In the absence of a serious, long-lasting injury, there is nothing to sue for. No injury = no case.

This post asks if there is medical malpractice, but is notable in that there are ZERO medical facts (such as why the patient went to the hospital...

My colleagues' answers above are all correct, but nobody addressed the second half of any case: damages. Assuming the man was killed by the...

Sorry for your bad experience, but you do not report a serious, long-term injury that is needed to justify the enormous expense of a malpractice case.

You didn't tell us when this happened, and how long ago it was. The first thing you need is an electrical study (nerve conduction studies) to...

What you need is someone to "substitute in" your case, not to "continue" it. While you believe the case is "well-established" and definitely has...

I am sorry for your bad experience, but a single febrile seizure, and a few weeks of low-grade fever and malaise, while not fun at all, is not a...

I agree with my colleague‘s answer above. In addition, I would be very leery of a patient who surreptitiously videotapes or records their...

The statute of limitations is long expired on any malpractice that occured in 2015, unless you were <18 y.o. at the time. If you need treatment...

Your post assumes that a cardiology consult would have prevented the patient's death. But since we do not know what the actual cause of death was,...