Philip J. Loree Jr

Philip J. Loree Jr

5.0
Rating: 7.9

Licensed for 35 years

Arbitration Lawyer at New York, NY
Practice Areas: Arbitration, Litigation, Insurance

800 Third Avenue, 28th Floor, New York, NY

About Philip

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in New York for 35 years

State: New York

Acquired: 1990

Currently Registered

No misconduct found

Location

The Loree Law Firm

800 Third Avenue, 28th Floor, New York, NY, 10022

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Philip J. Loree Jr's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

1 Client Review

5 star (1)
4 star (0)
3 star (0)
2 star (0)
1 star (0)

Posted by anonymous | September 4, 2018 | Hired Attorney

This review is from a person who hired this attorney.

Dedicated & knowledgable attorney - highly recommend!

Phil is a highly impressive attorney - he took on my case when the odds of succeeding were very low. He was transparent & upfront to me about the chances of success and even provided a detailed analysis on possible outcomes. Once I still decided to pursue the case, he worked with full dedication on m...aking my case a win and despite me likely not being his highest paying client, he put in a lot of extra time to make sure that everything was executed in a flawless manner. In addition his detailed expertise with New York Law and Arbitration were critical in composing compelling briefs and arguments, and ultimately getting me the outcome that he was able to.

See All Client Reviews

Philip J. Loree Jr's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Philip

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  7.9 (Very Good)

Work Experience

2007 - 2008

Shareholder, Stevens & Lee

2002 - 2007

Litigation Partner, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, LLP

Sample of Legal Cases

Certain Underwriting Members of Lloyds v. State Dep't of Fin. Serv., __ F.3d __ (2d Cir. June 8, 2018)

The Second Circuit vacated the district court judgment, and remanded the matter to the district court for further proceedings.

In the Matter of Geo-Group Communications, Inc. v. Jaina Systems Network, Inc., 144 A.D.3d 598 (1st Dep't 2016)

New York's Appellate Division, First Department affirmed the judgment confirming the award.

KX Reinsurance Co. v. General Reinsurance Corp., 08 CV 7807 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y Nov. 14, 2008)

Court granted Motion to Vacate Award in Part

Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Home Ins. Co. , 429 F.3d 640 (6th Cir. 2005)

Court affirmed D. Ct. Order Confirming Award

See More Legal Cases

Education

1989

Brooklyn Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

1986

New York University

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2016

12th National Forum on Insurance Regulation, July 25 - 26, 2016, Carlton Hotel, New York, NY Regulation of Big Data and Its Use by Insurance Companies in Underwriting, Claims Handling, and Pricing

2015

New York Reinsurance 101, New York, New York

New York Reinsurance Law 101

2014

Advanced Forum on Reinsurance Regulation, New York, New York

Reinsurance Boot Camp Part I (Dispute Resolution): What Those Who Practice in the Regulatory and Legislative Aspects of the Industry Now Need to Know Regarding Arbitration and Litigation of Key Reinsurance Issues

2012

Advanced Forum on Reinsurance Disputes in Litigation and Arbitration

Procedural Challenges to Arbitration Proceedings and Federal Arbitration Act Disputes: Incorporating the Latest Developments Into Your Reinsurance Dispute Strategy

2011

Reinsurance Summit: Fresh Perspectives on the Reinsurance Front The Judicial Scrutiny of Arbitral Awards

2009

US/UK Reinsurance Arbitration Seminar: Reinsurance Arbitration: Approaching Things Differently Either Side of the "Pond." Comparative Reinsurance Arbitration Practice and Procedure: U.S. v. English Law

Publications

2020

Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation (Newsletter of the International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution (CPR)), 38 Alternatives 54 Schein’s Remand Decision Goes Back To the Supreme Court. What’s Next?

2020

Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation, Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation (Newsletter of the International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution (CPR)), 38 Alternatives 87 Why the U.S. Supreme Court Should Review Whether Arbitrability May Be Incorporated by Reference (with Richard D. Faulkner, Esq.)

2020

Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation (Newsletter of the International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution (CPR)), 38 Alternatives 70 (with RIchard D. Faulkner, Esq.) Schein’s Remand Decision: Should Scotus Review. . .

2019

Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation (Newsletter of the International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution (CPR)), 37 Alternatives 131 Back to Scotus's Schein : A Separability Analysis that Resolves the Problem with the Fifth Circuit's Remand

2019

Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation (Newsletter of the International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution (CPR)), 37 Alternatives 83 Scotus Introduces a New Federal Arbitration Act Presumption Against Consent to Class Arbitration

2015

Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation (Newsletter of the International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution (CPR)), 33 Alternatives 83 The First Circuit Reinstates an Award, With Questions On ADR, Statutes of Limitations, and Choice of Law

2011

Texas Tech Law Review (43 Texas Tech Law Review 757, with Donald R. Philbin Jr., Esq. and Audrey L. Maness, Esq.) Litigating Arbitration Slows as Mediation Becomes More Popular

2011

HarrisMartin Reinsurance Report, Vol. 3, Issue No. 11 Arbitrator Evident Partiality and the Duty to Disclose

2011

NE-ACR News -- Newsletter of the New England Chapter of the Association for Conflict Resolution Should States Regulate the Mediation Profession?

2010

Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation Despite Granite Rock's Procedural Dodge, Court Issues a Straightforward Decision on Bargaining Agreements

2010

Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation It’s Time for Doctrines: The Supreme Court Wrestles with "Severability" and the "Clear and Unmistakable" Standard

2010

Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation Stolt-Nielsen Delivers a New FAA Rule -- And then Federalizes the Law of Contracts

2010

Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation Rent-A-Center's Roadmap Extends Beyond Contracts. . . To Congress and the Supreme Court's New Term

2009

AIRROC Matters KX Reinsurance Co. v. General Reinsurance Corp.: Can Arbitrators Retain Jurisdiction After Resolving All Submitted Issues

2008

AIRROC Matters Arbitration Practice and Procedure in U.S. and U.K. Reinsurance Disputes: Is the Grass any Greener on the Other Side of the Pond? Part I

2008

AIRROC Matters Arbitration Practice and Procedure in U.S. and U.K. Reinsurance Disputes: Is the Grass any Greener on the Other Side of the Pond? Part II

2006

National Law Journal Settling the Standards for Neutral's Impartiality

2005

U.S. Insurer Dealing with the NAIC's New Certification Requirements

2004

Global Reinsurance Acting on Sarbox

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution