State v. Walker
Jun 17, 2016OUTCOME: Jury deadlocked 9 for not guilty, 3 for guilty.
Client charged with sexually assaulting female child during years of babysitting her. Charges not brought until over 10 years later.
PRO
Mark Patrick Foster Jr's Legal Cases (12)
Charlotte, NC
Criminal defense Lawyer at Charlotte, NC
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense, White Collar Crime ... +3 more
State v. anonymous
May 15, 2016OUTCOME: State declined to prosecute client.
Pre-indictment investigation of home healthcare provider for Medicaid fraud. Efforts focused on gathering evidence to contradict state Attorney General investigators' conclusions.
State v. Beam
Mar 25, 2016OUTCOME: Not guilty of all charges.
Adult client charged with raping relative's 12 year old daughter.
U.S. v. anonymous
Jan 01, 2015OUTCOME: U.S. Attorney declined to bring charges against client.
Federal pre-indictment investigation of investment broker for tax and securities fraud. Gathered and produced evidence to counter federal investigators' allegations.
State v. Thomas
Jan 01, 2014OUTCOME: Not guilty,.
Wife of professional athlete charged with two counts of assault with deadly weapon on security guard.
State v. Patel
Jan 01, 2012OUTCOME: Defense motion for dismissal of charges at close of State's case granted, case dismissed.
Client charged with maintaining a motel for purposes of drug use and distribution.
U.S. v. Otiko
Jan 01, 2009OUTCOME: Not guilty on all 29 counts.
Federal prosecution of internet pharmacy for alleged illegal distribution of controlled substances outside of prescription authority.
State v. Davis
Jan 01, 2008OUTCOME: Not guilty of murder; guilty of lesser offense of death by motor vehicle.
Second degree murder based on DWI head-on collision causing death of other driver.
State v. Milton
May 20, 2007OUTCOME: Not guilty.
Possession of cocaine. Client driving wife's car, cocaine found wedged between driver's seat and center console. Rejected plea offer, took case to trial.
U.S. v. Barber
Jun 24, 2005OUTCOME: Not guilty on all charges.
14-count wire and mail fraud prosecution based on allegedly phone investment scheme. All codefendants had pled guilty and testified against client at trial.