New York, NY
Litigation Lawyer at New York, NY
Practice Areas: Litigation, Wrongful Death ... +2 more
OUTCOME: Favorable settlement in the amount of 1.1 million dollars prior to jury selection
Successfully brought action to set aside a series of fraudulent conveyances involving real property.
OUTCOME: After extended hearing before Court appointed referee, successfully defeated minority shareholder's lawsuit alleging corporate waste and mismanagement.
Action commenced against family members alleging corporate waste and mismanagement.
OUTCOME: After bench trial, verdict in favor of my client of resulting in a judgment in excess of $400,000
Action to set aside fraudulent conveyance in violation of the Debtor & Creditor law.
OUTCOME: $1,00,000 settlement on eve of trial (full amount of insurance coverage).
Personal injury case involving severe spinal cord injuries sustained by my client in a fall caused by the negligence of the owner of her apartment building.
OUTCOME: Mediated settlement in the amount of $440,000.
Lawsuit seeking the return of a contract deposit for commercial property in Queens.
OUTCOME: Action was dismissed in its entirety
Lawsuit brought against my client alleging a breach of an agreement to co-purchase the shares in a corporation and seeking 50% of the corporation's profits
OUTCOME: The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court's finding in favor of my client, holding that the alleged fraud victim was precluded from establishing that she lacked knowledge from which she could have discovered alleged fraud with reasonable diligence.
Action brought against my client alleging that he mislead and defrauded the plaintiff.
OUTCOME: Ruling in favor of my client, the Appellate Division reversed the lower court and held that seller's summary judgment motion was procedurally defective.
My client, a prospective purchaser of commercial property brought suit against the seller to recover its "non-refundable" deposit. The Supreme Court granted the seller's motion for summary judgment.
OUTCOME: Monetary judgment in favor or client
Client defrauded by defendants who held themselves out as a financial services firm in the business of trading in the spot foreign exchange market. In reality however, they operated a “Ponzi” scheme us ... ed to defraud my client and others.
OUTCOME: Appellate Division held that the Supreme Court erred in determining that “[t]he doctrine known as demand for adequate assurances of future performance”
Dispute involved breach of contract for sale of commercial property in Queens.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
