Legal Committee

1991 - 1992

Chicago Bar Association Law Student Div.

Chairman

1991 - 1992

JMLS Bar Association

President

Sample of Legal Cases

Christopher J. VS. Colleen A.B.

Successfully defended and won custody for father.

See More Legal Cases

Education

1992

John Marshall Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

1984

State University of New York at Buffalo

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2014

The Law Line

Divorce

2007

The Law Line

Divorce

2006

Ask The Lawyer

Questions and Answers

2005

Parenting Education & Communication Effectiveness

Child Custody, Parenting

1998

New York State Bar Association CLE

Domestic Violence and Family Offenses in Family Court

Publications

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution