No Photo

Justin Victor Dearmas

Licensed for 18 years

Lawyer at Albany, NY

112 State St Fl 7, Albany, NY

Claim Profile

Is this your profile? Claiming it is free and only takes 2 minutes.

About Justin

Practice Areas

This attorney has not specified their practice areas.

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in New York for 18 years

State: New York

Acquired: 2008

Currently Registered

No misconduct found

Location

Albany County Alternate Public Defenders Office

112 State St Fl 7, Albany, NY, 12207-2005

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Justin Victor Dearmas's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

3.0 /5.0

2 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (2) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 1
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 1
Practice Areas

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 reviews

Posted by Dutcher | July 09, 2023 | Hired Attorney | Family

Unreliable, poor communication

After finding a great deal of bias for representation in our small community, our family went out of the area and hired Mr. Dearmas after finding promising reviews online. After a detailed telephone consult, we met with and ultimately hired Mr. Dearmas because of his confidence that our case would be... smooth to handle and his laid backed, down to earth demeanor. Mr. Dearmas was hired to handle a Family Court matter, that has escalated to a trial, where the child was seeking to reside on our custody. Within the first few months and first handful of appearances it became clear that Mr. Dearmas was very difficult to reach when needed or to even get any type of response back within a reasonable time frame. On more than one occasion, we had to outright tell him that we felt as if we were begging for his attention. Though he apologized, it continued. When it came time to conduct the trial, we had provided Mr. Dearmas an abundance of evidence, including mobile communications, social media transcripts, phone records, police reports, volunteered character references, parenting certificates completed voluntarily, a list of witnesses that we requested be included in our trial, school and medical records, certified formal correspondences, and more. From the very start to the conclusion of the trial, Mr. Dearmas proceeded, using NOTHING that was provided to him, and he honored none of our repeated requests to present our evidence and witnesses in support of our defense and in making our own case. During the line of questioning Mr. Dearmas had been provided a detailed, date by date account of our families difficulties with the other party and he failed to ask any significant questions, failed to even challenge the other parties narrative, often times, chose not to question at all, when given the opportunity to cross examine. Given that we had made sure to meticulously document the other parties abusive behavior and all encounters, we should have had a very easy win. Mr. Dearmas continued to sugar coat how we were doing, and skirt around nearly all of the allegations against us. We strongly felt that his representation was essentially serving us no purpose and our family was being portrayed horrendously. The other party was represented by a public defender that was dragging us through the mud. We made formal request to the court to adjourn to seek other representation, and our request was denied. Mr. Dearmas apologized and gave us the majority of our retainer back, but his poor communication with us, and his lack of fair representation, left us in the worst possible position, awaiting our verdict. We deeply regret hiring Mr. Dearmas for a Family Court matter, and after building a relationship with him, feel that Family Court matters are outside the scope of his professional ability and interest. He may very well be a promising, skilled criminal defense attorney, but he had assured us that our Family Court matter would be no problem. That was the farthest thing from the truth and he should have never taken our case, if he had no intention of fairly representing us.

Posted by Lars | April 15, 2015

Justin deArmas raises the bar for Attorneys

Truly incredible! If you give him an opportunity, you will understand exactly what I mean. He is an extremely knowledgeable and professional individual that is genuine and sincere in how he treated me as a client. Justin is the guy that will shoot it to you straight, but put you completely at ease wi...th the confidence that he is representing you and so down to earth you'll want to invite him for Sunday dinner with the family. If you want an attorney that treats you with the utmost of respect and will show you how high the bar can be raised in the legal field, give Attorney Justin deArmas an opportunity to impress you and I assure you that you will not be disappointed.

See All Client Reviews

Justin Victor Dearmas's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Justin

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Education

N/A

Albany Law School

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution