Fort Lauderdale, FL
DUI and DWI Lawyer at Fort Lauderdale, FL
Practice Areas: DUI & DWI, Criminal Defense
OUTCOME: Judge granted the motion and excluded all of the evidence.
The defendant was stopped in a DUI checkpoint. Despite the fact that the vehicle selection procedures were discussed in a briefing, they were not specified in written checkpoint guidelines.
OUTCOME: Motion to Suppress granted.
Despite the fact that the officer observed signs of impairment, including an erratic driving pattern, the officer was not entitled to request a urine test which ultimately revealed several controlled s ... ubstances.
OUTCOME: Motion to Suppress granted.
The defendant was stopped while driving through a DUI checkpoint. It was argued by the defense that the checkpoint guidelines were insufficient concerning the vehicle selection procedures and gave too ... much discretion to the officers.
OUTCOME: The Motion to suppress was granted and subsequently upheld at the appellate level.
The defendant was allegedly involved in a traffic crash. The first officer conducted the accident investigation. A subsequent officer conducted the DUI investigation. Pursuant to F.S. 316.645, the a ... rresting officer must conduct an accident investigation at the scene of the crash prior to making an arrest. The Court concluded that the fellow officer rule does not apply.
OUTCOME: The appellate court upheld the lower court ruling.
The defendant was charged with a DUI. Rather than request field sobriety tests, the defendant was required to perform the tests based on the language used by the arresting officer. The court suppress ... ed all of the field sobriety tests. This case was used throughout the State of Florida requiring officers to request testing rather than to require it.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
