Great Neck, NY
Health care Lawyer at Great Neck, NY
Practice Areas: Health Care, Litigation
OUTCOME: Verdict for Plaintiff
Issue for trial was the medical necessity of services rendered. After trial, directed verdict for Plaintiff. Civil Court of the City of New York, Cunty of Kings. April 18, 2006. 13988/2005.
OUTCOME: Trial Verdict for Plaintiff
Verdict for Plaintiff medical provider after trial. Civil Court of the City of New York, County of Queens. April 6, 2006. 76469/2004.
OUTCOME: Trial Verdict for Plaintiff
Plaintiff medical provider's action seeking a money judgment against defendant insurance carrier for medical services rendered to its assignor pursuant to the NYS No-Fault laws and regulations. At tria ... l, both plaintiff and defendant presented medical experts as witnesses. The court found that {plaintiff's expert rebuttal witness} established within a preponderance of the evidence that the assignor's referring/treating doctor acted within the boundaries "of generally accepted medical practice" and that the ordering of the MRIS was based on a reasonable belief that the tests were in furtherance "of the patient's disgnosis and teratment." Judgment for Plaintiff. Civil Court of the City of New York, County of Bronx. April 6, 2006. 6140/2005.
OUTCOME: Trial Verdict for Plaintiff
After trial, judgment for Plaintiff in full for L-Spine MRI. Civil Court of the City of New York, County of Queens. April 3, 2006, 59815/2004.
OUTCOME: Trial Verdict for Plaintiff
Trial verdict for Plaintiff. Defendant's denial of claim form (NF-10) did not specify lack of medical necessity as a reason for the denial, and Plaintiff's motion was granted to preclude defendant-insu ... rer's peer review doctor from testifying as it was not a preserved defense. Civil Court of the City of New York, County of Bronx. 14219/2005. February 2, 2006. Judge Lizbeth Gonzalez.
OUTCOME: Trial Verdict for Plaintiff
Plaintiff medical provider's prima facie case for entitlement of no-fault benefits established by testimony of the defendant's litigation examiner who testified defendant had timely received the claim. ... Judgment for Plaintiff. Civil Court of the City of New York, County of Bronx, 61059/2003, January 27, 2006. Judge Lizbeth Gonzalez.
OUTCOME: Verdict for Plaintiff
At trial, PLAINTIFF MOVED FOR DIRECTED VERDICT BASED ON DEFECTIVE DENIAL (REFERENCED PEER REVIEW DATED 11/18/02 AND THE PEER IS DATED 11/19/02) ALL PAPERS WENT INTO EVIDENCE. MOTION IN LIMINE GRANTED F ... ULL VERDICT FOR PLAINTIFF. Civil Court of the City of New York, County of Bronx. 37393/2003. September 9, 2005.
OUTCOME: Trial decision for plaintiff
At trial, the Court found that a preponderence of evidence proves plaintiff's case. Judgment for Plaintiff.
OUTCOME: Trial verdict for plaintiff
Radiology medical provider (MRI facility) brought lawsuit to recover for unpaid no-fault benefits. Testimony was taken of plaintiff's and defendant's expert witnesses. After trial and testimony, the Co ... urt found that it is defendant's burden to prove lack of medical necessity and it is defendant's obligation to make sure that defendant's peer review doctor has been furnished a full and complete file to review. The Court cited Webster Ave Medical v Travelers Ins Co, 5 Misc 3rd 1024 (NY City Civ Ct) in the decision. The Court concluded that the defendant did not sustain its burden of proof for the lack of medical necessity of the MRI study provided to the patient. Judgment for Plaintiff after trial.
OUTCOME: Trial verdict for Plaintiff
Plaintiff MRI facility brought an action to recover payment for medical services. Expert witnesses for Plaintiff and Defendant testified. The Court found that the defendant did not sustain its burden o ... f proof for the lack of medical necessity of the MRI study provided to the patient. Judgment was rendered for Plaintiff.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
