Gregory Paul Copeland

Gregory Paul Copeland

also known as Gregory Copeland, Gregory P Copeland

5.0
Rating: 8.5

Licensed for 16 years

Estate planning Lawyer at Rhinebeck, NY
Practice Areas: Estate Planning

6565 Spring Brook Avenue, Suite 8, #195, Rhinebeck, NY

About Gregory

Biography

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in New Jersey for 7 years

State: New Jersey

Acquired: 2018

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Connecticut for 10 years

State: Connecticut

Acquired: 2016

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in New York for 16 years

State: New York

Acquired: 2010

Currently Registered

No misconduct found

Location

Law Office of G P Copeland

6565 Spring Brook Avenue, Suite 8, #195, Rhinebeck, NY, 12572

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Gregory Paul Copeland's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

1 Client Review

Filter Avvo Reviews (1) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 1
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 0
What Clients Mention

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review

Posted by Ernesto | November 02, 2025

Definitely reccomended!

Gregory was prepared and well informed on the topics of our conversation. He was upfront, empathetic and kind. I will definitely be following up for more of his services.

See All Client Reviews

Gregory Paul Copeland's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Gregory

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  8.5 (Excellent)

Work Experience

2024 - Present

Principal, Law Office of G P Copeland

2019 - 2021

Legal Director, Rapid Defense Network

2017 - 2018

Supervising Attorney, The Legal Aid Society

2009 - 2017

Associate, Debevoise & Plimpton

Associations

2025 - Present

New York State Bar Association, Trusts and Estates Law Section

2025 - Present

American Bar Association, Real Property, Trust and Estate Law Section

2024 - Present

National Police Accountability Project

2017 - Present

American Immigration Lawyers Association

2009 - Present

American Bar Association

2009 - Present

New York State Bar Association

2024 - 2025

Dutchess County Bar Association

2024 - 2025

Ulster County Bar Association

2024 - 2025

New York State Academy of Trial Lawyers

2019 - 2021

Federal Bar Council

2019 - 2020

Federal Bar Association

2009 - 2015

New York City Bar Association

Sample of Legal Cases

Blake v. United States AG, Nos. 19-14316, 20-11335, 21-12334, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 19598 (11th Cir. July 15, 2022)

Petition for review granted, decisions vacated, and case remanded.

Joshua M. v. Barr, 439 F. Supp. 3d 632 (E.D. Va. 2020)

The court denied the government's motion to dismiss Joshua's habeas petition for lack of jurisdiction.

Sean B. v. McAleenan, 412 F. Supp. 3d 472 (D.N.J. 2019)

The court granted a limited stay barring the petitioner's removal until 14 days after the BIA renders its final decision.

Emeli v. Edwards, Civil Action No. 18-15029 (SRC), 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118585 (D.N.J. July 17, 2019)

The court granted Petitioner's habeas petition and ordered the government to provide Petitioner with an individualized bond hearing within 7 days.

S.N.C. v. Sessions, 325 F. Supp. 3d 401 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

Petition granted

Brissett v. Decker, 324 F. Supp. 3d 444 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

The petition for habeas corpus is granted in part. The government must provide Petitioner an individualized bond hearing within 14 days where it bears the burden of proving flight risk/dangerousness by clear and convincing evidence.

You v. Nielsen, 321 F. Supp. 3d 451 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

Petition for stay of removal granted.

Villavicencio Calderon v. Sessions, 330 F. Supp. 3d 944 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

The petition for a writ of habeas corpus was granted. The court ordered respondents to stay removal of petitioner from the United States and to release petitioner from custody.

Lopez v. Sessions, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98712 (S.D.N.Y. June 12, 2018)

The court grants the habeas petition and orders Petitioner's release under the terms of the prior Sponsorship Agreement.

Maldonado v. Lloyd, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75902 (S.D.N.Y. May 4, 2018)

The court granted the habeas petition and ordered EHE's immediate release to his mother.

Ramatu Kiadii v. Decker, 423 F. Supp. 3d 18 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

The court granted Petitioner's request for release on personal recognizance pending resolution of her habeas corpus petition.

Connecticut Coalition for Justice in Education Funding, Inc. v. Rell, Dkt. No. XO7-HHD-CV-145037565-S (September 7, 2016)

See More Legal Cases

Education

2009

Yeshiva University, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

J.D.

2004

Brown University

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2020

PHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS & THE CORNELL LAW SCHOOL MIGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS PROGRAM

Health & Immigration Detention During the COVID-19 Pandemic

2020

IMMIGRATION LAW CLINIC FALL 2020 SEMINAR

Movement Lawyering and Impact Immigration Litigation

2020

2020 AILA MIDWINTER CLE CONFERENCE

Creative Strategies for Motion to Suppress and Habeas

2019

2019 AILA ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON IMMIGRATION LAW

Federal Court Litigation - What You Need to Know Before You Go

Publications

Languages

English

Italian

French

German

Spanish

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution