2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37833 N.Y. SMSA Ltd., P'Ship v. Town of Hempstead, E.D.N.Y. (10CV4997) (2013)
Mar 19, 2013
OUTCOME: Clients, the largest wireless telecommunications companies in the world, prevailed on its motion before the federal court, entirely.
The federal court granted our clients', Plaintiffs, which comprised the largest wireless telecommunications companies in the world, Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile, motion in all respects finding Defendant...s' wireless zoning regulations unlawful.
Construction and development
91 A.D.3d 859, 936 N.Y.S.2d 695 Velardo v. Tomescu
Jan 24, 2012
OUTCOME: The New York Appellate Court granted Mr. Galligan's motion, on behalf of Defendant, in its entirety.
On behalf of Defendant, Mr. Galligan handled this real estate contract dispute litigation from its inception to the brink of a trial. In this decision and order, the Appellate Court found Plaintiff lac...king the necessary license under the law to seek disputed damages from Defendant. This case has been cited multiple times by attorneys in subsequent cases.
Real estate
88 A.D. 3d 661, 930 N.Y.S.2d 619 Lunal Realty, LLC v. DiSanto Realty, LLC
Oct 04, 2011
OUTCOME: The client's causes of action for fraud and misrepresentation were upheld on appeal to continue before the trial court.
The client, Plaintiff Lunal Realty, a sophisticated real estate investor and property owner, brought suit against another investor regarding the sale of a residential building in New York. On behalf of... Plaintiff, Mr. Galligan undertook all of the appellate process and preserved multiple causes of action for Plaintiff against Defendant before the trial court.
Litigation
2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1185; 2011 WL 43458, Billion Tower Int'l LLC v. MDCT Corp.
Jan 06, 2011
OUTCOME: The federal court rendered a judgment in our client's favor, based upon an inquest by writing, without any changes or omissions.
The client, Billion Tower, a national clothing retailer focusing on "street" designs, sued MDCT for failure to honor its manufacturing contract and for attempting to resell Billion's trademarked protec...ted clothing and copyrighted brands. Billion submitted a lengthy written inquest detailing the substantial damages it had suffered as a result of MDCT's wrongful conduct, all of which damages resulted in the judgment the court awarded in this case.
OUTCOME: Client Large Wholesale Distributor of name-branded clothing and other products, prevailed on all claims.
Our client, Plaintiff Billion Tower Int'l, LLC ("Billion Tower") was a large wholesale distributor of name-brand clothing and other design products. Defendant MDCT ("MDCT") demanded that Plaintiff con...tinue payment on a manufacturing contract despite MDCT's having breached the contract. Billion Tower brought suit against MDCT for the damages it suffered from MDCT's breach of the contract, as well as an injunction compelling and enjoining MDCT with respect to certain conduct. Billion Tower prevailed on all claims, and Attorney Galligan primarily handled all inquest work on behalf of Billion Tower to recover on its judgment, This reported federal case encompasses the entire ruling, which involved many complex presentations of revenues, profits, and losses concerning the clothing retail business.
Commercial real estate
77 A.D.3d 707, 909 N.Y.S.2d 129, 41 N. 73 W., Inc. v. Westair Aviation Services, LLC
Oct 12, 2010
OUTCOME: Mr. Galligan's motion on behalf of Defendant was successful in all regards, essentially ensuring that the client's business dealings in the New York region continued unencumbered.
Mr. Galligan's client, a private aviation "fixed based operator," moved to dismiss its larger competitor's lawsuit seeking ridicilcous damages, and such motion, based on strategic and novel arguments b...y Mr. Galligan, the court granted in its entirety in favor of Mr. Galligan's client.
Telecommunications
739 F. Supp. 2d 409, MetroPCS N.Y., LLC v. City of Mount Vernon
Jul 22, 2010
OUTCOME: The federal court granted the client's motion for summary judgment in its entirety with entry of an injunction against Defendant.
Mr. Galligan's client, Plaintiff, one of the largest mobile telecommunications companies in the world, prevailed on its motion before the federal court, which held that the municipality improperly disc...riminated against Plaintiff, and that the substantial monetary charges imposed by Defendant upon Plaintiff in the ordinary course of business were "unreasonable and invalid."
Business
691 F. Supp. 2d 490, Drago v. Garment (08CV6356) (2010)
Mar 02, 2010
OUTCOME: The federal court granted the client's motion in its entirety (one of the largest mobile telecommunications companies in the world).
Drafted motion and obtained dismissal of complaint against Fortune 1000 telecommunications client resulting in decision and order in a case of first impression before the federal district court finding... no private right of action under the Telecommunications Act.
Business
691 F. Supp. 2d 490, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20921 Drago v. Garment, S.D.N.Y. 2010
